Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
28 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bailey v. Rahegreen2 sentences2013See also Bailey v. Rahe, 355 Ark. 560 , 142 S.W.3d 634 (2004) (remanding for consideration of the Chrisco factors in a guardianship case where we were unable to discern from the court’s remarks its basis for reducing the requested attorney’s fees). 2013See also Bailey v. Rahe, 355 Ark. 560 , 142 S.W.3d 634 (2004) (remanding for consideration of the Chrisco factors in a guardianship case where we were unable to discern from the court’s remarks its basis for reducing the requested attorney’s fees). | 3 | 5 |
Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.green2 sentences2022For reversal, State Appellants argue that the circuit court erred in awarding attorneys’ fees and in its application of the Chrisco factors, as set forth in Chrisco v. Sun Industries, 304 Ark. 227 , 800 S.W.2d 717 (1990). 2022For reversal, State Appellants argue that the circuit court erred in awarding attorneys’ fees and in its application of the Chrisco factors, as set forth in Chrisco v. Sun Industries, 304 Ark. 227 , 800 S.W.2d 717 (1990). | 2 | 11 |
Jones v. Barnettgreen2 sentences2005The court stated that "[C]learly, the trial court did not consider or allude to either the Jones [ v. Barnett, 236 Ark. 117 , 365 S.W.2d 241 (1963)] factors or the Chrisco factors. . . ." Id. at 566, 142 S.W.3d 634 . 2005The court stated that "[C]learly, the trial court did not consider or allude to either the Jones [ v. Barnett, 236 Ark. 117 , 365 S.W.2d 241 (1963)] factors or the Chrisco factors. . . ." Id. at 566, 142 S.W.3d 634 . | 1 | 2 |
City of Little Rock v. Ladonna Nelson, as Parent and Next Friend of Ricky Nelson, Individually, and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situatedgreen2 sentences2025See City of Little Rock v. Nelson, 2020 Ark. 19, at 5 , 592 S.W.3d 666 , 669. 2025See City of Little Rock v. Nelson, 2020 Ark. 19, at 5 , 592 S.W.3d 666 , 669. | 1 | 1 |
Kbx, Inc. Steven Michael Keith, Sr., Individually Steven Michael Keith, Jr., Individually Jeffrey Shay Sebree, Individually v. Zero Grade Farms, a Partnership, Also D/B/A Isbell Farms Mark Isbell, Individually Chris Isbell, Individually Shane Isbell, Individually Judy Isbell, Individually Jeremy Jones, Individually K&K Farm Service, Inc., Also D/B/A K&K Farm Services Edward Schafer & Sons, a Partnership Ronald Schafer and Roger Schafer, as Trustees of the Edward Burnard Schafer Q-Tip Trust Ronald Schafer, Individually Dee Anne Schafer, Individually Clifford Schafer, Individually Rachel Schafer, Individually Roger Schafer, Individually Pamela Schafer, Individually Donald Schafer, Individually Donna Schafer, Individually Gary Hardke Farms, a Partnership Gary Hardke, Individually Melodie Hardke, Individually, and Bigfoot Ag, Inc.green2 sentences2023See KBX, Inc. v. Zero Grade Farms, 2022 Ark. 42, at 26 , 639 S.W.3d 352, 368 (describing standard of review). 2023See KBX, Inc. v. Zero Grade Farms, 2022 Ark. 42, at 26 , 639 S.W.3d 352, 368 (describing standard of review). | 1 | 1 |
Clowers v. Stickelgreen2 sentences2012See, e.g., Clowers v. Stickel, 2012 Ark. 2012See, e.g., Clowers v. Stickel, 2012 Ark. | 1 | 1 |
Phi Kappa Tau Housing Corp. v. Wengertgreen2 sentences2004See, e.g., Phi Kappa Tau Housing Corp. v. Wengert, 350 Ark. 335 , 86 S.W.3d 856 (2002). 2004See, e.g., Phi Kappa Tau Housing Corp. v. Wengert, 350 Ark. 335 , 86 S.W.3d 856 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Guardianship of Ratcliffgreen2 sentences2004Id.; see also Johnson v. Guardianship of Ratcliff, 72 Ark. 2004Id.; see also Johnson v. Guardianship of Ratcliff, 72 Ark. | 1 | 1 |
Hale v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See Hale v. State, 343 Ark. 62 , 31 S.W.3d 850 (2000). [4] The majority cites the guardianship case of Jones v. Barnett, 236 Ark. 117 , 365 S.W.2d 241 (1963), for the proposition that the requirements set out in Jones were similar to the Chrisco factors. 2004See Hale v. State, 343 Ark. 62 , 31 S.W.3d 850 (2000). [4] The majority cites the guardianship case of Jones v. Barnett, 236 Ark. 117 , 365 S.W.2d 241 (1963), for the proposition that the requirements set out in Jones were similar to the Chrisco factors. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Williamson
green
2 sentences2026The order here does not do so; instead, it conclusorily states that the circuit court considered the Chrisco factors; the holding in Davis, 359 Ark. 33 , 194 S.W.3d 197 , which dealt with the financial disparity of the parties; and its award of ad litem fees before it awarded attorney’s fees to Scarborough. 2026The order here does not do so; instead, it conclusorily states that the circuit court considered the Chrisco factors; the holding in Davis, 359 Ark. 33 , 194 S.W.3d 197 , which dealt with the financial disparity of the parties; and its award of ad litem fees before it awarded attorney’s fees to Scarborough. | 5 | 2006–2026 |
Tiner v. Tiner
green
2 sentences2024App. 483 , 422 S.W.3d 178 , we distinguished Bailey and other similar cases and held that an analysis of the Chrisco factors is not required in domestic- relations cases when considering an award of attorney’s fees. 2024App. 483 , 422 S.W.3d 178 , we distinguished Bailey and other similar cases and held that an analysis of the Chrisco factors is not required in domestic- relations cases when considering an award of attorney’s fees. | 4 | 2015–2024 |
