Sanchez analysis (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

Sanchez analysis in Washington

12 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Grahamgreen
wash · 2014 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See Majority at 8-9. 5 The majority demonstrates its misunderstanding of the mitigating factor in its discussion of State v. Graham, 181 Wn.2d 878,887 , 337 P.3d 319 (2014).

2019See Majority at 8-9. 5 The majority demonstrates its misunderstanding of the mitigating factor in its discussion of State v. Graham, 181 Wn.2d 878,887 , 337 P.3d 319 (2014).

22
State v. Eastmondgreen
wash · 1996 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004See Eastmond, 129 Wash.2d at 502-03 , 919 P.2d 577 .

2004See Eastmond, 129 Wn.2d at 502-03 .

22
State v. Eastmondgreen
wash · 1996 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004See Eastmond, 129 Wash.2d at 502-03 , 919 P.2d 577 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Finch v. Wieder green
washctapp · 2012
2 sentences

2024Jackson’s actual 24 No. 83686-2-I/25 testimony was that “[u]nless Detective O’Keefe found it necessary to move something, moving in the room for the canvas or the photos, at this point nothing’s been moved.” In other words, he testified that the photos showed the room in its untouched state, with the caveat that something may have been moved if “necessary.” Moreover, even setting aside the otherwise highly speculative nature of this claim, “this court defers to the trier of fact for resolution of conflicting testimony, evaluation of the evidence’s persuasiveness, and assessment of the witnesse

2024Jackson’s actual 24 No. 83686-2-I/25 testimony was that “[u]nless Detective O’Keefe found it necessary to move something, moving in the room for the canvas or the photos, at this point nothing’s been moved.” In other words, he testified that the photos showed the room in its untouched state, with the caveat that something may have been moved if “necessary.” Moreover, even setting aside the otherwise highly speculative nature of this claim, “this court defers to the trier of fact for resolution of conflicting testimony, evaluation of the evidence’s persuasiveness, and assessment of the witnesse

22024–2024
State v. Hortman green
washctapp · 1994
2 sentences

2004Hortman, 76 Wash.App. at 463-64 , 886 P.2d 234 .

2004Hortman, 76 Wash.App. at 463-64 , 886 P.2d 234 .

22003–2004
State v. Calvert green
washctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2004In State v. Calvert, 79 Wash.App. 569 , 903 P.2d 1003 (1995), this court applied the Sanchez test for the first time in a check forgery case under RCW 9A.60.020.

2004In State v. Calvert, 79 Wash.App. 569 , 903 P.2d 1003 (1995), this court applied the Sanchez test for the first time in a check forgery case under RCW 9A.60.020.

22003–2004
State v. Batista green
wash · 1991
2 sentences

2004It is useful to recall that the Sanchez analysis proceeds from the decision in State v. Batista, 116 Wash.2d 777 , 808 P.2d 1141 (1991), in which the court considered whether the multiple offense policy resulted in a sentence that was clearly too lenient.

2004It is useful to recall that the Sanchez analysis proceeds from the decision in State v. Batista, 116 Wash.2d 777 , 808 P.2d 1141 (1991), in which the court considered whether the multiple offense policy resulted in a sentence that was clearly too lenient.

22003–2004
Martin v. Gonzaga Univ. green
wash · 2018
2 sentences

2019Martin v. Gonzaga Univ., 191 Wn.2d 712, 725-26 , 425 P.3d 837 (2018).

2019Martin v. Gonzaga Univ., 191 Wn.2d 712, 725-26 , 425 P.3d 837 (2018).

12019–2019
Hamilton v. Alabama green
scotus · 1961
1 sentence

2017In finding Hamilton controlling and reversing the judgment without considering prejudice, the Court reasoned that “ ‘[o]nly the presence of counsel could have enabled this accused to know all the defenses available to him and to plead intelligently.’ ” Id. (quoting Hamilton, 368 U.S. at 55 ). 1 ¶28 As illustrated by the above-cited United States Supreme Court cases, the characterization of Sanchez’s hearing as an arraignment is not determinative of whether the hearing was a critical stage so that defense counsel’s absence was presumptively prejudicial.

12017–2017
White v. Maryland green
scotus · 1963
1 sentence

2017In finding Hamilton controlling and reversing the judgment without considering prejudice, the Court reasoned that “ ‘[o]nly the presence of counsel could have enabled this accused to know all the defenses available to him and to plead intelligently.’ ” Id. (quoting Hamilton, 368 U.S. at 55 ). 1 ¶28 As illustrated by the above-cited United States Supreme Court cases, the characterization of Sanchez’s hearing as an arraignment is not determinative of whether the hearing was a critical stage so that defense counsel’s absence was presumptively prejudicial.

12017–2017
State v. Grande green
wash · 2008
1 sentence

2016Grande, 164 Wn.2d at 146 .

12016–2016
Thomas v. French green
wash · 1983
2 sentences

1985RAP 10.4(c); Thomas v. French, 99 Wn.2d 95 , 659 P.2d 1097 (1983).

1985RAP 10.4(c); Thomas v. French, 99 Wn.2d 95 , 659 P.2d 1097 (1983).

11985–1985

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (7) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.010 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.535 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.589 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 127 (1970–2026) TX 47 (1981–2025) WA 12 (1985–2024) FL 8 (1984–2024) NY 8 (2004–2024) NJ 6 (1979–2009) OH 6 (2007–2026) UT 5 (2015–2025) WY 4 (2010–2023) MN 4 (2012–2024) AZ 4 (1999–2018) NM 4 (1982–2021) ID 3 (2011–2024) PA 3 (2017–2023) VA 3 (2003–2009) MD 2 (1989–2011) IL 2 (2026–2026) IN 2 (2000–2006) GA 2 (2011–2020) MO 2 (2005–2008) NV 2 (2014–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check