Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
26 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2026 16 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of the Orland Fire Protection Districtgreen2 sentences2026We find that any error with regard to the trial court granting intervenor status to K.R.’s foster parents was invited by respondent. ¶ 32 The rule of invited error “prohibits a party from requesting to proceed in one manner and then contending on appeal that the requested action was error.” Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of Orland Fire Protection District, 2012 IL 110012, ¶ 33 . 2025See Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of Orland Fire Protection Dist., 2012 IL 110012, ¶ 33 (invited error rule “prohibits a party from requesting to proceed in one manner and then contending on appeal that the requested action was error.”). | 6 | 13 |
In Re Detention of Swopegreen2 sentences2025In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 (2004). 2025In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 (2004); Pellico v. Mork, 2018 IL App (2d) 170468, ¶ 20 . | 6 | 8 |
In re Marriage of Reidygreen2 sentences2026In re Marriage of Reidy, 2018 IL App (1st) 170054, ¶ 29 (“It is well-settled that a party cannot request to proceed in one manner at trial and then argue on appeal that the requested action was error.”), Direct Auto Insurance Co. v. Bahena, 2019 IL App (1st) 172918, ¶ 36 (“ ‘Under the invited-error doctrine, a - 15 - 1-24-1277) 1-24-2213) Cons. party cannot acquiesce to the manner in which the trial court proceeds and later claim on appeal that the trial court’s actions constituted error.’ ”). ¶ 48 Nor can we find, on this record, that the trial judge’s communication with the Presiding Judge’s 2022Pellico v. Mork, 2018 IL App (2d) 170468, ¶ 20 ; In re Marriage of Reidy, 2018 IL App (1st) 170054, ¶ 29 . | 1 | 2 |
People v. Harveygreen2 sentences2012People v. Harvey, 211 Ill.2d 368, 385 , 286 Ill.Dec. 124 , 813 N.E.2d 181 (2004). 2012People v. Harvey, 211 Ill.2d 368, 385 , 286 Ill.Dec. 124 , 813 N.E.2d 181 (2004). | 1 | 2 |
Direct Auto Insurance Co. v. Bahenagreen1 sentence2026In re Marriage of Reidy, 2018 IL App (1st) 170054, ¶ 29 (“It is well-settled that a party cannot request to proceed in one manner at trial and then argue on appeal that the requested action was error.”), Direct Auto Insurance Co. v. Bahena, 2019 IL App (1st) 172918, ¶ 36 (“ ‘Under the invited-error doctrine, a - 15 - 1-24-1277) 1-24-2213) Cons. party cannot acquiesce to the manner in which the trial court proceeds and later claim on appeal that the trial court’s actions constituted error.’ ”). ¶ 48 Nor can we find, on this record, that the trial judge’s communication with the Presiding Judge’s | 1 | 1 |
Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral Boardgreen1 sentence2021See Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of Orland Fire Protection Dist., 2012 IL 110012, ¶ 33 (noting that invited error prohibits a party from requesting to proceed in one manner and then contending on appeal that the requested action was error); Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral Bd., 228 Ill. 2d 200, 212-13 (2008) (noting that an argument or issue not presented in an administrative hearing is defaulted). ¶ 48 Second, even this procedural default aside, Dr. Khungar’s claim fails on the merits. “[I]n the absence of statutory provisions to the contrary, it is not necessary tha | 1 | 1 |
Homefinders, Inc. v. City of Evanstongreen1 sentence2021See Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of Orland Fire Protection Dist., 2012 IL 110012, ¶ 33 (noting that invited error prohibits a party from requesting to proceed in one manner and then contending on appeal that the requested action was error); Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral Bd., 228 Ill. 2d 200, 212-13 (2008) (noting that an argument or issue not presented in an administrative hearing is defaulted). ¶ 48 Second, even this procedural default aside, Dr. Khungar’s claim fails on the merits. “[I]n the absence of statutory provisions to the contrary, it is not necessary tha | 1 | 1 |
Forest Preserve District v. Illinois Labor Relations Boardgreen1 sentence2021See Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of Orland Fire Protection Dist., 2012 IL 110012, ¶ 33 (noting that invited error prohibits a party from requesting to proceed in one manner and then contending on appeal that the requested action was error); Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral Bd., 228 Ill. 2d 200, 212-13 (2008) (noting that an argument or issue not presented in an administrative hearing is defaulted). ¶ 48 Second, even this procedural default aside, Dr. Khungar’s claim fails on the merits. “[I]n the absence of statutory provisions to the contrary, it is not necessary tha | 1 | 1 |
People v. Kathy K.green1 sentence2018Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of the Orland Fire Protection District , 2012 IL 110012 , ¶ 33, 360 Ill.Dec. 549 , 969 N.E.2d 359 ; see also In re Stephen K. , 373 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pellico v. Mork
green
2 sentences2025In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 (2004); Pellico v. Mork, 2018 IL App (2d) 170468, ¶ 20 . 2025In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 (2004); Pellico v. Mork, 2018 IL App (2d) 170468, ¶ 20 . | 4 | 2022–2025 |
Gaffney v. ORLAND FIRE PROTECTION DIST.
green
2 sentences2018Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of the Orland Fire Protection District , 2012 IL 110012 , ¶ 33, 360 Ill.Dec. 549 , 969 N.E.2d 359 ; see also In re Stephen K. , 373 Ill. 2018Id. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Radford
green
1 sentence2025People v. Radford, 2020 IL 123975, ¶ 25 . ¶ 31 The doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from requesting to proceed in one manner and then arguing on appeal that the requested action was error. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Wild, Inc.
green
1 sentence2021However, since this court has an independent duty to consider its jurisdiction (J & J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Wild, Inc., 2015 IL App (5th) 140092, ¶ 33 ), we will consider Konewko’s argument. ¶ 11 Illinois Supreme Court Rule 304(a) provides, in pertinent part: “If multiple parties or multiple claims for relief are involved in an action, an appeal may be taken from a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the parties or claims only if the trial court has made an express written finding that there is no just reason for delaying either enforcement or appeal.” Ill. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.