Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
31 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Filergreen2 sentences2004While the Louisiana Supreme Court has expressed its preference for personal colloquies between a trial court and a defendant entering a guilty plea on the basis that the failure to individually address the defendant may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights, the Supreme Court has consistently stated that the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case." State v. Richard, 00-0659 (La.9/29/00), 769 So.2d 1177 , 1178 State v. Filer, 00-0073 (La.6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1080, 1081 . 2001Additionally, the Louisiana Supreme Court has expressed its preference for personal colloquies between a trial court and a defendant entering a guilty plea and has recognized that, while the failure of a trial court to address the defendant individually as well as personally may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights, the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case." State v. Filer, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1080, 1081 (per curiam) (citing State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540 , 544 n. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Straingreen2 sentences2001Additionally, the Louisiana Supreme Court has expressed its preference for personal colloquies between a trial court and a defendant entering a guilty plea and has recognized that, while the failure of a trial court to address the defendant individually as well as personally may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights, the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case." State v. Filer, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1080, 1081 (per curiam) (citing State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540 , 544 n. 2000C.Cr.P. art. 556.1(A) incorporates this Court's preference for personal colloquies between a trial judge and a defendant entering a guilty plea, see State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779, 781 (La.1980) ("The only realistic means of assuring that the trial judge leaves a record adequate for any later review is to require that the record contain on its face direct evidence that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.") (citations omitted), and while the failure of a trial judge | 1 | 2 |
State v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2000C.Cr.P. art. 556.1(A) incorporates this Court's preference for personal colloquies between a trial judge and a defendant entering a guilty plea, see State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779, 781 (La.1980) ("The only realistic means of assuring that the trial judge leaves a record adequate for any later review is to require that the record contain on its face direct evidence that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.") (citations omitted), and while the failure of a trial judge | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Michigan v. Mosley
green
2 sentences2026“When a defendant exercises his privilege against self- incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have ‘scrupulously honored’ his right to remain silent.” Taylor, 2001-1638 p. 6, 838 So.2d at 739 , citing Mosley, 423 U.S. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 326 . 2026“When a defendant exercises his privilege against self- incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have ‘scrupulously honored’ his right to remain silent.” Taylor, 2001-1638 p. 6, 838 So.2d at 739 , citing Mosley, 423 U.S. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 326 . | 23 | 1980–2026 |
State v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2026“When a defendant exercises his privilege against self- incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have ‘scrupulously honored’ his right to remain silent.” Taylor, 2001-1638 p. 6, 838 So.2d at 739 , citing Mosley, 423 U.S. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 326 . 2017Because I’m not about to let y’all sit up here and use that, talking about...” He relies on State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 6 (La. 1/14/03), 838 So.2d 729, 739 , wherein the Court recognized that “[wjhen a defendant exercises his privilege against self-incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have “scrupulously honored” his right to remain silent.” (citing Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 102 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975). | 5 | 2006–2026 |
State v. Manning
green
2 sentences1982If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.' Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ State v. Manning, 380 So.2d 46 (La.1980), and State v. Dominick, 354 So.2d 1316 (La.1978)] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1 1982If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.' Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ State v. Manning, 380 So.2d 46 (La.1980), and State v. Dominick, 354 So.2d 1316 (La.1978)] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1 | 3 | 1980–1982 |
State v. Dominick
green
2 sentences1982If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.' Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ State v. Manning, 380 So.2d 46 (La.1980), and State v. Dominick, 354 So.2d 1316 (La.1978)] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1 1981Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted [ State v. Manning, 380 So.2d 46 (La., 1980), and State v. Dominick, 354 So.2d 1316 (La., 1978)], once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police. | 3 | 1980–1982 |
State v. Brooks
green
2 sentences1996Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). 1991Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). | 2 | 1991–1996 |
McCulloch v. United States
green
