burden of showing reversible error (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

burden of showing reversible error in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2021–2024 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Grimm v. Grimmgreen
texapp · 1993 · cited in 6 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2021–2024
2 sentences

2024Ford Motor Co. v. Castillo, 279 S.W.3d 656, 667 (Tex. 2009) (complaining party bears burden of showing harmful error on appeal to obtain reversal); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 21 Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The burden of showing reversible error is on appellant as the complaining party.”); see Tex. R.

2024See Ford Motor Co. v. Castillo, 279 S.W.3d 656, 667 (Tex. 2009) (complaining party bears burden of showing harmful error on appeal to obtain reversal); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The burden of showing reversible error is on appellant as the complaining party.”); see also Tex. R.

66
Ford Motor Co. v. Castillogreen
tex · 2009 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024Ford Motor Co. v. Castillo, 279 S.W.3d 656, 667 (Tex. 2009) (complaining party bears burden of showing harmful error on appeal to obtain reversal); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 21 Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The burden of showing reversible error is on appellant as the complaining party.”); see Tex. R.

2024See Ford Motor Co. v. Castillo, 279 S.W.3d 656, 667 (Tex. 2009) (complaining party bears burden of showing harmful error on appeal to obtain reversal); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The burden of showing reversible error is on appellant as the complaining party.”); see also Tex. R.

22
San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawfordgreen
texapp · 2005 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023See id.; San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford, 171 S.W.3d 323, 338 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (holding that “parties asserting error on appeal still must put forth some specific argument and analysis showing that the record and the law supports their contentions”); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The burden of showing reversible error is on appellant as the complaining party.”); see also Canton-Carter v. Baylor College of Med., 271 S.W.3d 928, 931 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (“Failure to cite legal author

2023The same is true of MH Franchising’s complaint of improper arguments and comments by Hagman’s counsel, in addition to MH Franchising’s failure to cite the record in support of its contention that Hagman’s counsel improperly used the word “rape.” See id.; see also San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford, 171 S.W.3d 323, 338 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (holding that “parties asserting error on appeal still must put forth some 17 specific argument and analysis showing that the record and the law supports their contentions”); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14t

22
Canton-Carter v. Baylor College of Medicinegreen
texapp · 2008 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023App. P. 38.1(i) (“The brief must contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.”); Canton-Carter v. Baylor College of Med., 271 S.W.3d 928, 931 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (“Failure to cite legal authority or to provide substantive analysis of the legal issues presented results in waiver of the complaint.”); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The burden of showing reversible error is on appellant as the complaining party.”).

2023See id.; San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford, 171 S.W.3d 323, 338 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (holding that “parties asserting error on appeal still must put forth some specific argument and analysis showing that the record and the law supports their contentions”); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The burden of showing reversible error is on appellant as the complaining party.”); see also Canton-Carter v. Baylor College of Med., 271 S.W.3d 928, 931 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (“Failure to cite legal author

22
Barham v. Turner Construction Co. of Texasgreen
texapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023The same is true of MH Franchising’s complaint of improper arguments and comments by Hagman’s counsel, in addition to MH Franchising’s failure to cite the record in support of its contention that Hagman’s counsel improperly used the word “rape.” See id.; see also San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford, 171 S.W.3d 323, 338 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (holding that “parties asserting error on appeal still must put forth some 17 specific argument and analysis showing that the record and the law supports their contentions”); Grimm v. Grimm, 864 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Tex. App.—Houston [14t

11
John David Adams v. Starside Custom Builders, Llcgreen
tex · 2018 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
1 sentence

2021Moreover, the supreme court has instructed courts to take a broad view of error preservation in TCPA cases due to the statute’s “unique language.” Adams v. Starside Custom Builders, LLC, 547 S.W.3d 890, 897 (Tex. 2018).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

CA 179 (1933–2026) IN 33 (1983–2019) MT 10 (1911–1953) TX 6 (2021–2024) AL 6 (1984–1995) FL 4 (1948–1969) MD 3 (2005–2010) CO 2 (1988–1992) MS 2 (2014–2023) ID 2 (1990–1995) VA 2 (2007–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check