Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hansen v. Rothaus
green
2 sentences2007A liquidated claim exists when “the amount of prejudgment interest can be determined from the evidence with exactness and without reliance on opinion or discretion.” Bostain, 159 Wn.2d at 723 (citing Hansen, 107 Wn.2d at 472 ). “ ‘A dispute over the claim, in whole or in part, does not change the character of a liquidated claim to unliquidated.’ ” Id. (quoting Hansen, 107 Wn.2d at 472 ). 2007A liquidated claim exists when “the amount of prejudgment interest can be determined from the evidence with exactness and without reliance on opinion or discretion.” Bostain, 159 Wn.2d at 723 (citing Hansen, 107 Wn.2d at 472 ). “ ‘A dispute over the claim, in whole or in part, does not change the character of a liquidated claim to unliquidated.’ ” Id. (quoting Hansen, 107 Wn.2d at 472 ). | 3 | 2007–2007 |
Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.
green
2 sentences2007“A dispute over the claim, in whole or in part, does not change the character of a liquidated claim to unliquidated.” Id. (citing Frier, 74 Wn.2d at 33 (citing Charles T. 2007“A dispute over the claim, in whole or in part, does not change the character of a liquidated claim to unliquidated.” Id. (citing Frier, 74 Wn.2d at 33 (citing Charles T. | 2 | 1988–2007 |
Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.
green
2 sentences2007A liquidated claim exists when "the amount of prejudgment interest can be determined from the evidence with exactness and without reliance on opinion or discretion." Bostain, 159 Wash.2d at 723 , 153 P.3d 846 (citing Hansen, 107 Wash.2d at 472 , 730 P.2d 662 ). "`A dispute over the claim, in whole or in part, does not change the character of a liquidated claim to unliquidated.'" Id. (quoting Hansen, 107 Wash.2d at 472 , 730 P.2d 662 ). 2007A liquidated claim exists when “the amount of prejudgment interest can be determined from the evidence with exactness and without reliance on opinion or discretion.” Bostain, 159 Wn.2d at 723 (citing Hansen, 107 Wn.2d at 472 ). “ ‘A dispute over the claim, in whole or in part, does not change the character of a liquidated claim to unliquidated.’ ” Id. (quoting Hansen, 107 Wn.2d at 472 ). | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.
green
1 sentence2007A liquidated claim exists when "the amount of prejudgment interest can be determined from the evidence with exactness and without reliance on opinion or discretion." Bostain, 159 Wash.2d at 723 , 153 P.3d 846 (citing Hansen, 107 Wash.2d at 472 , 730 P.2d 662 ). "`A dispute over the claim, in whole or in part, does not change the character of a liquidated claim to unliquidated.'" Id. (quoting Hansen, 107 Wash.2d at 472 , 730 P.2d 662 ). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.