compensatory fine for legal error (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

compensatory fine for legal error in Oregon

5 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Grismoregreen
orctapp · 2016 · cited in 3 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2017–2023
2 sentences

2023See State v. Grismore, 283 Or App 71, 73 , 388 P3d 1144 (2016) (“We review a trial court’s imposition of a compensatory fine for legal error.”); State v. Aguirre- Rodriguez, 367 Or 614, 620 , 482 P3d 62 (2021) (in a chal- lenge to the sufficiency of the evidence within the meaning of ORS 31.705(2)(a), we examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party to determine “whether a rational factfinder, accepting all reasonable inferences, could have found the facts necessary to support the award”).

2023See State v. Grismore, 283 Or App 71, 73 , 388 P3d 1144 (2016) (“We review a trial court’s imposition of a compensatory fine for legal error.”); State v. Aguirre- Rodriguez, 367 Or 614, 620 , 482 P3d 62 (2021) (in a chal- lenge to the sufficiency of the evidence within the meaning of ORS 31.705(2)(a), we examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party to determine “whether a rational factfinder, accepting all reasonable inferences, could have found the facts necessary to support the award”).

13
State v. Neesegreen
orctapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See State v. Neese, 229 Or App 182, 184 , 210 P3d 933 (2009), rev den, 347 Or 718 (2010) (“Whether a trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine is a question of law.”).

2016See State v. Neese, 229 Or App 182, 184 , 210 P3d 933 (2009), rev den, 347 Or 718 (2010) (“Whether a trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine is a question of law.”).

11
State v. Worthgreen
or · 2010 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See State v. Neese, 229 Or App 182, 184 , 210 P3d 933 (2009), rev den, 347 Or 718 (2010) (“Whether a trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine is a question of law.”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Aguirre-Rodriguez green
or · 2021
2 sentences

2023See State v. Grismore, 283 Or App 71, 73 , 388 P3d 1144 (2016) (“We review a trial court’s imposition of a compensatory fine for legal error.”); State v. Aguirre- Rodriguez, 367 Or 614, 620 , 482 P3d 62 (2021) (in a chal- lenge to the sufficiency of the evidence within the meaning of ORS 31.705(2)(a), we examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party to determine “whether a rational factfinder, accepting all reasonable inferences, could have found the facts necessary to support the award”).

2023See State v. Grismore, 283 Or App 71, 73 , 388 P3d 1144 (2016) (“We review a trial court’s imposition of a compensatory fine for legal error.”); State v. Aguirre- Rodriguez, 367 Or 614, 620 , 482 P3d 62 (2021) (in a chal- lenge to the sufficiency of the evidence within the meaning of ORS 31.705(2)(a), we examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party to determine “whether a rational factfinder, accepting all reasonable inferences, could have found the facts necessary to support the award”).

12023–2023
State v. Alonso green
orctapp · 2017
2 sentences

2022State v. Alonso, 284 Or App 512, 515 , 393 P3d 256 (2017).

2022State v. Alonso, 284 Or App 512, 515 , 393 P3d 256 (2017).

12022–2022

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.101 (5) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.103 (4) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.106 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check