quo warranto challenge (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

quo warranto challenge in Tennessee

5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State Ex Rel. Tipton v. City of Knoxvillegreen
tennctapp · 2006 · cited in 2 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2009–2013
2 sentences

2013See Tipton, 205 S.W.3d at 460 (discussing “significant differences” in quo warranto procedures under the 1998 Amendments and the “older framework”).

2009See Tipton, 205 S.W.3d at 460 (discussing “significant differences” in quo warranto procedures under the 1998 Amendments and the “older framework”).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Bennett v. Stutts green
tenn · 1975
2 sentences

2012Id.

2012Id.

22012–2012
City of Oak Ridge v. Roane County green
tenn · 1978
1 sentence

2013A quo warranto challenge must be made within “thirty days after the operative date of the ordinance,” because thereafter, “the courts have no jurisdiction of such suits.” City of Oak Ridge, 563 S.W.2d at 898 .

12013–2013

Where else courts name it

OH 5 (1896–2025) TN 5 (2009–2013) TX 4 (1998–2009) FL 3 (1976–2024) AZ 3 (2007–2025) MI 2 (2022–2024) IL 2 (1905–2026) AL 2 (1978–2010) PA 2 (1948–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check