35 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1976–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Browngreen2 sentences1996An example of where the record supports the presumption that defense counsel explained the elements of the offense to the defendant is where the defendant, “at the time of the plea canvass, acknowledged that defense counsel had explained the essential elements of the crime to him.” Oppel v. Lopes, supra, 200 Conn. 558 ; see also State v. Brown, 19 Conn. App. 640 , 645 n.2, 563 A.2d 1379 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 540 (1989). 1996An example of where the record supports the presumption that defense counsel explained the elements of the offense to the defendant is where the defendant, “at the time of the plea canvass, acknowledged that defense counsel had explained the essential elements of the crime to him.” Oppel v. Lopes, supra, 200 Conn. 558 ; see also State v. Brown, 19 Conn. App. 640 , 645 n.2, 563 A.2d 1379 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 540 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Browngreen2 sentences1996An example of where the record supports the presumption that defense counsel explained the elements of the offense to the defendant is where the defendant, “at the time of the plea canvass, acknowledged that defense counsel had explained the essential elements of the crime to him.” Oppel v. Lopes, supra, 200 Conn. 558 ; see also State v. Brown, 19 Conn. App. 640 , 645 n.2, 563 A.2d 1379 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 540 (1989). 1996An example of where the record supports the presumption that defense counsel explained the elements of the offense to the defendant is where the defendant, “at the time of the plea canvass, acknowledged that defense counsel had explained the essential elements of the crime to him.” Oppel v. Lopes, supra, 200 Conn. 558 ; see also State v. Brown, 19 Conn. App. 640 , 645 n.2, 563 A.2d 1379 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 540 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Czescelgreen2 sentences1988Berchtold v. Maggi, 191 Conn. 266, 274 , 464 A.2d 1 (1983); see also Smith v. Czescel, 12 Conn. App. 558, 563 , 533 A.2d 223 (1987). 1988Berchtold v. Maggi, 191 Conn. 266, 274 , 464 A.2d 1 (1983); see also Smith v. Czescel, 12 Conn. App. 558, 563 , 533 A.2d 223 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Barker v. Wingogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Evans
green
2 sentences1976Our inquiry, therefore, is limited to ascertaining whether the record supports a claim that the defendant was deprived of a “fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 . 1976Our inquiry, therefore, is limited to ascertaining whether the record supports a claim that the defendant was deprived of a "fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial." State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61 , 70 . | 6 | 1976–1993 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences1993State v. Williams, 182 Conn. 262, 267 , 438 A.2d 80 (1980); State v. Evans, [ 165 Conn. 61, 69 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973)]. 1993State v. Williams, 182 Conn. 262, 267 , 438 A.2d 80 (1980); State v. Evans, [ 165 Conn. 61, 69 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973)]. | 4 | 1982–1993 |
In re Romance M.
green
2 sentences1998Our Supreme Court has held that ‘[s]uch exceptional circumstances may occur where a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or where the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ ” In re Michael A., 47 Conn. App. 105, 110 , 703 A.2d 1146 (1997), quoting In re Romance M., 229 Conn. 345, 352-53 , 641 A.2d 378 (1994). 1998Our Supreme Court has held that ‘[s]uch exceptional circumstances may occur where a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or where the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ ” In re Michael A., 47 Conn. App. 105, 110 , 703 A.2d 1146 (1997), quoting In re Romance M., 229 Conn. 345, 352-53 , 641 A.2d 378 (1994). | 3 | 1997–2008 |
Berry v. Loiseau
green
2 sentences1998Generally, “[s]uch exceptional circumstances may occur where a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or where the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Berry v. Loiseau, 223 Conn. 786, 828-29 , 614 A.2d 414 (1992). 1998Generally, “[s]uch exceptional circumstances may occur where a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or where the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Berry v. Loiseau, 223 Conn. 786, 828-29 , 614 A.2d 414 (1992). | 3 | 1994–2006 |
Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation Center
green
2 sentences2024An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Com- mittee v. Egbarin, 61 Conn. App. 445, 452 , 767 A.2d 732 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 949 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001). 2001An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Committee v. Egbarin, 61 Conn. App. 445, 452 , 767 A.2d 732 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 949 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001). | 2 | 2001–2024 |
Kubish v. Zega
green
2 sentences2024An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Com- mittee v. Egbarin, 61 Conn. App. 445, 452 , 767 A.2d 732 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 949 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001). 2001An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Committee v. Egbarin, 61 Conn. App. 445, 452 , 767 A.2d 732 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 949 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001). | 2 | 2001–2024 |
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Egbarin
green
2 sentences2024An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Com- mittee v. Egbarin, 61 Conn. App. 445, 452 , 767 A.2d 732 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 949 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001). 2024An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Com- mittee v. Egbarin, 61 Conn. App. 445, 452 , 767 A.2d 732 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 949 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001). | 2 | 2001–2024 |
Perez-Dickson v. City of Bridgeport
green
2 sentences2022This rule applies equally to alterna- t[ive] grounds for affirmance.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Perez-Dickson v. Bridgeport, 304 Conn. 483 , 498–99, 43 A.3d 69 (2012). ‘‘Such exceptional circumstances may occur [when] a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or [when] the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial. . . . 2022This rule applies equally to alterna- t[ive] grounds for affirmance.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Perez-Dickson v. Bridgeport, 304 Conn. 483 , 498–99, 43 A.3d 69 (2012). ‘‘Such exceptional circumstances may occur [when] a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or [when] the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial. . . . | 2 | 2014–2022 |
Dubois v. General Dynamics Corp.
