fair trial by cumulative error (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

fair trial by cumulative error in Oklahoma

5 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Ashinsky v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1989 · cited in 3 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2010–2017
2 sentences

2017Ashinsky v. State , 1989 OK CR 59, ¶ 31, 780 P.2d 201, 209 ("[A]n accumulation of error argument will be rejected where all of the alleged errors are meritless."); Bechtel v. State , 1987 OK CR 126, ¶ 12, 738 P.2d 559, 561; Therefore, Proposition Five is denied.

2017Ashinsky v. State , 1989 OK CR 59, ¶ 31, 780 P.2d 201, 209 ("[A]n accumulation of error argument will be rejected where all of the alleged errors are meritless."); Bechtel v. State , 1987 OK CR 126, ¶ 12, 738 P.2d 559, 561; Therefore, Proposition Five is denied.

23
Bechtel v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1987 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Ashinsky v. State , 1989 OK CR 59, ¶ 31, 780 P.2d 201, 209 ("[A]n accumulation of error argument will be rejected where all of the alleged errors are meritless."); Bechtel v. State , 1987 OK CR 126, ¶ 12, 738 P.2d 559, 561; Therefore, Proposition Five is denied.

2017Ashinsky v. State , 1989 OK CR 59, ¶ 31 , 780 P.2d 201, 209 ("[A]n accumulation of error argument will be rejected where all of the alleged errors are meritless."); Bechtel v. State , 1987 OK CR 126 , ¶ 12, 738 P.2d 559, 561 ; Therefore, Proposition Five is denied.

12
Ruth v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See Ruth v. State, 966 P.2d 799 (Okl.Cr.1998), Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okl.Cr.1993). ¶ 19 In Proposition VII, we find Appellant was not denied a fair trial by cumulative error.

2003See Ruth v. State, 966 P.2d 799 (OkL.Cr.1998), Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okl.Cr.1993). 19 In Proposition VII, we find Appellant was not denied a fair trial by cumulative error.

11
Chapple v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See Ruth v. State, 966 P.2d 799 (Okl.Cr.1998), Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okl.Cr.1993). ¶ 19 In Proposition VII, we find Appellant was not denied a fair trial by cumulative error.

2003See Ruth v. State, 966 P.2d 799 (OkL.Cr.1998), Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okl.Cr.1993). 19 In Proposition VII, we find Appellant was not denied a fair trial by cumulative error.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Lott v. State green
oklacrimapp · 2004
1 sentence

2010Lott, 2004 OK CR 27 , 1 167, 98 P.8d at 357. 1 17 Accordingly, this appeal is denied.

12010–2010

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 701.7 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OK 5 (2003–2017) NY 4 (1995–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check