validity of any subsequent waiver (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

validity of any subsequent waiver in Louisiana

31 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Filergreen
la · 2000 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2001–2004
2 sentences

2004While the Louisiana Supreme Court has expressed its preference for personal colloquies between a trial court and a defendant entering a guilty plea on the basis that the failure to individually address the defendant may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights, the Supreme Court has consistently stated that the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case." State v. Richard, 00-0659 (La.9/29/00), 769 So.2d 1177 , 1178 State v. Filer, 00-0073 (La.6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1080, 1081 .

2001Additionally, the Louisiana Supreme Court has expressed its preference for personal colloquies between a trial court and a defendant entering a guilty plea and has recognized that, while the failure of a trial court to address the defendant individually as well as personally may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights, the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case." State v. Filer, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1080, 1081 (per curiam) (citing State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540 , 544 n.

12
State v. Straingreen
la · 1991 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2001
2 sentences

2001Additionally, the Louisiana Supreme Court has expressed its preference for personal colloquies between a trial court and a defendant entering a guilty plea and has recognized that, while the failure of a trial court to address the defendant individually as well as personally may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights, the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case." State v. Filer, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1080, 1081 (per curiam) (citing State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540 , 544 n.

2000C.Cr.P. art. 556.1(A) incorporates this Court's preference for personal colloquies between a trial judge and a defendant entering a guilty plea, see State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779, 781 (La.1980) ("The only realistic means of assuring that the trial judge leaves a record adequate for any later review is to require that the record contain on its face direct evidence that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.") (citations omitted), and while the failure of a trial judge

12
State v. Williamsgreen
la · 1980 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000C.Cr.P. art. 556.1(A) incorporates this Court's preference for personal colloquies between a trial judge and a defendant entering a guilty plea, see State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779, 781 (La.1980) ("The only realistic means of assuring that the trial judge leaves a record adequate for any later review is to require that the record contain on its face direct evidence that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.") (citations omitted), and while the failure of a trial judge

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (25)

CaseCitedYears
Michigan v. Mosley green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

2026“When a defendant exercises his privilege against self- incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have ‘scrupulously honored’ his right to remain silent.” Taylor, 2001-1638 p. 6, 838 So.2d at 739 , citing Mosley, 423 U.S. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 326 .

2026“When a defendant exercises his privilege against self- incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have ‘scrupulously honored’ his right to remain silent.” Taylor, 2001-1638 p. 6, 838 So.2d at 739 , citing Mosley, 423 U.S. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 326 .

231980–2026
State v. Taylor green
la · 2003
2 sentences

2026“When a defendant exercises his privilege against self- incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have ‘scrupulously honored’ his right to remain silent.” Taylor, 2001-1638 p. 6, 838 So.2d at 739 , citing Mosley, 423 U.S. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 326 .

2017Because I’m not about to let y’all sit up here and use that, talking about...” He relies on State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 6 (La. 1/14/03), 838 So.2d 729, 739 , wherein the Court recognized that “[wjhen a defendant exercises his privilege against self-incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have “scrupulously honored” his right to remain silent.” (citing Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 102 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975).

52006–2026
State v. Manning green
la · 1980
2 sentences

1982If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.' Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ State v. Manning, 380 So.2d 46 (La.1980), and State v. Dominick, 354 So.2d 1316 (La.1978)] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1

1982If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.' Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ State v. Manning, 380 So.2d 46 (La.1980), and State v. Dominick, 354 So.2d 1316 (La.1978)] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1

31980–1982
State v. Dominick green
la · 1978
2 sentences

1982If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.' Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ State v. Manning, 380 So.2d 46 (La.1980), and State v. Dominick, 354 So.2d 1316 (La.1978)] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1

1981Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted [ State v. Manning, 380 So.2d 46 (La., 1980), and State v. Dominick, 354 So.2d 1316 (La., 1978)], once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.

31980–1982
State v. Brooks green
la · 1987
2 sentences

1996Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).

1991Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).

21991–1996
McCulloch v. United States green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

1996Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).

1991Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).

21991–1996
Brooks v. Louisiana green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

1996Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).

1991Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).

21991–1996
Shadian v. North Orange County Municipal Court green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

1996Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).

1991Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).

21991–1996
Henry v. Page green
scotus · 2001
1 sentence

2022However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police -initiated custodial interrogation or 13 questioning " reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." See State v. Tilley, 99- 0569 ( La. 716100), 767 So. 2d 6, 11 , cert. denied, 532 U. S. 959 , 121 S. Ct. 1488 , 149 L.Ed. 2d 375 ( 2001).

