opinion concerning some rule (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

opinion concerning some rule in Michigan

26 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2025 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

CaseFollowedCited
Wold Architects and Engineers v. Stratgreen
mich · 2006 · cited in 9 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2018–2025
2 sentences

2025In contrast, our Supreme Court has described “dicta” as “[s]tatements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand” that “lack the force of an adjudication.” Wold Architects & Engineers v Strat, 474 Mich. 223 , 232 n 3; 713 NW2d 750 (2006) (quotation marks and citations omitted).

2025In contrast, our Supreme Court has described “dicta” as “[s]tatements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand” that “lack the force of an adjudication.” Wold Architects & Engineers v Strat, 474 Mich. 223 , 232 n 3; 713 NW2d 750 (2006) (quotation marks and citations omitted).

49
People v. Casegreen
mich · 1922 · cited in 9 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1956–2019
2 sentences

2019While “ ‘[i]t is a well-settled rule that any statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or debated legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand are, however illuminating, but obiter dicta and lack the force of an adjudication,’ ” McNally v Wayne Co Bd of Canvassers, 316 Mich 551, 558 ; 25 NW2d 613 (1947), quoting People v Case, 16 220 Mich 379, 382-383 ; 190 NW2d 289 (1922), the identification of “contract” and “tort” as the two exclusive types of “civil wrongs” was, in my judgment, entirely necessary in the course of det

2018We are unable to deduce from the plain language of the Penal Code that, regardless of which code contains the offense, the Legislature manifested its intent that the Penal Code treat all offenses labeled as misdemeanors but punishable by up to two years' imprisonment as misdemeanors. 41 Smith , 423 Mich. at 434 , 378 N.W.2d 384 (opinion by Williams , C.J.). 42 See id . 43 People v. Peltola , 489 Mich. 174 , 190 n. 32, 803 N.W.2d 140 (2011) ; see also McNally v. Bd. of Canvassers of Wayne Co. , 316 Mich. 551 , 558, 25 N.W.2d 613 (1947) (" 'It is a well-settled rule that any statements and comme

29
Robinson v. Gordon Oil Co.green
mich · 1934 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1956–1991
2 sentences

1991See, also, Robinson v Gordon Oil Co, 266 Mich 65, 71 [ 253 NW 218 (1934)]. [Emphasis added.]

1991See, also, Robinson v Gordon Oil Co, 266 Mich 65, 71 [ 253 NW 218 (1934)]. [Emphasis added.]

22
McNally v. Wayne County Canvassersgreen
mich · 1946 · cited in 4 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2005–2020
2 sentences

2020“It is a well-settled rule that any statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or debated legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand are, however illuminating, but obiter dicta, and lack the force of an adjudication.” McNally v Bd of Canvassers of Wayne Co, 316 Mich 551, 558 ; 25 NW2d 613 (1947) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

2020“It is a well-settled rule that any statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or debated legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand are, however illuminating, but obiter dicta, and lack the force of an adjudication.” McNally v Bd of Canvassers of Wayne Co, 316 Mich 551, 558 ; 25 NW2d 613 (1947) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

14
People v. Tierneygreen
michctapp · 2005 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2016–2019
2 sentences

2019Dicta are “statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand[.]” People v Tierney, 266 Mich App 687, 713 ; 703 NW2d 204 (2005) (quotation marks, citation, and brackets omitted).

2019Dicta are “statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand[.]” People v Tierney, 266 Mich App 687, 713 ; 703 NW2d 204 (2005) (quotation marks, citation, and brackets omitted).

12
People v. Peltolagreen
mich · 2011 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018We are unable to deduce from the plain language of the Penal Code that, regardless of which code contains the offense, the Legislature manifested its intent that the Penal Code treat all offenses labeled as misdemeanors but punishable by up to two years' imprisonment as misdemeanors. 41 Smith , 423 Mich. at 434 , 378 N.W.2d 384 (opinion by Williams , C.J.). 42 See id . 43 People v. Peltola , 489 Mich. 174 , 190 n. 32, 803 N.W.2d 140 (2011) ; see also McNally v. Bd. of Canvassers of Wayne Co. , 316 Mich. 551 , 558, 25 N.W.2d 613 (1947) (" 'It is a well-settled rule that any statements and comme

