Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1970–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Board of Commissioners of McCandless Township v. Beho Development Co.green2 sentences1990See also McCandless Township v. Beho Development Corp., 16 Pa.Cmwlth. 448 , 332 A.2d 848 (1975) (the granting of variances is exclusively a function of the zoning hearing board). 1990See also McCandless Township v. Beho Development Corp., 16 Pa.Cmwlth. 448 , 332 A.2d 848 (1975) (the granting of variances is exclusively a function of the zoning hearing board). | 2 | 2 |
Lower Allen Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Lower Allen Township Zoning Hearing Board & Hempt Bros.green1 sentence2020Zoning Hearing Bd., 500 A.2d 1253, 1258 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1985). 6 Moreover, the determination of whether an applicant adduces evidence sufficient to allow a zoning hearing board to grant a dimensional variance is the function of the zoning hearing board and will not be overturned on appeal unless it is not supported by substantial evidence. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Appeal of Towamencin Townshipgreen1 sentence2020In re Towamencin Twp., 42 A.3d 366, 370 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DiBello v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
green
1 sentence1981We cannot accept Broad Acres’ assertion that Di Bello v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adjustment, 4 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 546 , 287 A. 2d 56 (1972), is applicable here. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Roeder v. Hatfield Borough Council
green
1 sentence1970The function of the zoning hearing board is “to prepare a record if special issues of fact or interpretation exist which have not been determined at a hearing before another competent agency or body”: Roeder v. Hatfield Borough Council, supra, p. 247 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |