standing requires a litigant doctrine (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

standing requires a litigant doctrine in Ohio

5 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Taylor v. Academy Iron & Metal Co.green
ohio · 1988 · cited in 5 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1996–2020
2 sentences

2020Taylor v. Academy Iron & Metal Co., 36 Ohio St.3d 149, 152 , 522 N.E.2d 464 (1988).

2020Taylor v. Academy Iron & Metal Co., 36 Ohio St.3d 149, 152 , 522 N.E.2d 464 (1988).

25

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check