2018We are unable to deduce from the plain language of the Penal Code that, regardless of which code contains the offense, the Legislature manifested its intent that the Penal Code treat all offenses labeled as misdemeanors but punishable by up to two years' imprisonment as misdemeanors. 41 Smith , 423 Mich. at 434 , 378 N.W.2d 384 (opinion by Williams , C.J.). 42 See id . 43 People v. Peltola , 489 Mich. 174 , 190 n. 32, 803 N.W.2d 140 (2011) ; see also McNally v. Bd. of Canvassers of Wayne Co. , 316 Mich. 551 , 558, 25 N.W.2d 613 (1947) (" 'It is a well-settled rule that any statements and comme

11
People v. Smithgreen
mich · 1985 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018We are unable to deduce from the plain language of the Penal Code that, regardless of which code contains the offense, the Legislature manifested its intent that the Penal Code treat all offenses labeled as misdemeanors but punishable by up to two years' imprisonment as misdemeanors. 41 Smith , 423 Mich. at 434 , 378 N.W.2d 384 (opinion by Williams , C.J.). 42 See id . 43 People v. Peltola , 489 Mich. 174 , 190 n. 32, 803 N.W.2d 140 (2011) ; see also McNally v. Bd. of Canvassers of Wayne Co. , 316 Mich. 551 , 558, 25 N.W.2d 613 (1947) (" 'It is a well-settled rule that any statements and comme

2018We are unable to deduce from the plain language of the Penal Code that, regardless of which code contains the offense, the Legislature manifested its intent that the Penal Code treat all offenses labeled as misdemeanors but punishable by up to two years' imprisonment as misdemeanors. 41 Smith , 423 Mich. at 434 , 378 N.W.2d 384 (opinion by Williams , C.J.). 42 See id . 43 People v. Peltola , 489 Mich. 174 , 190 n. 32, 803 N.W.2d 140 (2011) ; see also McNally v. Bd. of Canvassers of Wayne Co. , 316 Mich. 551 , 558, 25 N.W.2d 613 (1947) (" 'It is a well-settled rule that any statements and comme

11
Grace v. Gracegreen
michctapp · 2003 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005Therefore, plaintiffs remedies sound in contract and, plaintiffs fraud claim is not barred by the holding of Nederlander. [Grace, supra, at 364-365.] Despite the fact that the Grace decision addressed the merits of the issue, defendant relies on McNally v Bd of Canvassers of Wayne Co, 316 Mich 551, 557 ; 25 NW2d 613 (1947), for the proposition that “[w]hat is said in an opinion by way of illustration only is of no binding authority as a decision.” The McNally Court noted that a decision is generally not precedent with regard to a point that was not sufficiently argued and presented to the cour

11
Weller v. Manchagreen
mich · 1958 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005Obiter dicta are defined as “[statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand . .. .” Hett v Duffy, 346 Mich 456, 461 ; 78 NW2d 284 (1956), overruled on other grounds Weller v Mancha, 353 Mich 189, 194 (1958).

11
Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.green
mich · 1970 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See also Breckon v Franklin Fuel Co, 383 Mich 251, 267 ; 174 NW2d 836 (1970), overruled on other grounds Smith v Detroit, 388 Mich 637 ; 202 NW2d 300 (1972).

1999See also Breckon v Franklin Fuel Co, 383 Mich 251, 267 ; 174 NW2d 836 (1970), overruled on other grounds Smith v Detroit, 388 Mich 637 ; 202 NW2d 300 (1972).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Hett v. Duffy green
mich · 1956
2 sentences

2006“Dicta” is defined as follows: “ ‘Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand, are, however illuminating, but obiter dicta and lack the force of an adjudication.’ ” [Rowe v Montgomery Ward & Co, Inc, 437 Mich 627 , 719 n 101; 473 NW2d 268 (1991) (Levin, J., dissenting), quoting Hett v Duffy, 346 Mich 456, 461 ; 78 NW2d 284 (1956), quoting a headnote from People v Case, 220 Mich 379 ; 190 NW 289 (1922).] The issue presented in Chippewa was whether the arbitration agreement betw

2006“Dicta” is defined as follows: “ ‘Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand, are, however illuminating, but obiter dicta and lack the force of an adjudication.’ ” [Rowe v Montgomery Ward & Co, Inc, 437 Mich 627 , 719 n 101; 473 NW2d 268 (1991) (Levin, J., dissenting), quoting Hett v Duffy, 346 Mich 456, 461 ; 78 NW2d 284 (1956), quoting a headnote from People v Case, 220 Mich 379 ; 190 NW 289 (1922).] The issue presented in Chippewa was whether the arbitration agreement betw

61982–2006
Robinson v. City of Detroit green
mich · 2000
2 sentences

2007“Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand are obiter dicta, and lack the force of an adjudication.” Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed), defining “dictum.” Robinson v Detroit, 462 Mich 439 ; 613 NW2d 307 (2000). 190 Mich App 339, 342 ; 475 NW2d 60 (1991).

