Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
28 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ropergreen2 sentences2014The outcome of plain error review “depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Roper, 136 S.W.3d at 900 . 2014The outcome of plain error review, furthermore, “depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” State v. Roper, 136 S.W.3d 891, 900 (Mo. App. 2004). | 7 | 13 |
State v. Raygreen2 sentences2015Id. at 726-27 (quoting State v. Ray, 407 S.W.3d 162, 170 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013)). 2014State v. Ray, 407 S.W.3d 162, 170 (Mo.App.E.D.2013) (internal citations and quotations omitted). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Ralstongreen2 sentences2015State v. Ralston, 400 S.W.3d 511, 520 (Mo. App.2013). 2013“The outcome of plain error review, furthermore, depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Ralston, 400 S.W.3d at 520 (quoting Dean, 382 S.W.3d at 224 ). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Fickegreen2 sentences2007State v. Roper, 136 S.W.3d 891, 900 (Mo.App.2004); State v. Ficke, 892 S.W.2d 814, 817 (Mo.App.1995). 2007State v. Roper, 136 S.W.3d 891, 900 (Mo.App.2004); State v. Ficke, 892 S.W.2d 814, 817 (Mo.App.1995). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Sidebottomgreen2 sentences2007“This is because ‘alleged errors committed in closing argument do not justify relief under the plain error rule unless they are determined to have a decisive effect on the jury.’ ” Vaughn, 32 S.W.3d at 800 (quoting State v. Sidebottom, 753 S.W.2d 915, 920 (Mo. banc 1988)). 2006This is because “alleged errors committed in closing argument do not justify relief under the plain error rule unless they are determined to have a decisive effect on the jury.” State v. Sidebottom, 753 S.W.2d 915, 920 (Mo. banc 1988). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Kempkergreen2 sentences2007“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. “ ‘Plain error will seldom be found in unobjected closing argument.’” State v. Vaughn, 32 S.W.3d 798, 800 (Mo.App.2000) (quoting State v. Kempker, 824 S.W.2d 909, 911 (Mo. banc 1992)). 2006“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. “[P]lain error will seldom be found in unobjected closing argument.” State v. Kempker, 824 S.W.2d 909, 911 (Mo. banc 1992). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2013“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. (citing Williams, 9 S.W.3d at 12 ). 2013“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. (citing Williams, 9 S.W.3d at 12 ). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Deangreen2 sentences2013“The outcome of plain error review, furthermore, depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Ralston, 400 S.W.3d at 520 (quoting Dean, 382 S.W.3d at 224 ). 2013To reiterate, the outcome of plain error review “depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Dean, 382 S.W.3d at 224 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2009“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. “ ‘Instructional error seldom constitutes plain error, which requires a defendant to demonstrate more than mere prejudice.’ ” State v. Darden, 263 S.W.3d 760, 763 (Mo.App.2008) (quoting State v. Thomas, 75 S.W.3d 788, 791 (Mo.App. 2002)). “ ‘For instructional error to rise to the level of plain error, the trial court must have so misdirected or failed to instruct the jury that it is apparent to the appellate court that the instructional error affected the jury’s verdict.’ ” Id. “ ‘In d 2009“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. “ ‘Instructional error seldom constitutes plain error, which requires a defendant to demonstrate more than mere prejudice.’ ” State v. Darden, 263 S.W.3d 760, 763 (Mo.App.2008) (quoting State v. Thomas, 75 S.W.3d 788, 791 (Mo.App. 2002)). “ ‘For instructional error to rise to the level of plain error, the trial court must have so misdirected or failed to instruct the jury that it is apparent to the appellate court that the instructional error affected the jury’s verdict.’ ” Id. “ ‘In d | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dardengreen1 sentence2009“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. “ ‘Instructional error seldom constitutes plain error, which requires a defendant to demonstrate more than mere prejudice.’ ” State v. Darden, 263 S.W.3d 760, 763 (Mo.App.2008) (quoting State v. Thomas, 75 S.W.3d 788, 791 (Mo.App. 2002)). “ ‘For instructional error to rise to the level of plain error, the trial court must have so misdirected or failed to instruct the jury that it is apparent to the appellate court that the instructional error affected the jury’s verdict.’ ” Id. “ ‘In d | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ukagreen1 sentence2009“Trial courts retain broad discretion over issues of relevancy and admissibility of evidence, and we will not interfere with those decisions unless there is a clear showing of abuse of discretion.” State v. Uka, 25 S.W.3d 624, 627 (Mo.App.2000). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Comtegreen1 sentence2008“When guilt is established by overwhelming evidence, no injustice or miscarriage of justice results requiring relief under the rule.” State v. Comte, 141 S.W.3d 89, 94 (Mo.App.2004). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Skippergreen1 sentence2008“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. ‘“Review of jury instructions for plain error is discretionary.’ ” State v. Skipper, 101 S.W.3d 350, 355 (Mo.App.2003) (quoting State v. Johnson, 95 S.W.3d 221, 225 (Mo.App.2003)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2008“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. ‘“Review of jury instructions for plain error is discretionary.’ ” State v. Skipper, 101 S.W.3d 350, 355 (Mo.App.2003) (quoting State v. Johnson, 95 S.W.3d 221, 225 (Mo.App.2003)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Collinsgreen1 sentence2008“Our review for plain error of a trial court’s failure to sua sponte declare a mistrial is extremely limited.” State v. Collins, 150 S.W.3d 340, 349 (Mo.App.2004). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Luegreen1 sentence2007In support of his assertion that we should review this point for plain error, Appellant cites to State v. Lue, 594 S.W.2d 351, 354 (Mo.App.1980). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Vaughngreen2 sentences2007“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. “ ‘Plain error will seldom be found in unobjected closing argument.’” State v. Vaughn, 32 S.W.3d 798, 800 (Mo.App.2000) (quoting State v. Kempker, 824 S.W.2d 909, 911 (Mo. banc 1992)). 2007“This is because ‘alleged errors committed in closing argument do not justify relief under the plain error rule unless they are determined to have a decisive effect on the jury.’ ” Vaughn, 32 S.W.3d at 800 (quoting State v. Sidebottom, 753 S.W.2d 915, 920 (Mo. banc 1988)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Scurlock
green
2 sentences2012“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. 2008“The outcome of plain error review depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. | 7 | 2006–2012 |
State v. Taylor
green
1 sentence2015Id. at 726-27 (quoting State v. Ray, 407 S.W.3d 162, 170 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013)). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.