Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
26 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
P.J.'s Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. v. Nextel West Corp.green2 sentences2008“The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.” EJ.’s Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. v. Nextel West Corp., 345 Ill. 2008"The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim." P.J.'s Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. v. Nextel West Corp., 345 Ill. | 6 | 8 |
Walczak v. Onyx Acceptance Corp.green2 sentences2016See Uesco Industries, Inc. v. Poolman of Wisconsin, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 112566, ¶ 45 .) ¶ 12 “ ‘The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.’ ” Walczak v. Onyx Acceptance Corp., 365 Ill. 2016See Uesco Industries, Inc. v. Poolman of Wisconsin, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 112566, ¶ 45 .) ¶ 12 “ ‘The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.’ ” Walczak v. Onyx Acceptance Corp., 365 Ill. | 6 | 6 |
Gordon v. Bodengreen2 sentences2025“The adequate representation requirement of section 2-801 ensures that class members receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests.” Bayeg, 2024 IL App (1st) 231141, ¶ 46 (citing Gordon v. Boden, 224 Ill. 2003“The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is merely to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.” Gordon, 224 Ill. | 5 | 13 |
Uesco Industries, Inc. v. Poolman of Wisconsin, Inc.green2 sentences2016See Uesco Industries, Inc. v. Poolman of Wisconsin, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 112566, ¶ 45 .) ¶ 12 “ ‘The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.’ ” Walczak v. Onyx Acceptance Corp., 365 Ill. 2016See Uesco Industries, Inc. v. Poolman of Wisconsin, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 112566, ¶ 45 .) ¶ 12 “ ‘The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.’ ” Walczak v. Onyx Acceptance Corp., 365 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Cruz v. Unilock Chicago, Inc.green2 sentences2015Cruz v. Unilock Chicago, Inc., 383 Ill. 2014Cruz v. Unilock Chicago, Inc., 383 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Miner v. Gillette Co.green1 sentence2025App. 3d 195, 203 (1991)). ¶ 59 “The test applied to determine adequacy of representation is whether the interests of those who are parties are the same as those who are not joined and whether the litigating parties fairly represent those not joined.” Miner v. Gillette Co., 87 Ill. 2d 7, 14 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Bayeg v. The Admiral at the Lakegreen1 sentence2025“The adequate representation requirement of section 2-801 ensures that class members receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests.” Bayeg, 2024 IL App (1st) 231141, ¶ 46 (citing Gordon v. Boden, 224 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ramirez v. Smart Corp.
green
2 sentences2016The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is merely to ensure that all class members will receive proper and efficient protection of their interests in the proceedings. - 16 - No. 1-14-3733 Ramirez, 371 Ill. 2016Id. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Clark v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.
green
2 sentences2007According to Sprint, Hall's interest in pursuing her claims on behalf of a class conflicts with the interests of class members who do not want to be exposed to litigation as a result of her actions. " 'The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is merely to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.' " Clark, 343 Ill. 2007According to Sprint, Hall’s interest in pursuing her claims on behalf of a class conflicts with the interests of class members who do not want to be exposed to litigation as a result of her actions. “ ‘The purpose of the adequate representation requirement is merely to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.’ ” Clark, 343 Ill. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences2004Avery, 321 Ill. 2004Avery , 321 Ill. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Purcell & Wardrope Chartered v. Hertz Corp.
green
1 sentence1991Purcell, 175 Ill. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.