8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Michael v. Huffman Oil Co., Inc.green2 sentences2018A claimant is required to establish the standard of care for a professional negligence claim through expert testimony “[w]here the common knowledge and experience of the jury is [not] sufficient to evaluate compliance with a standard of care[.]” Id. (quoting Michael v. Huffman Oil Co., 190 N.C. 2018App. 256, 271 , 661 S.E.2d 1, 11 (2008)). | 1 | 2 |
Webster v. Powellgreen2 sentences2014The ground for reversing a court's decision on such a motion is an abuse of discretion.” Webster v. Powell, 98 N.C. 2013App. 432, 440 , 391 S.E.2d 204, 208 (1990) (“A professional negligence claim against an attorney is, in essence, a legal malpractice claim.”), aff’dper curiam, 328 N.C. 88 , 399 S.E.2d 113 (1991). | 1 | 2 |
Comput. Design & Integration, LLC v. Browngreen1 sentence2022Design & Integration, LLC v. Brown, 2018 NCBC 128, ¶ 153 (N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Bogovich v. Embassy Club of Sedgefield, Inc.green1 sentence2021See, e.g., Bogovich v. Embassy Club of Sedgefield, Inc., 211 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.green1 sentence2018See, e.g., Hassebrock v. Bernhoft, 815 F.3d 334, 343 (7th Cir. 2016) (“[E]stablishing the duty of care for accountants requires expert testimony.”); In re Puda Coal Sec., Inc., 30 F. Supp. 3d 230, 249 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (“In accounting malpractice cases, in which a mere negligence standard could be sufficient to establish liability, expert testimony is typically required.”); Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., 732 N.W.2d 209, 218 (Minn. 2007) (holding plaintiff asserting accounting malpractice claim must present expert testimony identifying applicable standard of care and opining that acc | 1 | 1 |
In re Puda Coal Securities Inc., Litigationgreen1 sentence2018See, e.g., Hassebrock v. Bernhoft, 815 F.3d 334, 343 (7th Cir. 2016) (“[E]stablishing the duty of care for accountants requires expert testimony.”); In re Puda Coal Sec., Inc., 30 F. Supp. 3d 230, 249 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (“In accounting malpractice cases, in which a mere negligence standard could be sufficient to establish liability, expert testimony is typically required.”); Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., 732 N.W.2d 209, 218 (Minn. 2007) (holding plaintiff asserting accounting malpractice claim must present expert testimony identifying applicable standard of care and opining that acc | 1 | 1 |
Orvil Hassebrock v. Robert Bernhoftgreen1 sentence2018See, e.g., Hassebrock v. Bernhoft, 815 F.3d 334, 343 (7th Cir. 2016) (“[E]stablishing the duty of care for accountants requires expert testimony.”); In re Puda Coal Sec., Inc., 30 F. Supp. 3d 230, 249 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (“In accounting malpractice cases, in which a mere negligence standard could be sufficient to establish liability, expert testimony is typically required.”); Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., 732 N.W.2d 209, 218 (Minn. 2007) (holding plaintiff asserting accounting malpractice claim must present expert testimony identifying applicable standard of care and opining that acc | 1 | 1 |
Harrold v. Dowdgreen2 sentences2012J.) {26} The Stratton Plaintiffs were parties to the original Cabrera Case filed on June 23, 2009, and alleged in the Complaint a claim for professional negligence against “Unknown Appraiser #5.” (Compl. ¶ 211.) The substitution of Defendant Hollifield in the Amended Complaint for “Unknown Appraiser # 5” attempts to identify the previously unknown appraiser, and to have the professional negligence claim relate back to the date when Plaintiffs filed the original Complaint. {27} A cause of action for professional negligence would have accrued “when the wrong giving rise to the right to bring sui 2012App. at 781 , 561 S.E.2d at 918 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frankenmuth Insurance v. City of Hickory
green
1 sentence2018A claimant is required to establish the standard of care for a professional negligence claim through expert testimony “[w]here the common knowledge and experience of the jury is [not] sufficient to evaluate compliance with a standard of care[.]” Id. (quoting Michael v. Huffman Oil Co., 190 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Webster v. Powell
procedural
2 sentences2013App. 432, 440 , 391 S.E.2d 204, 208 (1990) (“A professional negligence claim against an attorney is, in essence, a legal malpractice claim.”), aff’dper curiam, 328 N.C. 88 , 399 S.E.2d 113 (1991). 2013App. 432, 440 , 391 S.E.2d 204, 208 (1990) (“A professional negligence claim against an attorney is, in essence, a legal malpractice claim.”), aff’dper curiam, 328 N.C. 88 , 399 S.E.2d 113 (1991). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Whiteheart v. Waller
green
1 sentence2012In seeking to persuade us to reach a different result, Defendant relies upon our decision in Whiteheart v. Waller, 199 N.C. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.