Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
33 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nevada Power Co. v. Haggertygreen2 sentences2018Power Co. v. Haggerty, 115 Nev. 353 , 364, 989 P.2d 870 , 877 (1999) ) ). 2018Power Co. v. Haggerty, 115 Nev. 353 , 364, 989 P.2d 870 , 877 (1999) ) ). | 8 | 10 |
Albios v. Horizon Communities, Inc.green2 sentences2019Cf. Albios v. Horizon Cmtys., Inc., 122 Nev. 409, 418 , 132 P.3d 1022, 1028 (2006) (Whenever possible, this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules and statutes." (internal quotation marks omitted)). 2019Cf. Albios v. Horizon Cmtys., Inc., 122 Nev. 409, 418 , 132 P.3d 1022, 1028 (2006) (Whenever possible, this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules and statutes." (internal quotation marks omitted)). | 7 | 7 |
Allianz Insurance v. Gagnongreen2 sentences2020Co. v. Gagnon, 109 Nev. 990, 993, 860 P.2d 720, 723 (1993) ("Whenever possible, this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules and statutes."). 2020Co. v. Gagnon, 109 Nev. 990, 993, 860 P.2d 720, 723 (1993) ("Whenever possible, this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules and statutes."). | 6 | 6 |
Bowyer v. Taackgreen2 sentences2015Power Co. v. Haggerty, 115 Nev. 353, 364 , 989 P.2d 870, 877 (1999); see also Bowyer, 107 Nev. at 627-28 , 817 P.2d at 1178 . 2015Power Co. v. Haggerty, 115 Nev. 353, 364 , 989 P.2d 870, 877 (1999); see also Bowyer, 107 Nev. at 627-28 , 817 P.2d at 1178 . | 6 | 6 |
City Council of Reno v. Reno Newspapers, Inc.green2 sentences2000Bowyer v. Taack, 107 Nev. 625, 627 , 817 P.2d 1176, 1177 (1991); City Council of Reno v. Reno Newspapers, 105 Nev. 886, 892 , 784 P.2d 974, 978 (1989). 2000Bowyer v. Taack, 107 Nev. 625, 627 , 817 P.2d 1176, 1177 (1991); City Council of Reno v. Reno Newspapers, 105 Nev. 886, 892 , 784 P.2d 974, 978 (1989). | 3 | 3 |
State v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurancegreen2 sentences2023Co., 116 Nev. 290, 295, 995 P.2d 482, 486 (2000) ("Whenever possible, this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules or statutes."). 2023Co., 116 Nev. 290, 295, 995 P.2d 482, 486 (2000) (“Whenever possible, this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules or statutes.”). | 2 | 2 |
Clay v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clarkgreen2 sentences2025But that does not end the inquiry because "this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules and statutes." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). 2025But that does not end the inquiry because “this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules and statutes.” Id. | 1 | 2 |
Nevada Attorney for Injured Workers v. Nevada Self-Insurers Ass'ngreen2 sentences2016Attorney for Injured Workers, 126 Nev. at 86, 225 P.3d at 1272. 2016Attorney for Injured Workers, 126 Nev. at 86, 225 P.3d at 1272. | 1 | 2 |
Davis v. Belinggreen2 sentences2025The court reads a statute as a whole, Davis v. Beling, 128 Nev. 301, 311 , 278 P.3d 501, 508 (2012), and "whenever possible, a court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules or statutes," Watson Rounds, P.C. v. Eighth Jud. 2025The court reads a statute as a whole, Davis v. Beling, 128 Nev. 301, 311 , 278 P.3d 501, 508 (2012), and "whenever possible, a court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules or statutes," Watson Rounds, P.C. v. Eighth Jud. | 1 | 1 |
CUMMINGS VS. BARBER, M.D.green2 sentences2023NRS 41A.100(1) sets forth five factual circumstances where a rebuttable presumption of professional negligence exists such that a plaintiff need not present expert testimony at trial, See, e.g., Cummings v. Barber, 136 Nev. 139, 144-45, 460 P.3d 963, 968 (2020) (concluding that an injured patient was not required to present expert testimony to withstand surnmary judgment where she COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 28 (I I p 19471i presented evidence giving rise to a presumption of negligence under NRS 41A.100(1)). 2023NRS 41A.100(1) sets forth five factual circumstances where a rebuttable presumption of professional negligence exists such that a plaintiff need not present expert testimony at trial, See, e.g., Cummings v. Barber, 136 Nev. 139, 144-45, 460 P.3d 963, 968 (2020) (concluding that an injured patient was not required to present expert testimony to withstand surnmary judgment where she COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 28 (I I p 19471i presented evidence giving rise to a presumption of negligence under NRS 41A.100(1)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
George J. v. State
green
2 sentences2013"Likewise, this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules and statutes." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). 2013“Likewise, this court will interpret a rule or statute in harmony with other rules and statutes.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.