Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1920–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Krollgreen2 sentences1977Accord, State v. Kroll, 87 Wn.2d 829 , 558 P.2d 173 (1976). 1977Accord, State v. Kroll, 87 Wn.2d 829 , 558 P.2d 173 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Massey
green
2 sentences1994State v. Massey, 68 Wn.2d 88, 92 , 411 P.2d 422 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 904 (1966). 1994State v. Massey, 68 Wn.2d 88, 92 , 411 P.2d 422 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 904 (1966). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Massey v. Washington
green
1 sentence1994State v. Massey, 68 Wn.2d 88, 92 , 411 P.2d 422 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 904 (1966). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
McMullen v. Warren Motor Co.
green
2 sentences1942In McMullen v. Warren Motor Co., 174 Wash. 454 , 25 P. (2d) 99 , this court announced the rule in the following language: “When the respondent showed that the appellant was the owner of the automobile, they made a prima facie case to the effect that, at the time of the accident, the vehicle was in the possession of the owner, and that whoevér was driving it was doing so for such owner. 1942In McMullen v. Warren Motor Co., 174 Wash. 454 , 25 P. (2d) 99 , this court announced the rule in the following language: “When the respondent showed that the appellant was the owner of the automobile, they made a prima facie case to the effect that, at the time of the accident, the vehicle was in the possession of the owner, and that whoevér was driving it was doing so for such owner. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Samuels v. Hiawatha Holstein Dairy Co.
neutral
2 sentences1933Samuels v. Hiawatha Holstein Dairy Co., 115 Wash. 343 , 197 Pac. 24 ; Barach v. Island Empire Tel. & Tel. 1933Samuels v. Hiawatha Holstein Dairy Co., 115 Wash. 343 , 197 Pac. 24 ; Barach v. Island Empire Tel. & Tel. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
State v. Tilden
neutral
2 sentences1920A. (N. S.) 173; State v. Tilden, 79 Wash. 472 , 140 Pac. 680 . (9) The court instructed the jury that: “Every female person is presumed to be of chaste character, and this presumption must be accorded to Ruth Garrison in this case until such time as the defendant shall prove, by specific acts of sexual intercourse committed prior to the date alleged in the information, that the said Ruth Garrison was physically unchaste.” Particular complaint is made of that portion of this instruction which requires the defendant to overcome the presumption of chastity by proof of “specific acts of sexual int 1920A. (N. S.) 173; State v. Tilden, 79 Wash. 472 , 140 Pac. 680 . (9) The court instructed the jury that: “Every female person is presumed to be of chaste character, and this presumption must be accorded to Ruth Garrison in this case until such time as the defendant shall prove, by specific acts of sexual intercourse committed prior to the date alleged in the information, that the said Ruth Garrison was physically unchaste.” Particular complaint is made of that portion of this instruction which requires the defendant to overcome the presumption of chastity by proof of “specific acts of sexual int | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.