Sanchez motion (Utah) · Go Syfert
← Utah issues

Sanchez motion in Utah

5 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Ogdengreen
utah · 2018 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025See State v. Ogden, 2018 UT 8, ¶ 2 , 416 P.3d 1132 . ¶19 Regarding Sanchez’s claim of ineffective assistance related to counsel’s advice that he plead guilty when there was allegedly undisclosed exculpatory video evidence, the district court determined that it was procedurally barred because the issue had already been raised before this court and the supreme court.

2025See State v. Ogden, 2018 UT 8, ¶ 2 , 416 P.3d 1132 . ¶19 Regarding Sanchez’s claim of ineffective assistance related to counsel’s advice that he plead guilty when there was allegedly undisclosed exculpatory video evidence, the district court determined that it was procedurally barred because the issue had already been raised before this court and the supreme court.

11
State v. Moreaugreen
utahctapp · 2011 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015See State v. Moreau, 2011 UT App 109, ¶ 6 , 255 P.3d 689 (alteration in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). ¶18 Having determined that the trial court properly denied Sanchez’s motion for a section 402 reduction, I would not reach Sanchez’s argument that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him.

2015See State v. Moreau, 2011 UT App 109, ¶ 6 , 255 P.3d 689 (alteration in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). ¶18 Having determined that the trial court properly denied Sanchez’s motion for a section 402 reduction, I would not reach Sanchez’s argument that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Sanchez green
utahctapp · 2020
2 sentences

2025Id.

2020We also conclude that any alleged inaccuracies in the warrant affidavit were inconsequential to the issuance of the warrant. ¶26 Affirmed. 20190250-CA 12 2020 UT App 158

22020–2025
Modes v. State green
utahctapp · 2023
2 sentences

2025Accordingly, Sanchez pled his grounds under section 78B-9-106(3)(a) of the Utah Code, 20230163-CA 12 2025 UT App 78 Sanchez v. State which states, “[A] petitioner may be eligible for relief on a basis that the ground could have been but was not raised in the trial court, at trial, or on appeal, if the failure to raise that ground was due to ineffective assistance of counsel.” See also Modes v. State, 2023 UT App 104, ¶ 19 , 537 P.3d 265 (“If any of the . . . claims that the district court dismissed because they could have been raised on direct appeal were not raised there due to the ineffectiv

2025Accordingly, Sanchez pled his grounds under section 78B-9-106(3)(a) of the Utah Code, 20230163-CA 12 2025 UT App 78 Sanchez v. State which states, “[A] petitioner may be eligible for relief on a basis that the ground could have been but was not raised in the trial court, at trial, or on appeal, if the failure to raise that ground was due to ineffective assistance of counsel.” See also Modes v. State, 2023 UT App 104, ¶ 19 , 537 P.3d 265 (“If any of the . . . claims that the district court dismissed because they could have been raised on direct appeal were not raised there due to the ineffectiv

12025–2025
Sanchez v. State green
utahctapp · 2025
2 sentences

2025Accordingly, Sanchez pled his grounds under section 78B-9-106(3)(a) of the Utah Code, 20230163-CA 12 2025 UT App 78 Sanchez v. State which states, “[A] petitioner may be eligible for relief on a basis that the ground could have been but was not raised in the trial court, at trial, or on appeal, if the failure to raise that ground was due to ineffective assistance of counsel.” See also Modes v. State, 2023 UT App 104, ¶ 19 , 537 P.3d 265 (“If any of the . . . claims that the district court dismissed because they could have been raised on direct appeal were not raised there due to the ineffectiv

2025And its conclusion that Sanchez’s ineffective assistance claims were procedurally barred was in error. ¶24 Reversed and remanded. 20230163-CA 13 2025 UT App 78

12025–2025
State v. Sanchez green
utahctapp · 2016
2 sentences

2018State v. Sanchez , 2016 UT App 189 , ¶¶ 18, 30-31, 380 P.3d 375 .

2018State v. Sanchez , 2016 UT App 189 , ¶¶ 18, 30-31, 380 P.3d 375 .

12018–2018
State v. Sanchez green
utahctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2015The trial court denied that motion, concluding that entering the conviction as a class A misdemeanor would not be “unduly harsh.” See id. § 76-3-402(1). ¶17 I agree with the lead opinion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Sanchez’s motion for a section 402 reduction.

12015–2015
Davis & Sanchez, PLLC v. University of Utah Health Care green
utahctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2015Thus, the court of appeals held that "the law firm should have filed an application with the Labor Commission for an award of attorney fees payable by the hospital," and it affirmed the dismissal of the Davis & Sanchez claim on the basis of "[t]he law firm's failure to first raise its attorney fee claim against the hospital before the Labor Commission." Id. 11 7, 9. {4 The firm did not seek review of that decision on certiorari in this court.

12015–2015

Where else courts name it

CA 127 (1970–2026) TX 47 (1981–2025) WA 12 (1985–2024) FL 8 (1984–2024) NY 8 (2004–2024) NJ 6 (1979–2009) OH 6 (2007–2026) UT 5 (2015–2025) WY 4 (2010–2023) MN 4 (2012–2024) AZ 4 (1999–2018) NM 4 (1982–2021) ID 3 (2011–2024) PA 3 (2017–2023) VA 3 (2003–2009) MD 2 (1989–2011) IL 2 (2026–2026) IN 2 (2000–2006) GA 2 (2011–2020) MO 2 (2005–2008) NV 2 (2014–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check