burden of showing reversible error in Indiana

33 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
Marion-Adams School Corp. v. Boonegreen indctapp · 2006 · cited in 17 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2019 2 sentences 2019Corp. v. Boone, 840 N.E.2d 462 , 468 Court of Appeals of Indiana \| Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-3021 \| May 30, 2019 Page 12 of 20 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) (“It is a cardinal rule of appellate review that the appellant bears the burden of showing reversible error by the record, as all presumptions are in favor of the trial court’s judgment.”). [21] Father has not shown that the evidence presented at—or the outcome of—the termination proceeding would have been any different if it had taken place within the statutory deadline; that is, he has shown no harm that he suffered from the untimely commencemen 2015“It is a cardinal rule of appellate review that the appellant bears the burden of showing reversible error by the record, as all presumptions are in 3 favor the trial court’s judgment.” Marion-Adams School Corp. v. Boone, 840 N.E.2d 462, 468 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006).	16	17
Smith v. Convenience Store Distributing Co.green ind · 1992 · cited in 3 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2014 2 sentences 2014“The party claiming the error has the burden to establish a complete and accurate record.” Smith v. Convenience Store Distributing Co., 583 N.E.2d 735, 739 (Ind. 1992). 2014“The party claiming the error has the burden to establish a complete and accurate record.” Smith v. Convenience Store Distributing Co., 583 N.E.2d 735, 739 (Ind. 1992).	3	3
Martin v. Martingreen indctapp · 2002 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2006–2008 2 sentences 2008Corp. v. Boone, 840 N.E.2d 462, 468 (Ind.Ct.App.2006) (citing Martin v. Martin, 771 N.E.2d 650, 655 (Ind. Ct.App.2002)). 4 . 2006Martin v. Martin, 771 N.E.2d 650, 655 (Ind.Ct.App. *469 2002).	2	2
Mead v. Saltergreen indctapp · 1991 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005"On appeal, the burden of showing reversible error is on appellant; all reasonable presumptions are indulged in favor of the rulings and judgment of the trial court." Mead v. Salter, 566 N.E.2d 577, 583 (Ind.Ct.App.1991). 2005"On appeal, the burden of showing reversible error is on appellant; all reasonable presumptions are indulged in favor of the rulings and judgment of the trial court." Mead v. Salter, 566 N.E.2d 577, 588 (Ind.Ct.App.1991).	2	2
Trinity Homes, LLC v. Fanggreen ind · 2006 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015Trinity Homes, LLC v. Fang, 848 N.E.2d 1065, 1067-68 (Ind. 2006). [4] “It is a cardinal rule of appellate review that the appellant bears the burden of showing reversible error by the record, as all presumptions are in favor of the trial court’s judgment.” Marion-Adams Sch.	1	1
In Re KHgreen indctapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015See In re K.H., 838 N.E.2d 477 , 480 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (noting that, on appeal, the burden of showing reversible error is on appellant).	1	1
City of Fort Wayne v. Bishopgreen ind · 1950 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002It is also a cardinal rule of appellate review, however, that appellants have the burden of showing reversible error by the record, "as all presumptions are in favor of the judgments and rulings of the trial court." City of Fort Wayne v. Bishop, 228 Ind. 304, 815 , 92 N.E.2d 544, 548 (1950). 2002It is also a cardinal rule of appellate review, however, that appellants have the burden of showing reversible error by the record, "as all presumptions are in favor of the judgments and rulings of the trial court." City of Fort Wayne v. Bishop, 228 Ind. 304, 815 , 92 N.E.2d 544, 548 (1950).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

Case	Cited	Years
Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'n green ind · 1983 2 sentences 1991Raymundo v. Hommond Clinic Association (1988), Ind., 449 N.E.2d 276, 280 . 1991Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Association (1983), Ind., 449 N.E.2d 276, 280 .	4	1987–1991
Gibson v. Bojrab green indctapp · 2011 2 sentences 2014Id. at 352 . 2014Id. at 352 .	2	2014–2014
Indiana State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors Ex Rel. Little v. Kaufman green indctapp · 1984 2 sentences 2013“An appellant has the burden of showing reversible error.” Id. 2013“An appellant has the burden of showing reversible error.” Id.	2	2013–2013
State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Oliverius green indctapp · 1973 2 sentences 1984State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Oliverius, (1973) 156 Ind.App. 46 , 294 N.E.2d 646 . 1984State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Oliverius, (1973) 156 Ind.App. 46 , 294 N.E.2d 646 .	2	1983–1984
Collins v. Thakkar green indctapp · 1990 1 sentence 1991Collins v. Thakkar (1990), Ind.App., 552 N.E.2d 507 .	1	1991–1991

Where else courts name it

CA 179 (1933–2026) IN 33 (1983–2019) MT 10 (1911–1953) TX 6 (2021–2024) AL 6 (1984–1995) FL 4 (1948–1969) MD 3 (2005–2010) CO 2 (1988–1992) MS 2 (2014–2023) ID 2 (1990–1995) VA 2 (2007–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check