Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Colyer v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Our supreme court has held that Code section 37-1-127(c) “guarantees only that a juvenile’s statements taken in violation of T.C.A. § 37-1-115 will not be used against him or her in a proceeding in juvenile court.” State v. Lundy, 808 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tenn. 1991) (citing Colyer v. State, 577 S.W.2d 460, 462 (Tenn. 1979); State v. Turnmire, 762 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn. Crim. 1998This rule has been interpreted to mean that "§ 37-1-127(c) guarantees only that a juvenile's statements taken in violation of § 37-1-115 will not be used against him or her in a proceeding in juvenile court." State v. Lundy, 808 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tenn. 1991) (citing Coyler v. State, 577 S.W.2d 460, 462 (Tenn. 1979)). | 5 | 5 |
State v. Lundygreen2 sentences2016Our supreme court has held that Code section 37-1-127(c) “guarantees only that a juvenile’s statements taken in violation of T.C.A. § 37-1-115 will not be used against him or her in a proceeding in juvenile court.” State v. Lundy, 808 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tenn. 1991) (citing Colyer v. State, 577 S.W.2d 460, 462 (Tenn. 1979); State v. Turnmire, 762 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn. Crim. 1998This rule has been interpreted to mean that "§ 37-1-127(c) guarantees only that a juvenile's statements taken in violation of § 37-1-115 will not be used against him or her in a proceeding in juvenile court." State v. Lundy, 808 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tenn. 1991) (citing Coyler v. State, 577 S.W.2d 460, 462 (Tenn. 1979)). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Turnmiregreen2 sentences2016Our supreme court has held that Code section 37-1-127(c) “guarantees only that a juvenile’s statements taken in violation of T.C.A. § 37-1-115 will not be used against him or her in a proceeding in juvenile court.” State v. Lundy, 808 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tenn. 1991) (citing Colyer v. State, 577 S.W.2d 460, 462 (Tenn. 1979); State v. Turnmire, 762 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn. Crim. 1991Colyer v. State, 577 S.W.2d 460, 462 (Tenn.1979); see also State v. Turnmire, 762 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn.Crim.App.1988). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Carrollgreen1 sentence2016App. 1988)) (emphasis added); see also State v. Carroll, 36 S.W.3d 854, 862 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.