5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Son v. Ashland Community Healthcare Servicesgreen1 sentence2015See Son, 239 Or App at 508 ; see also Joshi, 342 Or at 163-64 . | 1 | 1 |
Joshi v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.green1 sentence2015See Son, 239 Or App at 508 ; see also Joshi, 342 Or at 163-64 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stevens v. Bispham
green
2 sentences2025Plaintiff has not been exonerated of any crime.” Id. 2025Plaintiff has not been exonerated of any crime.” Id. | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Zehr v. Haugen
green
2 sentences2017Plaintiff then alleged that, “ [a] s a result of the negligence of [Providence, Dessiter, and Harris], on a more probable than not basis, [plaintiff] lost a chance for treatment which, 33 percent of the time, provides a much better outcome, with reduced or no stroke symptoms.” 2 Plaintiff further alleged that, “[a]s a result of defendants’ negligence and his injuries,” he “lost his ability to work” and “has serious and permanent injuries.” He requested damages “for lost wages or impairment of earning capacity” and “non-economic damages.” In a professional negligence claim, a plaintiff must all 2017Plaintiff then alleged that, “ [a] s a result of the negligence of [Providence, Dessiter, and Harris], on a more probable than not basis, [plaintiff] lost a chance for treatment which, 33 percent of the time, provides a much better outcome, with reduced or no stroke symptoms.” 2 Plaintiff further alleged that, “[a]s a result of defendants’ negligence and his injuries,” he “lost his ability to work” and “has serious and permanent injuries.” He requested damages “for lost wages or impairment of earning capacity” and “non-economic damages.” In a professional negligence claim, a plaintiff must all | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Harris v. Kissling
green
2 sentences2017Citing Harris v. Kissling, 80 Or App 5 , 721 P2d 838 (1986), and distinguishing Joshi , plaintiff argued that Oregon recognizes loss of chance “in medical negligence actions for injuries” and that many other states allow claims for loss of chance. 2017Citing Harris v. Kissling, 80 Or App 5 , 721 P2d 838 (1986), and distinguishing Joshi , plaintiff argued that Oregon recognizes loss of chance “in medical negligence actions for injuries” and that many other states allow claims for loss of chance. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Sims v. Dixon
green
2 sentences2017Ultimately, the plaintiff must prove causation by a “reasonable probability.” Sims v. Dixon, 224 Or 45, 48 , 355 P2d 478 (1960). 2017Ultimately, the plaintiff must prove causation by a “reasonable probability.” Sims v. Dixon, 224 Or 45, 48 , 355 P2d 478 (1960). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Widing v. ESTATE OF WIDING
neutral
2 sentences1998Affirmed. 1 A related controversy was before us in Widing v. Estate of Glenn A. Widing, 149 Or App 451 , 944 P2d 969 (1997). 2 Under our standard of review of the trial court’s rulings on defendants’ motions for summary judgment, we view the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. 1998Affirmed. 1 A related controversy was before us in Widing v. Estate of Glenn A. Widing, 149 Or App 451 , 944 P2d 969 (1997). 2 Under our standard of review of the trial court’s rulings on defendants’ motions for summary judgment, we view the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.