judicially crafted exception (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

judicially crafted exception in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Ottis v. Stevenson-Carson School District No. 303green
washctapp · 1991 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004App. 747, 759 , 812 P.2d 133 (1991) (“this judicially crafted exception . .. has never been extended to civil cases”).

2004No. 303, 61 Wash.App. 747, 759 , 812 P.2d 133 (1991) ("this judicially crafted exception ... has never been extended to civil cases"). [50] Brief of State/Lakeside Indus. at 11 (italics deleted from original). [51] Br. of State/Lakeside Indus. at 15. [52] Br. of Appellant at 29. [53] Br. of Appellant at 33 (bolding deleted from original). [54] RP (May 21, 2001) at 35-36. [55] 2 Wash.App. 399 , 467 P.2d 854 , review denied, 78 Wash.2d 993 (1970). [56] 2 Wash.App. at 401 , 467 P.2d 854 . [57] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [58] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [59] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 4

12
Harris v. Montanagreen
mont · 2013 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Unlike Washington' s Birklid test, however, the Montana Supreme Court appears to have injected an additional judicially crafted requirement into Montana' s scheme when it also held that Harris had " failed to provide any evidence from which it] can infer that the [ Department of Correction' s] intent was to harm rather than educate and train." Harris, 368 Mont. at 284 ( emphasis added). 10 No. 44035 -1 - II Wn.2d at 865).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Michelbrink v. Washington State Patrol green
washctapp · 2014
1 sentence

2015Michelbrink I, 180 Wn.

12015–2015
Gabel v. Koba green
washctapp · 1969
2 sentences

2004No. 303, 61 Wash.App. 747, 759 , 812 P.2d 133 (1991) ("this judicially crafted exception ... has never been extended to civil cases"). [50] Brief of State/Lakeside Indus. at 11 (italics deleted from original). [51] Br. of State/Lakeside Indus. at 15. [52] Br. of Appellant at 29. [53] Br. of Appellant at 33 (bolding deleted from original). [54] RP (May 21, 2001) at 35-36. [55] 2 Wash.App. 399 , 467 P.2d 854 , review denied, 78 Wash.2d 993 (1970). [56] 2 Wash.App. at 401 , 467 P.2d 854 . [57] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [58] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [59] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 4

2004No. 303, 61 Wash.App. 747, 759 , 812 P.2d 133 (1991) ("this judicially crafted exception ... has never been extended to civil cases"). [50] Brief of State/Lakeside Indus. at 11 (italics deleted from original). [51] Br. of State/Lakeside Indus. at 15. [52] Br. of Appellant at 29. [53] Br. of Appellant at 33 (bolding deleted from original). [54] RP (May 21, 2001) at 35-36. [55] 2 Wash.App. 399 , 467 P.2d 854 , review denied, 78 Wash.2d 993 (1970). [56] 2 Wash.App. at 401 , 467 P.2d 854 . [57] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [58] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [59] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 4

12004–2004
Stark v. Allis-Chalmers green
washctapp · 1970
2 sentences

2004No. 303, 61 Wash.App. 747, 759 , 812 P.2d 133 (1991) ("this judicially crafted exception ... has never been extended to civil cases"). [50] Brief of State/Lakeside Indus. at 11 (italics deleted from original). [51] Br. of State/Lakeside Indus. at 15. [52] Br. of Appellant at 29. [53] Br. of Appellant at 33 (bolding deleted from original). [54] RP (May 21, 2001) at 35-36. [55] 2 Wash.App. 399 , 467 P.2d 854 , review denied, 78 Wash.2d 993 (1970). [56] 2 Wash.App. at 401 , 467 P.2d 854 . [57] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [58] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [59] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 4

2004No. 303, 61 Wash.App. 747, 759 , 812 P.2d 133 (1991) ("this judicially crafted exception ... has never been extended to civil cases"). [50] Brief of State/Lakeside Indus. at 11 (italics deleted from original). [51] Br. of State/Lakeside Indus. at 15. [52] Br. of Appellant at 29. [53] Br. of Appellant at 33 (bolding deleted from original). [54] RP (May 21, 2001) at 35-36. [55] 2 Wash.App. 399 , 467 P.2d 854 , review denied, 78 Wash.2d 993 (1970). [56] 2 Wash.App. at 401 , 467 P.2d 854 . [57] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [58] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 467 P.2d 854 . [59] 2 Wash.App. at 406 , 4

12004–2004
State v. Johnson green
washctapp · 1985
1 sentence

1991Thus, in State v. Johnson, 42 Wn.

11991–1991
State v. Biles neutral
wash · 1893
1 sentence

1991A party making a particular challenge for cause is required to state the grounds therefor, State v. Biles, 6 Wash. 186, 188 , 33 P. 347 (1893); Gray v. Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648 , 95 L.

11991–1991
Thompson v. McDonald neutral
wash · 1893
1 sentence

1991A party making a particular challenge for cause is required to state the grounds therefor, State v. Biles, 6 Wash. 186, 188 , 33 P. 347 (1893); Gray v. Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648 , 95 L.

11991–1991
Gray v. Mississippi green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

1991A party making a particular challenge for cause is required to state the grounds therefor, State v. Biles, 6 Wash. 186, 188 , 33 P. 347 (1893); Gray v. Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648 , 95 L.

1991A party making a particular challenge for cause is required to state the grounds therefor, State v. Biles, 6 Wash. 186, 188 , 33 P. 347 (1893); Gray v. Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648 , 95 L.

11991–1991

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.130 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.150 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.170 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.180 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NH 25 (1992–2025) CA 12 (1988–2026) UT 6 (2002–2015) TX 6 (1998–2015) NY 5 (1989–2003) WA 5 (1991–2015) OK 4 (1995–2014) NJ 3 (2009–2025) PA 3 (2007–2011) CO 2 (2002–2026) IN 2 (2024–2025) MD 2 (1997–2011) CT 2 (1998–2017) MI 2 (2015–2023) LA 2 (1995–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check