Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ashinsky v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Ashinsky v. State , 1989 OK CR 59, ¶ 31, 780 P.2d 201, 209 ("[A]n accumulation of error argument will be rejected where all of the alleged errors are meritless."); Bechtel v. State , 1987 OK CR 126, ¶ 12, 738 P.2d 559, 561; Therefore, Proposition Five is denied. 2017Ashinsky v. State , 1989 OK CR 59, ¶ 31, 780 P.2d 201, 209 ("[A]n accumulation of error argument will be rejected where all of the alleged errors are meritless."); Bechtel v. State , 1987 OK CR 126, ¶ 12, 738 P.2d 559, 561; Therefore, Proposition Five is denied. | 2 | 3 |
Bechtel v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Ashinsky v. State , 1989 OK CR 59, ¶ 31, 780 P.2d 201, 209 ("[A]n accumulation of error argument will be rejected where all of the alleged errors are meritless."); Bechtel v. State , 1987 OK CR 126, ¶ 12, 738 P.2d 559, 561; Therefore, Proposition Five is denied. 2017Ashinsky v. State , 1989 OK CR 59, ¶ 31 , 780 P.2d 201, 209 ("[A]n accumulation of error argument will be rejected where all of the alleged errors are meritless."); Bechtel v. State , 1987 OK CR 126 , ¶ 12, 738 P.2d 559, 561 ; Therefore, Proposition Five is denied. | 1 | 2 |
Ruth v. Stategreen2 sentences2003See Ruth v. State, 966 P.2d 799 (Okl.Cr.1998), Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okl.Cr.1993). ¶ 19 In Proposition VII, we find Appellant was not denied a fair trial by cumulative error. 2003See Ruth v. State, 966 P.2d 799 (OkL.Cr.1998), Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okl.Cr.1993). 19 In Proposition VII, we find Appellant was not denied a fair trial by cumulative error. | 1 | 1 |
Chapple v. Stategreen2 sentences2003See Ruth v. State, 966 P.2d 799 (Okl.Cr.1998), Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okl.Cr.1993). ¶ 19 In Proposition VII, we find Appellant was not denied a fair trial by cumulative error. 2003See Ruth v. State, 966 P.2d 799 (OkL.Cr.1998), Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okl.Cr.1993). 19 In Proposition VII, we find Appellant was not denied a fair trial by cumulative error. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lott v. State
green
1 sentence2010Lott, 2004 OK CR 27 , 1 167, 98 P.8d at 357. 1 17 Accordingly, this appeal is denied. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.