Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James Heflin v. Iberiabank Corporationgreen2 sentences2021See Heflin v. Iberiabank Corp., 571 S.W.3d 727, 737 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss a negligent hiring claim where plaintiff did not allege employee “had a criminal history or record of misbehavior that would have disqualified her from being hired”). 2019A negligent hiring claim requires a plaintiff to establish “in addition to the elements of a negligence claim, that the employer had knowledge of the employee’s unfitness for the job.” Heflin v. Iberiabank Corp., 571 S.W.3d 727, 737 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018) (quoting Bazemore v. Performance Food Grp., Inc., 478 S.W.3d 628, 638-39 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015)), perm. app. denied, (Tenn. June 8, 2018). | 2 | 2 |
Marshalls of Nashville, Tennessee, Inc. v. Harding Mall Associates, Ltd.green1 sentence2019To establish a negligent hiring claim in the selection of an independent contractor, a plaintiff must show “that the employer either knew, or by the exercise of reasonable care might have ascertained, that the independent contractor was not qualified to perform the work for which he was contracted.” Marshalls of Nashville, Tenn., Inc. v. Harding Mall Assocs., Ltd., 799 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
Byrd v. Hallgreen1 sentence2019“The courts must deny a motion for summary judgment if any doubt exists with regard to the facts or the conclusions to be drawn from the facts.” Id. (citing Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tenn. 1993)). | 1 | 1 |
Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.green1 sentence2019In the context of trespass, the Tennessee Supreme Court has also allowed punitive damages where “the trespass is accomplished fraudulently, wantonly, oppressively, or with gross negligence.” Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Commc’ns Co., 924 S.W.2d 632, 642 (Tenn. 1996).7 6 In Plaintiff’s reply brief, Plaintiff also asserts that negligent entrustment occurred because, due to spoliation, the jury could draw a negative inference that the tractor-trailer was not in good working order, or that the jury could have considered Land South’s failure to maintain records with regard to the negligent hiring claim. | 1 | 1 |
Doe v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of Memphisgreen1 sentence2019Our courts “recognize the negligence of an employer in the selection and retention of . . . independent contractors.” Doe v. Catholic Bishop for Diocese of Memphis, 306 S.W.3d 712, 717 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Patricia Bazemore v. Performance Food Group, Inc.green1 sentence2019A negligent hiring claim requires a plaintiff to establish “in addition to the elements of a negligence claim, that the employer had knowledge of the employee’s unfitness for the job.” Heflin v. Iberiabank Corp., 571 S.W.3d 727, 737 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018) (quoting Bazemore v. Performance Food Grp., Inc., 478 S.W.3d 628, 638-39 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015)), perm. app. denied, (Tenn. June 8, 2018). | 1 | 1 |
Roberts v. Blount Memorial Hospitalgreen1 sentence2000As previously indicated, our decision in Roberts v. Blount Memorial Hospital, 963 S.W.2d 744, 748 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997), suggested that, although the plaintiff could not recover under the GTLA for a hospital employee’s intentional tort (sexual assault), the plaintiff might be able to recover for the hospital’s independent negligence in failing to adequately investigate the employee’s background before hiring him. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jonathan Fitzrandolph Zink v. Rural Metro of Tennessee, L.P.
green
2 sentences2019The trial court concluded that Plaintiff conceded the negligent hiring claim, that the waiver of liability was not enforceable, and that the THCLA required Plaintiff to file a certificate of good faith with her complaint in this case. -4- Id. 2019“The courts must deny a motion for summary judgment if any doubt exists with regard to the facts or the conclusions to be drawn from the facts.” Id. (citing Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tenn. 1993)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.