Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
28 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1922–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Specialized Loan Servicing, L.L.C. v. Januarygreen1 sentence2015After previously determining the plaintiffs did in fact have a right of action to challenge the sales under La.Civ.Code art. 1926, we now determine whether or not the grant of exception of prescription was proper. | ^Standard of Review Generally, “[w]hen prescription is raised by peremptory exception, with evidence being introduced at the hearing on the exception, the trial court’s findings of fact on the issue of prescription are subject to the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review.” Specialized Loan Servicing L.L.C. v. January, 12-2668, pp. 3-4 (La.6/28/13), 119 So.3d 582, 584 (cit | 1 | 1 |
Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.green2 sentences2008Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 837 So.2d at 1216 ; Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015 (La.11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885 ; Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 1095 , 262 So.2d 328, 333 (1972). 2008Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 837 So.2d at 1216 ; Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015 (La.11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885 ; Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 1095 , 262 So.2d 328, 333 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
Sierra Club v. Mortongreen2 sentences1981See Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 92 S.Ct. 1361 [ 31 L.Ed.2d 636 ] (1972). 1981See Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 92 S.Ct. 1361 [ 31 L.Ed.2d 636 ] (1972). | 1 | 1 |
Bamber Contractors, Inc. v. Henderson Bros., Inc.green1 sentence1979As stated by this court in Bamber Contractors, Inc. v. Henderson Brothers, Inc., 345 So.2d 1212, 1214 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1977): “[T]he objection of no right of action raises the question of whether a remedy afforded by the law can be invoked by a particular plaintiff. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin
green
2 sentences2012Id. at 12, 837 So.2d at 1216 . 2010Id., citing Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n., 94-2015, p. 5 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885, 888 . | 6 | 2006–2012 |
La. Paddlewheels v. La. Riverboat Gaming
green
2 sentences2010Id., citing Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n., 94-2015, p. 5 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885, 888 . 2010Id. | 6 | 2003–2010 |
Vitale v. Checker Cab Co.
green
2 sentences1976That opinion says no more than the wife's right of action for wrongful death "* * * ought to depend upon whether the husband would have had a right of action to claim damages for the physical injuries suffered by him if they had not been fatal. * * *" 117 So. at 583 . 1975In other words, the child or any other of the beneficiaries mentioned in the amendment of the statute should not have a right of action for damages for physical injury causing the death of the person injured, unless he would have had a right of action if the injuries had not caused his death.” The trial judge, in arriving at that conclusion, drew an analogy between this claim and the claim of a surviving spouse in the case of Vitale v. Checker Cab Company, 166 La. 527 , 117 So. 579 , and particularly the concurring opinion of the late Chief Justice O’Niell on page 582 thereof. | 2 | 1975–1976 |
Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Ed. Fund
green
2 sentences2014“A proper ^analysis of a no right of action exception requires a court to determine whether the plaintiff belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the suit.” Id., 07-2224, p. 17, 986 So.2d at 60 . 2014“If the pleadings state a right of action in the plaintiff, the exceptor may introduce evidence to controvert the pleadings on the trial of the exception, and the plaintiff may introduce evidence to controvert any objections.” Id., 07-2224, pp. 16-17, 986 So.2d at 59 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Honeywell, Inc. v. Sierra
green
1 sentence2014The no right of action exception “cannot be used to determine whether a defendant can stand in judgment or to urge that plaintiff has no right of action because there is a valid defense.” Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
green
2 sentences2010Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211 ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), 33 So.3d 227 , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), 36 So.3d 254 ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App. 4th Cir.02/10/10), 47 So.3d 428 , reh’g granted, (04/21/10). 2010Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211 ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), 33 So.3d 227 , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), 36 So.3d 254 ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App. 4th Cir.02/10/10), 47 So.3d 428 , reh'g granted, (04/21/10). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Soileau v. SMITH'S TRUE VALUE AND RENTAL
green
2 sentences2010Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211 ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), 33 So.3d 227 , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), 36 So.3d 254 ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App. 4th Cir.02/10/10), 47 So.3d 428 , reh’g granted, (04/21/10). 2010Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211 ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), 33 So.3d 227 , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), 36 So.3d 254 ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App. 4th Cir.02/10/10), 47 So.3d 428 , reh'g granted, (04/21/10). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Skannal v. Bamburg
green
2 sentences2010Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211 ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), 33 So.3d 227 , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), 36 So.3d 254 ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App. 4th Cir.02/10/10), 47 So.3d 428 , reh’g granted, (04/21/10). 2010Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211 ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), 33 So.3d 227 , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), 36 So.3d 254 ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App. 4th Cir.02/10/10), 47 So.3d 428 , reh'g granted, (04/21/10). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Falco Lime, Inc. v. PLAQUEMINE CONTRACTING CO.
