Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1933–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Othus v. Kozergreen2 sentences1976In Othus v. Kozer, 119 Or 101, 109 , 248 P 146 (1926), which involved an initiative petition, the court said: "Election laws should be liberally construed: [Citing cases.] The great constitutional privilege of a citizen should not be taken away by a narrow or technical construction of a law regulating the exercise of such right. * i}c See also, Kays v. McCall, 244 Or 361, 373 , 418 P2d 511 (1966). 1976In Othus v. Kozer, 119 Or 101, 109 , 248 P 146 (1926), which involved an initiative petition, the court said: "Election laws should be liberally construed: [Citing cases.] The great constitutional privilege of a citizen should not be taken away by a narrow or technical construction of a law regulating the exercise of such right. * i}c See also, Kays v. McCall, 244 Or 361, 373 , 418 P2d 511 (1966). | 1 | 3 |
State v. Leegreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., Joseph Story, 2 Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States: With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution 678-80 (3d ed 1858) (the Fourth Amendment search and seizure guarantee “is little more than the affirmance of a great constitutional doctrine of the common law” requiring warrants to state with particularity the time, place, and nature of the offense). 4 See also State v. Lee, 120 Or 643, 651 , 253 P 533 (1927) (upholding consti- tutionality of warrantless search). 2015See, e.g., Joseph Story, 2 Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States: With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution 678-80 (3d ed 1858) (the Fourth Amendment search and seizure guarantee “is little more than the affirmance of a great constitutional doctrine of the common law” requiring warrants to state with particularity the time, place, and nature of the offense). 4 See also State v. Lee, 120 Or 643, 651 , 253 P 533 (1927) (upholding consti- tutionality of warrantless search). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Bylander v. Hoss
green
2 sentences2021The great constitutional privilege of a citizen to exercise his sovereign right to vote should not be taken away by narrow or technical construction.” State ex rel. v. Hoss, 143 Or 383, 389 , 22 P2d 883 (1933). 2021The great constitutional privilege of a citizen to exercise his sovereign right to vote should not be taken away by narrow or technical construction.” State ex rel. v. Hoss, 143 Or 383, 389 , 22 P2d 883 (1933). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Kays v. McCall
green
2 sentences1976In Othus v. Kozer, 119 Or 101, 109 , 248 P 146 (1926), which involved an initiative petition, the court said: "Election laws should be liberally construed: [Citing cases.] The great constitutional privilege of a citizen should not be taken away by a narrow or technical construction of a law regulating the exercise of such right. * i}c See also, Kays v. McCall, 244 Or 361, 373 , 418 P2d 511 (1966). 1976In Othus v. Kozer, 119 Or 101, 109 , 248 P 146 (1926), which involved an initiative petition, the court said: "Election laws should be liberally construed: [Citing cases.] The great constitutional privilege of a citizen should not be taken away by a narrow or technical construction of a law regulating the exercise of such right. * i}c See also, Kays v. McCall, 244 Or 361, 373 , 418 P2d 511 (1966). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.