Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lejeunegreen2 sentences2017See State v. LeJeune, 276 Ga. 179 , 576 S.E.2d 888, 892 (2003) (“There is an automobile exception to the search warrant requirement, not an exemption.”) (emphasis added); see also Coolidge, 403 U.S. at 481 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 (“the exceptions [to the warrant requirement] cannot be enthroned into the rule”). 2017See State v. LeJeune, 276 Ga. 179 , 576 S.E.2d 888, 892 (2003) (“There is an automobile exception to the search warrant requirement, not an exemption.”) (emphasis added); see also Coolidge, 403 U.S. at 481 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 (“the exceptions [to the warrant requirement] cannot be enthroned into the rule”). | 4 | 4 |
Coolidge v. New Hampshiregreen2 sentences2017See State v. LeJeune, 276 Ga. 179 , 576 S.E.2d 888, 892 (2003) (“There is an automobile exception to the search warrant requirement, not an exemption.”) (emphasis added); see also Coolidge, 403 U.S. at 481 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 (“the exceptions [to the warrant requirement] cannot be enthroned into the rule”). 2017See State v. LeJeune, 276 Ga. 179 , 576 S.E.2d 888, 892 (2003) (“There is an automobile exception to the search warrant requirement, not an exemption.”) (emphasis added); see also Coolidge, 403 U.S. at 481 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 (“the exceptions [to the warrant requirement] cannot be enthroned into the rule”). | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Patton v. MacK Trucks, Inc.
green
2 sentences1990We must also reject the related argument that a warranty necessarily extends to future performance when the aggrieved party cannot possibly discover the breach until after tender of delivery." 360 Pa.Super. at 9-11 , 519 A.2d at 964-65 . 1990We must also reject the related argument that a warranty necessarily extends to future performance when the aggrieved party cannot possibly discover the breach until after tender of delivery." 360 Pa.Super. at 9-11 , 519 A.2d at 964-65 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.