green
2 sentences2001An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Committee v. Friedland, 222 Conn. 131, 147 , 609 A.2d 645 (1992), quoting Dubois v. General Dynamics Corp., 222 Conn. 62, 68-69 , 607 A.2d 431 (1992). 2001An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Committee v. Friedland, 222 Conn. 131, 147 , 609 A.2d 645 (1992), quoting Dubois v. General Dynamics Corp., 222 Conn. 62, 68-69 , 607 A.2d 431 (1992). | 2 | 1992–2001 |
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences1990State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989); State v. Horne, 19 Conn. App. 111, 136 , 562 A.2d 43 (1989). 1990State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989); State v. Horne, 19 Conn. App. 111, 136 , 562 A.2d 43 (1989). | 2 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Spigarolo
green
2 sentences1989State v. Spigarolo, 210 Conn. 359, 388-89 , 556 A.2d 112 (1989), citing State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322 , 329-30 n.4, 551 A.2d 1206 (1988) (question whether record supports constitutional claim is whether claim is truly of constitutional proportions or is simply characterized as such by defendant). 1989State v. Spigarolo, 210 Conn. 359, 388-89 , 556 A.2d 112 (1989), citing State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322 , 329-30 n.4, 551 A.2d 1206 (1988) (question whether record supports constitutional claim is whether claim is truly of constitutional proportions or is simply characterized as such by defendant). | 2 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Simms
green
2 sentences1980State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206, 208 , 365 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S. Ct. 1732 , 48 L. 1980State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206, 208 , 365 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S. Ct. 1732 , 48 L. | 2 | 1980–1980 |
Berry v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1980State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206, 208 , 365 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S. Ct. 1732 , 48 L. 1980State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206 , 208 , 365 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S.Ct. 1732 , 48 L.Ed.2d 199 (1976); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61 , 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973). | 2 | 1980–1980 |
De la Cruz v. Estelle
green
2 sentences1980State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206, 208 , 365 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S. Ct. 1732 , 48 L. 1980State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206 , 208 , 365 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S.Ct. 1732 , 48 L.Ed.2d 199 (1976); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61 , 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973). | 2 | 1980–1980 |
Hanna v. Stone
green
2 sentences2012Nothing in the record supports the claim that the defendants did something or failed to do something that helped to bring about the injury in question.” (Citations omitted.) Id., 389-90 . 2012The court emphasized that “there was no evidence from which a reasonable jury might conclude that they knew or should have known that there was a necessity and opportunity for exercising . . . control” over the boy who threw the punch on their property; id., 391 ; and further reasoned that “even if [the] defendants had known that the two boys had had a fight in the school yard approximately five months prior to the party, that information without more would not have made foreseeable the single punch thrown at their son’s birthday party.” Id., 390 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Skrzypiec v. Noonan
green
2 sentences2004An exception may also be made [when] consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Skrzypiec v. Noonan, 228 Conn. 1, 14-15 , 633 A.2d 716 (1993). 2004An exception may also be made [when] consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Skrzypiec v. Noonan, 228 Conn. 1, 14-15 , 633 A.2d 716 (1993). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Diane Leibovitz v. New York City Transit Authority, Joseph Hoffman and Monroe Easter
green
1 sentence2003Leibovitz v. New York City Transit Authority , 252 F.3d 179 (2d Cir. 2001). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. State
green
1 sentence2002In exceptional circumstances, however, an appellate court may review a claim not raised at trial. “[S]uch exceptional circumstances may occur where a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or where the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 321 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Friedland
green
2 sentences2001An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Committee v. Friedland, 222 Conn. 131, 147 , 609 A.2d 645 (1992), quoting Dubois v. General Dynamics Corp., 222 Conn. 62, 68-69 , 607 A.2d 431 (1992). 2001An exception may also be made where consideration of the question is in the interest of public welfare or of justice between the parties.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Statewide Grievance Committee v. Friedland, 222 Conn. 131, 147 , 609 A.2d 645 (1992), quoting Dubois v. General Dynamics Corp., 222 Conn. 62, 68-69 , 607 A.2d 431 (1992). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In re Michael A.
