Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Banner v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.green1 sentence2014To sustain a one-year driver’s license suspension under the Implied Consent Law, the Department must prove that the licensee: (1) was placed under arrest for DUI by a police officer who had reasonable grounds to believe that the licensee was operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol; (2) was asked to submit to a chemical test; (3) refused to do so; and (4) was specifically warned that a refusal would result in the suspension of his driver’s license. 75 Pa. C.S. § 1547(b); Banner v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 737 A.2d 1203, 1206 (Pa. 1999); Kollar v. Depa | 1 | 1 |
Yourick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensinggreen1 sentence2014To sustain a one-year driver’s license suspension under the Implied Consent Law, the Department must prove that the licensee: (1) was placed under arrest for DUI by a police officer who had reasonable grounds to believe that the licensee was operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol; (2) was asked to submit to a chemical test; (3) refused to do so; and (4) was specifically warned that a refusal would result in the suspension of his driver’s license. 75 Pa. C.S. § 1547(b); Banner v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 737 A.2d 1203, 1206 (Pa. 1999); Kollar v. Depa | 1 | 1 |
Kollar v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensinggreen1 sentence2014To sustain a one-year driver’s license suspension under the Implied Consent Law, the Department must prove that the licensee: (1) was placed under arrest for DUI by a police officer who had reasonable grounds to believe that the licensee was operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol; (2) was asked to submit to a chemical test; (3) refused to do so; and (4) was specifically warned that a refusal would result in the suspension of his driver’s license. 75 Pa. C.S. § 1547(b); Banner v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 737 A.2d 1203, 1206 (Pa. 1999); Kollar v. Depa | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re of Fb
green
2 sentences2002Justice Castille argues that this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Cass, 551 Pa. 25 , 709 A.2d 350 (1998) (Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court, per Cappy, J.), and In the Interest of F.B., 555 Pa. 661 , 726 A.2d 361 (1999), support his conclusion that the school officers in the present case were not required to give Miranda warnings to R.H. 2002Justice Castille argues that this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Cass, 551 Pa. 25 , 709 A.2d 350 (1998) (Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court, per Cappy, J.), and In the Interest of F.B., 555 Pa. 661 , 726 A.2d 361 (1999), support his conclusion that the school officers in the present case were not required to give Miranda warnings to R.H. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Commonwealth v. Cass
green
2 sentences2002Justice Castille argues that this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Cass, 551 Pa. 25 , 709 A.2d 350 (1998) (Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court, per Cappy, J.), and In the Interest of F.B., 555 Pa. 661 , 726 A.2d 361 (1999), support his conclusion that the school officers in the present case were not required to give Miranda warnings to R.H. 2002Justice Castille argues that this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Cass, 551 Pa. 25 , 709 A.2d 350 (1998) (Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court, per Cappy, J.), and In the Interest of F.B., 555 Pa. 661 , 726 A.2d 361 (1999), support his conclusion that the school officers in the present case were not required to give Miranda warnings to R.H. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Commonwealth v. Ramos
green
2 sentences2000Still, she argues that it should. ¶ 21 Commonwealth v. Ramos, 367 Pa.Super. 84 , 532 A.2d 465 (1987), the primary case upon which Mother relies, does not advance her argument. 2000Still, she argues that it should. ¶ 21 Commonwealth v. Ramos, 367 Pa.Super. 84 , 532 A.2d 465 (1987), the primary case upon which Mother relies, does not advance her argument. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.