Paulson v. Paulson
green
2 sentences2026App. 306 , 652 S.W.2d 46 (1983) (stating that an exhaustive hearing is not required on the amount of attorney’s fees because the court has presided over the proceedings and gained familiarity with the case and the services rendered 4 The Chrisco factors include the experience and ability of the attorney; the time and labor required to perform the legal service properly; the amount involved in the case and the results obtained; the novelty and difficulty of the issues involved; the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; whether the fee is fixed or contingent; the ti 2026App. 306 , 652 S.W.2d 46 (1983) (stating that an exhaustive hearing is not required on the amount of attorney’s fees because the court has presided over the proceedings and gained familiarity with the case and the services rendered 4 The Chrisco factors include the experience and ability of the attorney; the time and labor required to perform the legal service properly; the amount involved in the case and the results obtained; the novelty and difficulty of the issues involved; the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; whether the fee is fixed or contingent; the ti | 2 | 2012–2026 |
Stout v. Stout
green
2 sentences2012In arguing that she should have received a greater award, Betty contends that the circuit court erred in not considering and discussing the factors set forth in Chrisco v. Sun Indus., Inc., 304 Ark. 227 , 800 S.W.2d 717 (1990). 3 According to Betty, the circuit court’s award must be reversed and remanded pursuant to our decision in Stout, supra. In Stout, this court reversed and remanded an award of attorney’s fees because “the trial court awarded attorney’s fees without any discussion whatsoever and without providing any pertinent analysis of the Chrisco factors.” Stout, 2011 Ark. 2012In arguing that she should have received a greater award, Betty contends that the circuit court erred in not considering and discussing the factors set forth in Chrisco v. Sun Indus., Inc., 304 Ark. 227 , 800 S.W.2d 717 (1990). 3 According to Betty, the circuit court’s award must be reversed and remanded pursuant to our decision in Stout, supra. In Stout, this court reversed and remanded an award of attorney’s fees because “the trial court awarded attorney’s fees without any discussion whatsoever and without providing any pertinent analysis of the Chrisco factors.” Stout, 2011 Ark. | 2 | 2011–2012 |
South Beach Beverage Co. v. Harris Brands, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011See Bailey v. Rahe, 355 Ark. 560 , 142 S.W.3d 634 (2004); South Beach Beverage Co. v. Harris Brands, Inc., 355 Ark. 347 , 138 S.W.3d 102 (2003); see also Lake View Sch. 2011See Bailey v. Rahe, 355 Ark. 560 , 142 S.W.3d 634 (2004); South Beach Beverage Co. v. Harris Brands, Inc., 355 Ark. 347 , 138 S.W.3d 102 (2003); see also Lake View Sch. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
green
2 sentences2024In Abrego, our supreme court similarly reversed and remanded for the circuit court to award attorney’s fees and costs that “were reasonable, proper, necessary and incurred in good faith and with due diligence.” 281 Ark. at 319 , 664 S.W.2d at 863 . 2024In Abrego, our supreme court similarly reversed and remanded for the circuit court to award attorney’s fees and costs that “were reasonable, proper, necessary and incurred in good faith and with due diligence.” 281 Ark. at 319 , 664 S.W.2d at 863 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Samuel L. Conley v. Althea T. Conley
green
1 sentence2024Conley v. Conley, 2019 Ark. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Walther v. Wilson
green
2 sentences2020Accordingly, we remand to the circuit court for it to consider the Chrisco factors in determining whether the amount 6 of fees requested by Wilson is reasonable under the circumstances.” Wilson II, 2019 Ark. 105, at 7 , 571 S.W.3d at 901 . 2020Accordingly, we remand to the circuit court for it to consider the Chrisco factors in determining whether the amount 6 of fees requested by Wilson is reasonable under the circumstances.” Wilson II, 2019 Ark. 105, at 7 , 571 S.W.3d at 901 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Vice v. Vice
green
2 sentences2018Id. 2018Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Lake View School District No. 25 v. Huckabee
green
2 sentences2012Lake View, however, was a self-described “unique case with a 114unique set of circumstances.” Lake View, 351 Ark. at 96 , 91 S.W.3d at 510 . 2012Lake View, however, was a self-described “unique case with a 114unique set of circumstances.” Lake View, 351 Ark. at 96 , 91 S.W.3d at 510 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Scott v. Estate of Prendergast
green
2 sentences2011Bailey v. Rahe, 355 Ark. 560 , 142 S.W.3d 634 (2004); Swink, supra; Scott v. Estate of Prendergast, 90 Ark. 2011Bailey v. Rahe, 355 Ark. 560 , 142 S.W.3d 634 (2004); Swink, supra; Scott v. Estate of Prendergast, 90 Ark. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Harris v. City of Fort Smith
green
2 sentences2007Id. 2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.