offense constitutes violation (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

offense constitutes violation in Oregon

5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1980–1990 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Chang Hwan Chogreen
or · 1984 · cited in 3 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1987–1990
2 sentences

1990The majority also ignores ORS 161.115, which provides, in part: “(1) If a statute defining an offense prescribes a culpable mental state but does not specify the element to which it applies, the prescribed culpable mental state applies to each material element of the offense that necessarily requires a culpable mental state. “(2) Except as provided in ORS 161.105, if a statute defining an offense does not prescribe a culpable mental state, culpability is nonetheless required and is established only if a person acts intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence.” ORS 161.105

1990The majority also ignores ORS 161.115, which provides, in part: “(1) If a statute defining an offense prescribes a culpable mental state but does not specify the element to which it applies, the prescribed culpable mental state applies to each material element of the offense that necessarily requires a culpable mental state. “(2) Except as provided in ORS 161.105, if a statute defining an offense does not prescribe a culpable mental state, culpability is nonetheless required and is established only if a person acts intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence.” ORS 161.105

13
State v. Buttreygreen
or · 1982 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See State v. Buttrey, 293 Or 575 , 651 P2d 1075 (1982) (driving while suspended intended to be strict liability crime).

1983See State v. Buttrey, 293 Or 575 , 651 P2d 1075 (1982) (driving while suspended intended to be strict liability crime).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Wolfe green
or · 1980
2 sentences

1980ORS 161.095(2), as part of the 1971 revision of Oregon’s criminal law, enacted the principle that criminal guilt requires a culpable mental state except as stated in the next section. 2 That exception, ORS 161.105, is stated as follows: "(1) Notwithstanding ORS 161.095, a culpable mental state is not required if: "(a) The offense constitutes a violation, unless a culpable mental state is expressly included in the definition of the offense; or "(b) An offense defined by a statute outside the Oregon Criminal Code clearly indicates a legislative intent to dispense with any culpable mental state r

1980ORS 161.095(2), as part of the 1971 revision of Oregon’s criminal law, enacted the principle that criminal guilt requires a culpable mental state except as stated in the next section. 2 That exception, ORS 161.105, is stated as follows: "(1) Notwithstanding ORS 161.095, a culpable mental state is not required if: "(a) The offense constitutes a violation, unless a culpable mental state is expressly included in the definition of the offense; or "(b) An offense defined by a statute outside the Oregon Criminal Code clearly indicates a legislative intent to dispense with any culpable mental state r

11980–1980

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.095 (5) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.105 (5) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.025 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.505 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OR 5 (1980–1990) CA 2 (2016–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check