Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2020–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Parker v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn.green2 sentences2025State v. Husk, 288 Or App 737 , 739, 407 P3d 932 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (“Under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, before a police officer may stop a citizen for a traffic violation, the officer must have probable cause to believe that a viola- tion occurred.”). 2025State v. Husk, 288 Or App 737 , 739, 407 P3d 932 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (“Under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, before a police officer may stop a citizen for a traffic violation, the officer must have probable cause to believe that a viola- tion occurred.”). | 3 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2021See State v. Husk, 288 Or App 737 , 739, 407 P3d 932 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (“Under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, before a police officer may stop a citizen for a traffic violation, the officer must have probable cause to believe that a violation occurred.”); State v. Jones, 286 Or App 562 , 565 n 1, 401 P3d 271 (2017) (declining to revisit probable cause standard for traffic stops and declining to change standard to allow for probable cause to rest on reasonable mistakes of law). 2021See State v. Husk, 288 Or App 737 , 739, 407 P3d 932 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (“Under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, before a police officer may stop a citizen for a traffic violation, the officer must have probable cause to believe that a violation occurred.”); State v. Jones, 286 Or App 562 , 565 n 1, 401 P3d 271 (2017) (declining to revisit probable cause standard for traffic stops and declining to change standard to allow for probable cause to rest on reasonable mistakes of law). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Aguilar
green
1 sentence2020It is also significant that the trial court’s decision on the motion to suppress occurred before the Supreme Court decided State v. Arreola-Botello, 365 Or 695, 712 , 451 P3d 939 (2019), which rejected the “unavoidable lull doctrine” and con- cluded that officers cannot ask questions unrelated to the investigation of the Cite as 307 Or App 457 (2020) 467 section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, an officer must develop probable cause—rather than merely reasonable suspicion— to stop a citizen for a traffic violation. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Arreola-Botello
green
2 sentences2020It is also significant that the trial court’s decision on the motion to suppress occurred before the Supreme Court decided State v. Arreola-Botello, 365 Or 695, 712 , 451 P3d 939 (2019), which rejected the “unavoidable lull doctrine” and con- cluded that officers cannot ask questions unrelated to the investigation of the Cite as 307 Or App 457 (2020) 467 section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, an officer must develop probable cause—rather than merely reasonable suspicion— to stop a citizen for a traffic violation. 2020It is also significant that the trial court’s decision on the motion to suppress occurred before the Supreme Court decided State v. Arreola-Botello, 365 Or 695, 712 , 451 P3d 939 (2019), which rejected the “unavoidable lull doctrine” and con- cluded that officers cannot ask questions unrelated to the investigation of the Cite as 307 Or App 457 (2020) 467 section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, an officer must develop probable cause—rather than merely reasonable suspicion— to stop a citizen for a traffic violation. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Gordon
neutral
2 sentences2020State v. Gordon, 273 Or App 495, 500 , 359 P3d 499 (2015), rev den, 358 Or 529 (2016). 2020State v. Gordon, 273 Or App 495, 500 , 359 P3d 499 (2015), rev den, 358 Or 529 (2016). | 1 | 2020–2020 |