Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
F.D.P. v. Ferraragreen2 sentences2017However, this Court has held that “Rule 341(e) certification, under the clear language of the rule, is available only to ‘final’ orders disposing of one but fewer than all parties or causes of action.” F.D.P. v. Ferrara, 804 A.2d 1221, 1226 (Pa. Super. 2002). “[Certification under Rule 341(c) was designed to allow for an immediate appeal of a ‘final’ order relating to [fewer] than all parties or [fewer] than all claims. 2003As this Court recently held in F.D.P. v. Ferrara, 804 A.2d 1221, 1226 (Pa.Super.2002), “Rule 341(c) certification, under the clear language of the rule, is available only to ‘final’ orders disposing of one but fewer than all parties or causes of action.” Here, the context of the underlying order is interlocutory; finality is not defeated solely by outstanding claims or parties. | 2 | 2 |
Horowitz v. Universal Underwriters Insurancegreen1 sentence2017See, e.g., Horowitz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 580 A.2d 395, 398 (Pa. Super. 1990); Winterhalter v. West Penn Power Co., 512 A.2d 1187 , 1189 26 (Pa. Super. 1986) ("Courts have allowed amendments at any time, as provided by the specific language of this statute.); Biglan v. Biglan, 479 A.2d 1021, 1025 ("As can be seen from the clear language of this rule, no limit is imposed on the time when an amendment may be made."). | 1 | 1 |
Biglan v. Biglangreen1 sentence2017See, e.g., Horowitz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 580 A.2d 395, 398 (Pa. Super. 1990); Winterhalter v. West Penn Power Co., 512 A.2d 1187 , 1189 26 (Pa. Super. 1986) ("Courts have allowed amendments at any time, as provided by the specific language of this statute.); Biglan v. Biglan, 479 A.2d 1021, 1025 ("As can be seen from the clear language of this rule, no limit is imposed on the time when an amendment may be made."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Winterhalter v. West Penn Power Co.
green
1 sentence2017See, e.g., Horowitz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 580 A.2d 395, 398 (Pa. Super. 1990); Winterhalter v. West Penn Power Co., 512 A.2d 1187 , 1189 26 (Pa. Super. 1986) ("Courts have allowed amendments at any time, as provided by the specific language of this statute.); Biglan v. Biglan, 479 A.2d 1021, 1025 ("As can be seen from the clear language of this rule, no limit is imposed on the time when an amendment may be made."). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation v. Hodes
green
1 sentence2002Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Hodes, 784 A.2d 144 (Pa.Super.2001); Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp., 385 Pa.Super. 260 , 560 A.2d 793 (1989); see also Shadduck v. Christopher J. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp.
green
2 sentences2002Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Hodes, 784 A.2d 144 (Pa.Super.2001); Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp., 385 Pa.Super. 260 , 560 A.2d 793 (1989); see also Shadduck v. Christopher J. 2002Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Hodes, 784 A.2d 144 (Pa.Super.2001); Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp., 385 Pa.Super. 260 , 560 A.2d 793 (1989); see also Shadduck v. Christopher J. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. White
green
2 sentences1982They cite such authority as Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. White, 451 Pa. 137 , 302 A.2d 347 (1973),. and the clear-language rule discussed therein. 1982They cite such authority as Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. White, 451 Pa. 137 , 302 A.2d 347 (1973),. and the clear-language rule discussed therein. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.