house rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

house rule in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Squires v. McLaughlingreen
wash · 1953 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016She immediately added, “But once we went over the Ferrier it was exactly those words, yes.” Id. at 304. ¶28 The trial court then heard argument of counsel, which included this colloquy with defense counsel: JUDGE: The Ferrier case itself and I think the language is, before entering the house the warnings have to be given. [DEFENSE COUNSEL] DEYOUNG: Right.

11
Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. Bassogreen
fladistctapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013App. at 757 (quoting Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. Basso, 393 So. 2d 637, 640 (Fla. Dist.

11
Harold B. Dorman v. United Statesgreen
cadc · 1970 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
1 sentence

1990Terrovona, 105 Wn.2d at 644 (citing Dorman v. United States, 435 F.2d 385, 392-93 (D.C.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Peltier green
wash · 2014
1 sentence

2021Peltier, 181 Wn.2d at 296 .

12021–2021
Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. Sadri green
washctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2013Sadri, 92 Wn.

2013A house rule has a reasonable purpose when it is one that is "` easonably related to the promotion of the r and health, happiness[,] peace of mind of the unit owners. "' Sadri, 92 Wn.

12013–2013
State v. Terrovona green
wash · 1986
1 sentence

1990Terrovona, 105 Wn.2d at 644 (citing Dorman v. United States, 435 F.2d 385, 392-93 (D.C.

11990–1990
State v. Bean green
wash · 1978
2 sentences

1984We are mindful that close scrutiny of the totality of the circumstances said to justify a warrantless search of a house under the doctrine of exigent circumstances is required in view of the alternatives either to (1) guard the premises while a warrant is sought, State v. Counts, supra, or (2) apply for a telephonic warrant, State v. Bean, 89 Wn.2d 467, 472 , 572 P.2d 1102 (1978); CrR 2.3(c).

1984We are mindful that close scrutiny of the totality of the circumstances said to justify a warrantless search of a house under the doctrine of exigent circumstances is required in view of the alternatives either to (1) guard the premises while a warrant is sought, State v. Counts, supra, or (2) apply for a telephonic warrant, State v. Bean, 89 Wn.2d 467, 472 , 572 P.2d 1102 (1978); CrR 2.3(c).

11984–1984

Where else courts name it

NY 15 (1933–2026) GA 10 (1899–2017) IL 9 (1964–2022) CA 8 (1936–2017) MO 7 (1902–2024) LA 6 (1976–2015) WA 5 (1984–2021) IN 4 (1971–2018) FL 4 (1982–2015) OH 3 (1999–2024) MD 3 (1947–2025) DC 3 (1980–1999) VA 3 (1998–2002) OR 3 (2001–2021) AL 2 (1998–2010) MA 2 (2007–2018) NJ 2 (1978–1995) NV 2 (2013–2013) MT 2 (2015–2024) KS 2 (1975–1992) TX 2 (1939–2024) CO 2 (2003–2007) MN 2 (1954–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check