testimony and no further instruction (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

testimony and no further instruction in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Stackhouse green
washctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2019“When an objection is sustained with no further motion to strike the testimony and no further instruction for the jury to disregard the testimony, the testimony remains in the record for the jury’s consideration.” State v. Stackhouse, 90 Wn.

2017"When an objection is sustained with no further motion to strike the testimony and no further instruction for the jury to disregard the testimony, the testimony remains in the record for the jury's consideration." State v. Stackhouse, 90 Wn.

32014–2019
State v. Swan green
wash · 1990
2 sentences

2023State v. Swan, 114 Wn.2d 613, 659 , 790 P.2d 610 (1990).

2023State v. Swan, 114 Wn.2d 613, 659 , 790 P.2d 610 (1990).

21998–2023

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check