seventh assignment error in Tennessee

1964In Cowley v. State, 78 Tenn. 282 , the defendant was indicted and convicted of an assault on William Gr.

1955With reference to the correctness of the trial judge’s having granted a motion for a directed verdict against the will, wMch question is presented by the eighth assignment of error, it is evident from the record before ns that he felt that the situation was controlled by the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Lawrence v. Lawrence, 35 Tenn. App. 648 , 250 S. W. (2d) 781 , — the opinion in that case having been written by Hickerson, J.

1955With reference to the correctness of the trial judge’s having granted a motion for a directed verdict against the will, wMch question is presented by the eighth assignment of error, it is evident from the record before ns that he felt that the situation was controlled by the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Lawrence v. Lawrence, 35 Tenn. App. 648 , 250 S. W. (2d) 781 , — the opinion in that case having been written by Hickerson, J.

1944R. 1548: “Insurance against loss or damage from accident or negligent conduct is so universal that jurors, as well as courts, must he assumed to be cognizant of this fact, and hence the evidence thereof will not he as likely to create prejudice as it might have been before this method of business became so universal. ’ ’ Again, the question was before the court in the case of Potts v. Leigh, 15 Tenn. App. 1, 5 .

1937The petition calls our attention to the opinions of our Supreme Court in the cases of Conaway v. New York Life Insurance Co. et al., February 27, 1937, 171 Tenn., 290 , 102 S. W. (2d), 66 ; and Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Guess et al., January 16, 1937, 171 Tenn., 205 , 101 S. W. (2d), 694 , which opinions had not been published when the briefs in the instant ease were filed, and our attention had not been directed to these opinion when our former opinion was prepared.

1937The petition calls our attention to the opinions of our Supreme Court in the cases of Conaway v. New York Life Insurance Co. et al., February 27, 1937, 171 Tenn., 290 , 102 S. W. (2d), 66 ; and Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Guess et al., January 16, 1937, 171 Tenn., 205 , 101 S. W. (2d), 694 , which opinions had not been published when the briefs in the instant ease were filed, and our attention had not been directed to these opinion when our former opinion was prepared.

1937In Lake County v. Morris, 160 Tenn., 619 , 28 S. W. (2d), 351, 353 , we held “that a duly certified copy of delinquent assessments, taken from the roll on file in the office of the trustee of Lake county, and *626 authenticated by that official, was sufficient evidence to justify the decrees of the chancellor in the absence of any other proof.” To the same effect see State v. Collier, 165 Tenn., 28 , 52 S. W. (2d), 361 .

1937In Lake County v. Morris, 160 Tenn., 619 , 28 S. W. (2d), 351, 353 , we held “that a duly certified copy of delinquent assessments, taken from the roll on file in the office of the trustee of Lake county, and *626 authenticated by that official, was sufficient evidence to justify the decrees of the chancellor in the absence of any other proof.” To the same effect see State v. Collier, 165 Tenn., 28 , 52 S. W. (2d), 361 .

1937In Lake County v. Morris, 160 Tenn., 619 , 28 S. W. (2d), 351, 353 , we held “that a duly certified copy of delinquent assessments, taken from the roll on file in the office of the trustee of Lake county, and *626 authenticated by that official, was sufficient evidence to justify the decrees of the chancellor in the absence of any other proof.” To the same effect see State v. Collier, 165 Tenn., 28 , 52 S. W. (2d), 361 .

1937In Lake County v. Morris, 160 Tenn., 619 , 28 S. W. (2d), 351, 353 , we held “that a duly certified copy of delinquent assessments, taken from the roll on file in the office of the trustee of Lake county, and *626 authenticated by that official, was sufficient evidence to justify the decrees of the chancellor in the absence of any other proof.” To the same effect see State v. Collier, 165 Tenn., 28 , 52 S. W. (2d), 361 .

1937The petition calls our attention to the opinions of our Supreme Court in the cases of Conaway v. New York Life Insurance Co. et al., February 27, 1937, 171 Tenn., 290 , 102 S. W. (2d), 66 ; and Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Guess et al., January 16, 1937, 171 Tenn., 205 , 101 S. W. (2d), 694 , which opinions had not been published when the briefs in the instant ease were filed, and our attention had not been directed to these opinion when our former opinion was prepared.

1937The petition calls our attention to the opinions of our Supreme Court in the cases of Conaway v. New York Life Insurance Co. et al., February 27, 1937, 171 Tenn., 290 , 102 S. W. (2d), 66 ; and Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Guess et al., January 16, 1937, 171 Tenn., 205 , 101 S. W. (2d), 694 , which opinions had not been published when the briefs in the instant ease were filed, and our attention had not been directed to these opinion when our former opinion was prepared.