green
2 sentences2010Id., 95-1784 at pp. 5-6, 672 So.2d at 359 . 2010Id., 95-1784 at pp. 5-6, 672 So.2d at 359 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc.
green
2 sentences2010Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211 ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), 33 So.3d 227 , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), 36 So.3d 254 ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App. 4th Cir.02/10/10), 47 So.3d 428 , reh’g granted, (04/21/10). 2010Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211 ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), 33 So.3d 227 , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), 36 So.3d 254 ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App. 4th Cir.02/10/10), 47 So.3d 428 , reh'g granted, (04/21/10). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
McLean v. DAVIE SHORING, INC.
neutral
1 sentence2010McLean, supra, pp.7-8 , 976 So.2d at 737 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
ACORN COMMUNITY LAND ASS'N OF LA. v. Zeno
neutral
1 sentence2006Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, supra. Acorn Cmty. Land Ass’n of Louisiana, Inc. v. Zeno, 05-1489, pp. 3-4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/21/06), 936 So.2d 836 , 838-39. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Simmons v. Chambliss
neutral
1 sentence2003Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n, 94-2015 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885 ; Simmons v. Chambliss, 37,461 (La.App.2d Cir.8/20/03), 852 So.2d 1237 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Cutitto v. Boyes
neutral
1 sentence1998In Cutitto v. Boyes, 97-63 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97) , 695 So.2d 1080 at 1084 , this court discussed the law regarding the no right of action exception. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Niemann v. Travelers Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1991As stated in Neimann, supra, if the UM carrier is to be afforded broader rights than presently granted by Title 22, this expansion will have to be implemented by the legislature. [2] CONCLUSION Based upon the foregoing, we find that the trial court erred in finding that the exception of no right of action filed by Patrick Roark was moot. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Frazier v. Green Steel Bldg., Inc.
green
1 sentence1988Frazier v. Green Steel Building, Inc., 409 So.2d 1290 (La.App. 2d Cir.1982). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Carso v. Board of Liquidation of State Debt
green
2 sentences1987Plaintiffs reason that, as taxpayers, voters, and residents of the State of Louisiana and as associations of corporations with a more particularized interest, they have the right of action to challenge as unconstitutional certain acts of the 1986 Extraordinary Session, citing Carso v. Board of Liquidation of State Debt, 205 La. 368 , 17 So.2d 358 (1944). 1987Plaintiffs reason that, as taxpayers, voters, and residents of the State of Louisiana and as associations of corporations with a more particularized interest, they have the right of action to challenge as unconstitutional certain acts of the 1986 Extraordinary Session, citing Carso v. Board of Liquidation of State Debt, 205 La. 368 , 17 So.2d 358 (1944). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Selber Bros., Inc. v. Bryant
neutral
1 sentence1985Babineaux, supra; Morton, supra; Selbar Bros., Inc. v. Bryant, 406 So.2d 251 (La.1981). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Marquis v. Cantu
green
1 sentence1984Marquis v. Cantu, supra . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Otis v. Texas Co.
green
2 sentences1950Otis v. Texas Co., 153 La. 384 , 96 So. 1 , and authorities there cited and J. 1950Otis v. Texas Co., 153 La. 384 , 96 So. 1 , and authorities there cited and J. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Toles v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
neutral
1 sentence1943Co., La.App., 166 So. 172 ), that, since the policy is payable to the executor or administrator of the insured's estate, plaintiff would ordinarily be without a right of action to claim the proceeds because she is neither the executrix or administratrix of her mother's succession nor has she been recognized as the heir of her mother and put in possession of the estate by judgment of court. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Delahoussaye v. Dumartrait
neutral
1 sentence1922Delahoussaye v. Dumartrait, 16 La. 91 ; Thompson v. Milburn, 1 Mart. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.