Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Granzer v. Stategreen2 sentences2023However, I respectfully dissent from Part II because Mr. Person was prejudiced when the district court misled the jury by giving a general intent instruction for the specific intent crime of stalking. [¶103] I agree with the majority that the district court’s instruction on general intent is a trial error that “must be prejudicial to constitute reversible error.” Schuerman v. State, 2022 WY 160, ¶ 7 , 522 P.3d 145, 148 (Wyo. 2022) (quoting Schmuck v. State, 2017 WY 140, ¶ 45 , 406 P.3d 286, 301 (Wyo. 2017)); Granzer v. State, 2008 WY 118, ¶18 , 193 P.3d 266 , 271–72 (Wyo. 2008) (“[A] trial cou 2023However, I respectfully dissent from Part II because Mr. Person was prejudiced when the district court misled the jury by giving a general intent instruction for the specific intent crime of stalking. [¶103] I agree with the majority that the district court’s instruction on general intent is a trial error that “must be prejudicial to constitute reversible error.” Schuerman v. State, 2022 WY 160, ¶ 7 , 522 P.3d 145, 148 (Wyo. 2022) (quoting Schmuck v. State, 2017 WY 140, ¶ 45 , 406 P.3d 286, 301 (Wyo. 2017)); Granzer v. State, 2008 WY 118, ¶18 , 193 P.3d 266 , 271–72 (Wyo. 2008) (“[A] trial cou | 1 | 4 |
Schmuck v. Stategreen2 sentences2023However, I respectfully dissent from Part II because Mr. Person was prejudiced when the district court misled the jury by giving a general intent instruction for the specific intent crime of stalking. [¶103] I agree with the majority that the district court’s instruction on general intent is a trial error that “must be prejudicial to constitute reversible error.” Schuerman v. State, 2022 WY 160, ¶ 7 , 522 P.3d 145, 148 (Wyo. 2022) (quoting Schmuck v. State, 2017 WY 140, ¶ 45 , 406 P.3d 286, 301 (Wyo. 2017)); Granzer v. State, 2008 WY 118, ¶18 , 193 P.3d 266 , 271–72 (Wyo. 2008) (“[A] trial cou 2023However, I respectfully dissent from Part II because Mr. Person was prejudiced when the district court misled the jury by giving a general intent instruction for the specific intent crime of stalking. [¶103] I agree with the majority that the district court’s instruction on general intent is a trial error that “must be prejudicial to constitute reversible error.” Schuerman v. State, 2022 WY 160, ¶ 7 , 522 P.3d 145, 148 (Wyo. 2022) (quoting Schmuck v. State, 2017 WY 140, ¶ 45 , 406 P.3d 286, 301 (Wyo. 2017)); Granzer v. State, 2008 WY 118, ¶18 , 193 P.3d 266 , 271–72 (Wyo. 2008) (“[A] trial cou | 1 | 1 |
Nathan Jess Michael Schuerman v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2023However, I respectfully dissent from Part II because Mr. Person was prejudiced when the district court misled the jury by giving a general intent instruction for the specific intent crime of stalking. [¶103] I agree with the majority that the district court’s instruction on general intent is a trial error that “must be prejudicial to constitute reversible error.” Schuerman v. State, 2022 WY 160, ¶ 7 , 522 P.3d 145, 148 (Wyo. 2022) (quoting Schmuck v. State, 2017 WY 140, ¶ 45 , 406 P.3d 286, 301 (Wyo. 2017)); Granzer v. State, 2008 WY 118, ¶18 , 193 P.3d 266 , 271–72 (Wyo. 2008) (“[A] trial cou 2023However, I respectfully dissent from Part II because Mr. Person was prejudiced when the district court misled the jury by giving a general intent instruction for the specific intent crime of stalking. [¶103] I agree with the majority that the district court’s instruction on general intent is a trial error that “must be prejudicial to constitute reversible error.” Schuerman v. State, 2022 WY 160, ¶ 7 , 522 P.3d 145, 148 (Wyo. 2022) (quoting Schmuck v. State, 2017 WY 140, ¶ 45 , 406 P.3d 286, 301 (Wyo. 2017)); Granzer v. State, 2008 WY 118, ¶18 , 193 P.3d 266 , 271–72 (Wyo. 2008) (“[A] trial cou | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Large v. State
green
2 sentences2008Id., ¶ 31, 177 P.3d at 816-17 . [¶ 18] Based upon the federal cases and Large , we conclude that a trial court's failure to instruct on an element of a crime is not a structural or fundamental error, but *272 rather a trial error. 2008Id., ¶31, 177 P.3d at 816-17 . [T18] Based upon the federal cases and Large, we conclude that a trial court's failure to instruct on an element of a crime is not a structural or fundamental error, but rather a trial error. | 1 | 2008–2008 |