Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Leegreen1 sentence2025See State v. Lee, 189 Ariz. 608, 616 (1997) (“Trial judges ‘are presumed to know the law and to apply it in making their decisions.’”) (citation omitted). ¶23 Finally, Goldwater cites no case law or other applicable public records authority showing a finding of potential material harm rather than probable material harm constitutes reversible error. | 1 | 1 |
Valladee v. Valladeegreen2 sentences2023Id. (citation omitted). 2023Thus, this record supports a presumption of a gift from Wife to Husband of the separate funds used to purchase the Havasu Home. ¶16 To overcome a presumption of gift, the contributing spouse must present “clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.” Valladee v. Valladee, 149 Ariz. 304, 307 (App. 1986). “[T]estimony of the hidden intentions of one of the parties” is insufficient to rebut the presumption. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence2016Second, Coleman asserts he was not read Miranda rights “preceding detention.” However, police officers are only required to give Miranda warnings prior to “custodial interrogation,” State v. Smith, 193 Ariz. 452, 457, ¶ 18 (1999), and Coleman’s recorded interview establishes that Sergeant Uptain read Miranda rights to Coleman prior to questioning. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cruz-Matagreen2 sentences1987State v. Cruz-Mata, 138 Ariz. 370, 373-74 , 674 P.2d 1368, 1371-72 (1983). 1987State v. Cruz-Mata, 138 Ariz. 370, 373-74 , 674 P.2d 1368, 1371-72 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rawlings v. Apodaca
green
1 sentence2022Instead, “[t]o be liable for tort damages, it need only to have intended its act or omission, lacking a founded belief that such conduct was permitted by the policy.” Id. 7 ¶20 We start with an evaluation of whether the record supports a waiver jury instruction in the trial of Cavallo’s insurance bad faith claim. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Berenter v. Gallinger
green
2 sentences1995Berenter v. Gallinger, 173 Ariz. 75 , 839 P.2d 1120 (App.1992). 1995Berenter v. Gallinger, 173 Ariz. 75 , 839 P.2d 1120 (App.1992). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. LaGrand
green
2 sentences1995“An intoxication instruction should be given only when the record supports such an instruction.” LaGrand, 152 Ariz. at 487 , 733 P.2d at 1070 . 1995“An intoxication instruction should be given only when the record supports such an instruction.” LaGrand, 152 Ariz. at 487 , 733 P.2d at 1070 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Raban v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1980As we stated in Raban v. Industrial Commission, supra: When an injured person returns to essentially the same type of work he was doing prior to the injury, has steady employment, and earns at least as much money for his labors, he cannot be heard to complain that his earning capacity has been diminished. 25 Ariz.App. at 161 , 541 P.2d at 952 . 1980As we stated in Raban v. Industrial Commission, supra: When an injured person returns to essentially the same type of work he was doing prior to the injury, has steady employment, and earns at least as much money for his labors, he cannot be heard to complain that his earning capacity has been diminished. 25 Ariz.App. at 161 , 541 P.2d at 952 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.