Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Caricogreen2 sentences2001See State v. Carico, 968 S.W.2d 280, 284-85 (Tenn. 1998); Utley, 956 S.W.2d at 495 ; Gray, 917 S.W.2d at 673 . 2001See State v. Carico, 968 S.W.2d 280, 284-85 (Tenn. 1998); Utley, 956 S.W.2d at 495 ; Gray, 917 S.W.2d at 673 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Utley
green
2 sentences2021Our supreme court reaffirmed the applicability of the Marion–Dykes rule in State v. Utley, 956 S.W.2d 489 (Tenn. 1997), noting that in “cases involving a pre-arrest delay, the due process inquiry continues to be guided by Marion.” Id. at 495 . 2021Our supreme court reaffirmed the applicability of the Marion–Dykes rule in State v. Utley, 956 S.W.2d 489 (Tenn. 1997), noting that in “cases involving a pre-arrest delay, the due process inquiry continues to be guided by Marion.” Id. at 495 . | 2 | 2001–2021 |
State v. Dykes
green
2 sentences1998Dykes, 803 S.W.2d at 257 . 4 In the case at bar, the defense's affidavit is deficient in several respects under the Dykes standard. 1998Dykes, 803 S.W.2d at 257 . 4 In the case at bar, the defense's affidavit is deficient in several respects under the Dykes standard. | 2 | 1998–2005 |
State v. Gray
green
2 sentences2001See State v. Carico, 968 S.W.2d 280, 284-85 (Tenn. 1998); Utley, 956 S.W.2d at 495 ; Gray, 917 S.W.2d at 673 . 2001See State v. Carico, 968 S.W.2d 280, 284-85 (Tenn. 1998); Utley, 956 S.W.2d at 495 ; Gray, 917 S.W.2d at 673 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
United States v. Marion
green
2 sentences2001I note that Dykes relies on United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 , 92 S. Ct. 455 (1971) to devise the test. 2001I note that Dykes relies on United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 , 92 S. Ct. 455 (1971) to devise the test. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.