12022–2022
Hu v. Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities green
scotus · 2001
2 sentences

2022However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police -initiated custodial interrogation or 13 questioning " reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." See State v. Tilley, 99- 0569 ( La. 716100), 767 So. 2d 6, 11 , cert. denied, 532 U. S. 959 , 121 S. Ct. 1488 , 149 L.Ed. 2d 375 ( 2001).

2022However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police -initiated custodial interrogation or 13 questioning " reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." See State v. Tilley, 99- 0569 ( La. 716100), 767 So. 2d 6, 11 , cert. denied, 532 U. S. 959 , 121 S. Ct. 1488 , 149 L.Ed. 2d 375 ( 2001).

12022–2022
State v. Tilley green
la · 2000
1 sentence

2022However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police -initiated custodial interrogation or 13 questioning " reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." See State v. Tilley, 99- 0569 ( La. 716100), 767 So. 2d 6, 11 , cert. denied, 532 U. S. 959 , 121 S. Ct. 1488 , 149 L.Ed. 2d 375 ( 2001).

12022–2022
State v. Richard green
la · 2000
1 sentence

2004While the Louisiana Supreme Court has expressed its preference for personal colloquies between a trial court and a defendant entering a guilty plea on the basis that the failure to individually address the defendant may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights, the Supreme Court has consistently stated that the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case." State v. Richard, 00-0659 (La.9/29/00), 769 So.2d 1177 , 1178 State v. Filer, 00-0073 (La.6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1080, 1081 .

12004–2004
State v. Tolbert neutral
lactapp · 1998
1 sentence

2001In State v. Tolbert, 30,821 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/98), 716 So.2d 949 , writ denied, 98-2562 (La.1/15/99), 736 So.2d 207 , this court held: When a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.

12001–2001
State v. Jordan neutral
la · 1999
1 sentence

2001In State v. Tolbert, 30,821 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/98), 716 So.2d 949 , writ denied, 98-2562 (La.1/15/99), 736 So.2d 207 , this court held: When a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.

12001–2001
City of Monroe v. Wyrick green
la · 1981
1 sentence

2000C.Cr.P. art. 556.1(A) incorporates this Court's preference for personal colloquies between a trial judge and a defendant entering a guilty plea, see State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779, 781 (La.1980) ("The only realistic means of assuring that the trial judge leaves a record adequate for any later review is to require that the record contain on its face direct evidence that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.") (citations omitted), and while the failure of a trial judge

12000–2000
State v. Baker green
la · 1992
1 sentence

1996App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992), cert. den. 506 U.S. 818 , 113 S.Ct. 62 , 121 L.Ed.2d 30 (1992): Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police.

11996–1996
Manatt v. Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners green
scotus · 1992
1 sentence

1996App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992), cert. den. 506 U.S. 818 , 113 S.Ct. 62 , 121 L.Ed.2d 30 (1992): Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police.

11996–1996
Kuhn v. Kuhn green
scotus · 1992
1 sentence

1996App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992), cert. den. 506 U.S. 818 , 113 S.Ct. 62 , 121 L.Ed.2d 30 (1992): Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police.

11996–1996
Edward D. Jones & Co. v. Carter green
scotus · 1992
1 sentence

1996App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992), cert. den. 506 U.S. 818 , 113 S.Ct. 62 , 121 L.Ed.2d 30 (1992): Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police.

11996–1996
Miranda v. Arizona green
scotus · 1966
1 sentence

1991Therefore, the state was required only to show that defendant had been advised of his constitutional rights and waived the same before making his statements." Id., 499 So.2d at pps. 304 and 305. (emphasis added) Once a defendant invokes his constitutional right to silence, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the *1329 "scrupulous honoring" of the right by the police.

11991–1991
State v. McCarty green
la · 1982
1 sentence

1984State v. McCarty, 421 So.2d 213 (La.1982).

11984–1984
State v. Mouton green
la · 1978
1 sentence

1982State v. Mouton, 366 So.2d 1336 (La.1978); State v. Peevy, 321 So.2d 324 (La.1975).

11982–1982
State v. Shea green
la · 1982
1 sentence

1982State v. Kevin Michael Shea, 421 So.2d 200 (La.1982) (on rehearing).

11982–1982
State v. Peevy green
la · 1975
1 sentence

1982State v. Mouton, 366 So.2d 1336 (La.1978); State v. Peevy, 321 So.2d 324 (La.1975).

11982–1982
State v. Thucos green
la · 1980
1 sentence

1981Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); State v. Thucos, 390 So.2d 1281 (La., 1980); State v. Manning, supra. The State's burden here is a *671 heavy one.

11981–1981

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:451 (16) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30 (8) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:567 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 3 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:27 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30.1 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:42 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:149.1 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:438 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 46:1844 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check