Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
29 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2026 13 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Smithgreen2 sentences2001App. 153, 167 , 916 P.2d 960 (1996) (100-year sentence — 3.1 times the top of the standard range — neither untenable nor clearly excessive); State v. Overvold, 64 Wn. 2000App. 153, 167 , 916 P.2d 960 (1996) (sentence 3 times the top of the standard range); State v. Overvold, 64 Wn. | 2 | 3 |
State v. Evansgreen2 sentences2023State v. Evans, 154 Wn.2d 438, 441-42 , 114 P.3d 627 (2005). 2008SMC 16.61.5055(A); see State v. Evans, 154 Wn.2d 438, 441-42 , 114 P.3d 627 (2005) (holding that the maximum sentence a judge can impose without finding additional facts for Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, chapter 9.94A RCW, purposes is “the top of the standard sentencing range”). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Evansgreen2 sentences2023State v. Evans, 154 Wn.2d 438, 441-42 , 114 P.3d 627 (2005). 2008SMC 16.61.5055(A); see State v. Evans, 154 Wn.2d 438, 441-42 , 114 P.3d 627 (2005) (holding that the maximum sentence a judge can impose without finding additional facts for Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, chapter 9.94A RCW, purposes is “the top of the standard sentencing range”). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Gordongreen1 sentence2025See Gordon, 172 Wn.2d at 676 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Brunegreen1 sentence2000See State v. Brune, 45 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ritchiegreen2 sentences1996Cf. Ritchie, 126 Wash.2d at 399-400 , 894 P.2d 1308 (upholding a 26-year sentence for the rape of a 6 ½-week-old baby by a defendant who had an offender score of 0 and who penetrated the baby with his little finger). 1996Cf. Ritchie, 126 Wash.2d at 399-400 , 894 P.2d 1308 (upholding a 26-year sentence for the rape of a 6 ½-week-old baby by a defendant who had an offender score of 0 and who penetrated the baby with his little finger). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Meippen
green
2 sentences2022The trial court nonetheless imposed a sentence that was at the top of the standard range, finding the defendant’s actions were “cold and calculated.” Id. at 317 . 2022The trial court nonetheless imposed a sentence that was at the top of the standard range, finding the defendant’s actions were “cold and calculated.” Id. at 317 . | 6 | 2020–2022 |
Blakely v. Washington
green
2 sentences2024For support, he 21 84803-8-I/22 cites Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S. Ct. 2531 , 159 L. 2024For support, he 21 84803-8-I/22 cites Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S. Ct. 2531 , 159 L. | 3 | 2005–2024 |
Grayson v. Dretke
green
2 sentences2015State v. Evans, 154 Wn.2d 438, 441-42 , 114 P.3d 627 , cert, denied. 546 U.S. 983 (2005). 2015State v. Evans, 154 Wn.2d 438, 441-42 , 114 P.3d 627 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 983 (2005). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Overvold
green
2 sentences2001App. 153, 167 , 916 P.2d 960 (1996) (100-year sentence — 3.1 times the top of the standard range — neither untenable nor clearly excessive); State v. Overvold, 64 Wn. 2000App. 153, 167 , 916 P.2d 960 (1996) (sentence 3 times the top of the standard range); State v. Overvold, 64 Wn. | 2 | 2000–2001 |
State v. Luthi
green
1 sentence2026As our Supreme Court recognized in Luthi, the in-court holding cell created “extreme prejudice.” 3 Wn.3d at 263 n.7. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Blake
green
2 sentences2025In 2024, Bassell was resentenced pursuant to State v. Blake, 197 Wn.2d 170 , 481 P.3d 521 (2021). 2025In 2024, Bassell was resentenced pursuant to State v. Blake, 197 Wn.2d 170 , 481 P.3d 521 (2021). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In re Pers. Restraint of Domingo-Cornelio
green
1 sentence2023Id. at 260 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Anders v. California
green
2 sentences2021Because Taylor was sentenced at the top of the standard range and we cannot presume that the trial court would not have imposed a lower sentence 1 Taylor’s appointed appellate counsel originally moved for permission to withdraw under RAP 15.2(i) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L. 2021Because Taylor was sentenced at the top of the standard range and we cannot presume that the trial court would not have imposed a lower sentence 1 Taylor’s appointed appellate counsel originally moved for permission to withdraw under RAP 15.2(i) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence2021App. 231, 238 , 11 P.3d 878 (2000). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence2021And in State v. Williams, the State set forth multiple potential aggravators and argued that its recommendation for the top of the standard range was really the “‘minimum’” sentence that would be appropriate. 103 Wn. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Houston-Sconiers
green
1 sentence2019Several years after Meippen's sentencing, this court decided State v. Houston-Sconiers . 1 In Houston-Sconiers , this court held that when sentencing a juvenile in adult court, a trial court has absolute discretion to depart from the standard sentencing ranges and mandatory sentence enhancements prescribed by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW. 188 Wash.2d at 9, 391 P.3d 409 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Fisher
neutral
2 sentences2017Fisher appeals. 3 Id. 4 Id. at 927 . 5 Id. 6 State v. Fisher, No. 45129-8-11, slip op. (unpublished portion) at 17, https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/D2%2045129-8-11°/020Part%20 Published%200pinion.pdf. 2017Fisher appeals. 3 Id. 4 Id. at 927 . 5 Id. 6 State v. Fisher, No. 45129-8-11, slip op. (unpublished portion) at 17, https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/D2%2045129-8-11°/020Part%20 Published%200pinion.pdf. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Illinois v. Allen
green
2 sentences2015Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337 , 90 S. Ct. 1057 , 25 L. 2015Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337 , 90 S. Ct. 1057 , 25 L. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Grayson
green
1 sentence2012Grayson, 130 Wn. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc.
green
1 sentence2011His appeal was stayed in 2008 because of the pending public trial issues in State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 160 (2010) and State v. Strode, 167 Wn.2d 222 , 217 P.3d 310 (2009). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Strode
green
1 sentence2011His appeal was stayed in 2008 because of the pending public trial issues in State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 160 (2010) and State v. Strode, 167 Wn.2d 222 , 217 P.3d 310 (2009). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Momah
green
1 sentence2011His appeal was stayed in 2008 because of the pending public trial issues in State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 160 (2010) and State v. Strode, 167 Wn.2d 222 , 217 P.3d 310 (2009). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Strode
green
1 sentence2011His appeal was stayed in 2008 because of the pending public trial issues in State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 160 (2010) and State v. Strode, 167 Wn.2d 222 , 217 P.3d 310 (2009). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Momah
green
1 sentence2011His appeal was stayed in 2008 because of the pending public trial issues in State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 160 (2010) and State v. Strode, 167 Wn.2d 222 , 217 P.3d 310 (2009). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Vaughn
green
2 sentences2000App. 440, 450 , 825 P.2d 729 (1992) (sentence 3 times the top of the standard range); State v. Vaughn, 83 Wn. 2000App. 669, 680 , 924 P.2d 27 (1996), review denied, 131 Wn.2d 1018 (1997) (sentence 2.5 times the top of the standard range). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Pryor
green
1 sentence1994In so doing, we are aware that [t]he Washington Supreme Court has admonished that "[t]he maximum sentence is to be imposed for only the 'worst case' scenario when, the 'circumstances of the crime distinguish it from other crimes of the same statutory category.'" State v. Pryor, 56 Wn. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.