2 sentences1996Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). 1991Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). | 2 | 1991–1996 |
Brooks v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1996Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). 1991Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). | 2 | 1991–1996 |
Shadian v. North Orange County Municipal Court
green
2 sentences1996Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). 1991Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). | 2 | 1991–1996 |
Henry v. Page
green
1 sentence2022However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police -initiated custodial interrogation or 13 questioning " reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." See State v. Tilley, 99- 0569 ( La. 716100), 767 So. 2d 6, 11 , cert. denied, 532 U. S. 959 , 121 S. Ct. 1488 , 149 L.Ed. 2d 375 ( 2001). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Hu v. Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities
green
2 sentences2022However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police -initiated custodial interrogation or 13 questioning " reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." See State v. Tilley, 99- 0569 ( La. 716100), 767 So. 2d 6, 11 , cert. denied, 532 U. S. 959 , 121 S. Ct. 1488 , 149 L.Ed. 2d 375 ( 2001). 2022However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police -initiated custodial interrogation or 13 questioning " reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." See State v. Tilley, 99- 0569 ( La. 716100), 767 So. 2d 6, 11 , cert. denied, 532 U. S. 959 , 121 S. Ct. 1488 , 149 L.Ed. 2d 375 ( 2001). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Tilley
green
1 sentence2022However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police -initiated custodial interrogation or 13 questioning " reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." See State v. Tilley, 99- 0569 ( La. 716100), 767 So. 2d 6, 11 , cert. denied, 532 U. S. 959 , 121 S. Ct. 1488 , 149 L.Ed. 2d 375 ( 2001). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Richard
green
1 sentence2004While the Louisiana Supreme Court has expressed its preference for personal colloquies between a trial court and a defendant entering a guilty plea on the basis that the failure to individually address the defendant may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights, the Supreme Court has consistently stated that the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case." State v. Richard, 00-0659 (La.9/29/00), 769 So.2d 1177 , 1178 State v. Filer, 00-0073 (La.6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1080, 1081 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Tolbert
neutral
1 sentence2001In State v. Tolbert, 30,821 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/98), 716 So.2d 949 , writ denied, 98-2562 (La.1/15/99), 736 So.2d 207 , this court held: When a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Jordan
neutral
1 sentence2001In State v. Tolbert, 30,821 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/98), 716 So.2d 949 , writ denied, 98-2562 (La.1/15/99), 736 So.2d 207 , this court held: When a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
City of Monroe v. Wyrick
green
1 sentence2000C.Cr.P. art. 556.1(A) incorporates this Court's preference for personal colloquies between a trial judge and a defendant entering a guilty plea, see State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779, 781 (La.1980) ("The only realistic means of assuring that the trial judge leaves a record adequate for any later review is to require that the record contain on its face direct evidence that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.") (citations omitted), and while the failure of a trial judge | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Baker
green
1 sentence1996App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992), cert. den. 506 U.S. 818 , 113 S.Ct. 62 , 121 L.Ed.2d 30 (1992): Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Manatt v. Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners
green
1 sentence1996App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992), cert. den. 506 U.S. 818 , 113 S.Ct. 62 , 121 L.Ed.2d 30 (1992): Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Kuhn v. Kuhn
green
1 sentence1996App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992), cert. den. 506 U.S. 818 , 113 S.Ct. 62 , 121 L.Ed.2d 30 (1992): Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Edward D. Jones & Co. v. Carter
green
1 sentence1996App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992), cert. den. 506 U.S. 818 , 113 S.Ct. 62 , 121 L.Ed.2d 30 (1992): Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
1 sentence1991Therefore, the state was required only to show that defendant had been advised of his constitutional rights and waived the same before making his statements." Id., 499 So.2d at pps. 304 and 305. (emphasis added) Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the *1329 "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. McCarty
green
1 sentence1984State v. McCarty, 421 So.2d 213 (La.1982). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Mouton
green
1 sentence1982State v. Mouton, 366 So.2d 1336 (La.1978); State v. Peevy, 321 So.2d 324 (La.1975). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Shea
green
1 sentence1982State v. Kevin Michael Shea, 421 So.2d 200 (La.1982) (on rehearing). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Peevy
green
1 sentence1982State v. Mouton, 366 So.2d 1336 (La.1978); State v. Peevy, 321 So.2d 324 (La.1975). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Thucos
green
1 sentence1981Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Thucos, 390 So.2d 1281 (La., 1980); State v. Manning, supra. The State's burden here is a *671 heavy one. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.