green
2 sentences1998Our Supreme Court has held that ‘[s]uch exceptional circumstances may occur where a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or where the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ ” In re Michael A., 47 Conn. App. 105, 110 , 703 A.2d 1146 (1997), quoting In re Romance M., 229 Conn. 345, 352-53 , 641 A.2d 378 (1994). 1998Our Supreme Court has held that ‘[s]uch exceptional circumstances may occur where a new and unforeseen constitutional right has arisen between the time of trial and appeal or where the record supports a claim that a litigant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ ” In re Michael A., 47 Conn. App. 105, 110 , 703 A.2d 1146 (1997), quoting In re Romance M., 229 Conn. 345, 352-53 , 641 A.2d 378 (1994). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Horne
green
2 sentences1990State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989); State v. Horne, 19 Conn. App. 111, 136 , 562 A.2d 43 (1989). 1990State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989); State v. Horne, 19 Conn. App. 111, 136 , 562 A.2d 43 (1989). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Bailey
green
2 sentences1989State v. Spigarolo, 210 Conn. 359, 388-89 , 556 A.2d 112 (1989), citing State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322 , 329-30 n.4, 551 A.2d 1206 (1988) (question whether record supports constitutional claim is whether claim is truly of constitutional proportions or is simply characterized as such by defendant). 1989State v. Spigarolo, 210 Conn. 359, 388-89 , 556 A.2d 112 (1989), citing State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322 , 329-30 n.4, 551 A.2d 1206 (1988) (question whether record supports constitutional claim is whether claim is truly of constitutional proportions or is simply characterized as such by defendant). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Jungen v. Oregon
green
1 sentence1989State v. Spigarolo, 210 Conn. 359, 388-89 , 556 A.2d 112 , cert. denied, U.S. , 110 S. Ct. 322 , 107 L. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Franko
green
2 sentences1988State v. Franko, 199 Conn. 481, 490 , 508 A.2d 22 (1986). 1988State v. Franko, 199 Conn. 481, 490 , 508 A.2d 22 (1986). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Cahill v. Board of Education
green
2 sentences1988The plain error doctrine is reserved for the most exceptional circumstances in which the record supports a claim that the party has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial; Cahill v. Board of Education, 187 Conn. 94, 100 , 444 A.2d 907 (1982); or where the error in some way directly affects the outcome of the case. 1988The plain error doctrine is reserved for the most exceptional circumstances in which the record supports a claim that the party has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial; Cahill v. Board of Education, 187 Conn. 94, 100 , 444 A.2d 907 (1982); or where the error in some way directly affects the outcome of the case. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Berchtold v. Maggi
green
2 sentences1988Berchtold v. Maggi, 191 Conn. 266, 274 , 464 A.2d 1 (1983); see also Smith v. Czescel, 12 Conn. App. 558, 563 , 533 A.2d 223 (1987). 1988Berchtold v. Maggi, 191 Conn. 266, 274 , 464 A.2d 1 (1983); see also Smith v. Czescel, 12 Conn. App. 558, 563 , 533 A.2d 223 (1987). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Van Steensburg v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospitals green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. West
green
1 sentence1987State v. Benite, 6 Conn. App. 667, 671 , 507 A.2d 478 (1986); State v. West, 3 Conn. App. 650, 654 , 491 A.2d 428 , cert. denied, 196 Conn. 810 , 497 A.2d 906 (1985). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. West green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Benite green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Rice green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.