party may not properly claim in Pennsylvania

1993Northwestern National Bank v. Commonwealth, 345 Pa. 192 , 27 A.2d 20 (1942). *72 Id., 409 Pa.Super. at 247 , 597 A.2d at 1187 .

1993Northwestern National Bank v. Commonwealth, 345 Pa. 192 , 27 A.2d 20 (1942). *72 Id., 409 Pa.Super. at 247 , 597 A.2d at 1187 .

1974If notwithstanding such representation or conduct he was still obliged to inquire for the existence of other facts and to rely on them also to sustain the course of action adopted, he cannot claim that the conduct of the other party was the cause of his action and no estoppel will arise.’ [Oiting an authority.] ‘Where there is no concealment, misrepresentation, or other inequitable conduct by the other party, a party may not properly claim that an estoppel arises in his favor from his own omission or mistake.’: [citing authority], ‘Estoppel cannot be predicated on errors of judgment by person

1974If notwithstanding such representation or conduct he was still obliged to inquire for the existence of other facts and to rely on them also to sustain the course of action adopted, he cannot claim that the conduct of the other party was the cause of his action and no estoppel will arise.’ [Oiting an authority.] ‘Where there is no concealment, misrepresentation, or other inequitable conduct by the other party, a party may not properly claim that an estoppel arises in his favor from his own omission or mistake.’: [citing authority], ‘Estoppel cannot be predicated on errors of judgment by person

2001Estoppel cannot be predicated on errors of judgment by person asking the benefit.” Price v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp., 765 A.2d 800, 808 (Pa. Super. 2000) (quoting Zitelli v. Dermatology Education & Research Foundation, 534 Pa. 360, 369-70 , 633 A.2d 134, 139-40 (1993)). (emphasis added) The plaintiffs contend that, prior to the filing of the instant action, First American raised only three defenses 6 and that First American should be limited, here, to those three defenses by virtue of equitable estoppel.

2001Estoppel cannot be predicated on errors of judgment by person asking the benefit.” Price v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp., 765 A.2d 800, 808 (Pa. Super. 2000) (quoting Zitelli v. Dermatology Education & Research Foundation, 534 Pa. 360, 369-70 , 633 A.2d 134, 139-40 (1993)). (emphasis added) The plaintiffs contend that, prior to the filing of the instant action, First American raised only three defenses 6 and that First American should be limited, here, to those three defenses by virtue of equitable estoppel.

2001Estoppel cannot be predicated on errors of judgment by person asking the benefit.” Price v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp., 765 A.2d 800, 808 (Pa. Super. 2000) (quoting Zitelli v. Dermatology Education & Research Foundation, 534 Pa. 360, 369-70 , 633 A.2d 134, 139-40 (1993)). (emphasis added) The plaintiffs contend that, prior to the filing of the instant action, First American raised only three defenses 6 and that First American should be limited, here, to those three defenses by virtue of equitable estoppel.