2007“Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand are obiter dicta, and lack the force of an adjudication.” Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed), defining “dictum.” Robinson v Detroit, 462 Mich 439 ; 613 NW2d 307 (2000). 190 Mich App 339, 342 ; 475 NW2d 60 (1991).

12007–2007
Zechlin v. Bridges Motor Sales neutral
michctapp · 1991
2 sentences

2007“Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand are obiter dicta, and lack the force of an adjudication.” Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed), defining “dictum.” Robinson v Detroit, 462 Mich 439 ; 613 NW2d 307 (2000). 190 Mich App 339, 342 ; 475 NW2d 60 (1991).

2007“Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand are obiter dicta, and lack the force of an adjudication.” Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed), defining “dictum.” Robinson v Detroit, 462 Mich 439 ; 613 NW2d 307 (2000). 190 Mich App 339, 342 ; 475 NW2d 60 (1991).

12007–2007
Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co. green
mich · 1991
2 sentences

2006“Dicta” is defined as follows: “ ‘Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand, are, however illuminating, but obiter dicta and lack the force of an adjudication.’ ” [Rowe v Montgomery Ward & Co, Inc, 437 Mich 627 , 719 n 101; 473 NW2d 268 (1991) (Levin, J., dissenting), quoting Hett v Duffy, 346 Mich 456, 461 ; 78 NW2d 284 (1956), quoting a headnote from People v Case, 220 Mich 379 ; 190 NW 289 (1922).] The issue presented in Chippewa was whether the arbitration agreement betw

2006“Dicta” is defined as follows: “ ‘Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case in hand, are, however illuminating, but obiter dicta and lack the force of an adjudication.’ ” [Rowe v Montgomery Ward & Co, Inc, 437 Mich 627 , 719 n 101; 473 NW2d 268 (1991) (Levin, J., dissenting), quoting Hett v Duffy, 346 Mich 456, 461 ; 78 NW2d 284 (1956), quoting a headnote from People v Case, 220 Mich 379 ; 190 NW 289 (1922).] The issue presented in Chippewa was whether the arbitration agreement betw

12006–2006
Whirlpool Corp. v. Civil Rights Commission green
mich · 1986
2 sentences

1999As noted in Justice Archer’s dissent in Whirlpool Corp v Civil Rights Comm, 425 Mich 527 ; 390 NW2d 625 (1986), “ ‘Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor [sic] essential to determination of the case in hand, are, however inuminating, but obiter dicta and lack the force of adjudication.’ ” Id., 539 , quoting Hett v Duffy, 346 Mich 456, 461 ; 78 NW2d 284 (1956).

1999As noted in Justice Archer’s dissent in Whirlpool Corp v Civil Rights Comm, 425 Mich 527 ; 390 NW2d 625 (1986), “ ‘Statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor [sic] essential to determination of the case in hand, are, however inuminating, but obiter dicta and lack the force of adjudication.’ ” Id., 539 , quoting Hett v Duffy, 346 Mich 456, 461 ; 78 NW2d 284 (1956).

11999–1999
Smith v. City of Detroit Swarthout green
mich · 1972
2 sentences

1999See also Breckon v Franklin Fuel Co, 383 Mich 251, 267 ; 174 NW2d 836 (1970), overruled on other grounds Smith v Detroit, 388 Mich 637 ; 202 NW2d 300 (1972).

1999See also Breckon v Franklin Fuel Co, 383 Mich 251, 267 ; 174 NW2d 836 (1970), overruled on other grounds Smith v Detroit, 388 Mich 637 ; 202 NW2d 300 (1972).

11999–1999
Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. green
scotus · 1974
2 sentences

1999Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36, 51-52 , 94 S.Ct. 1011 , 39 L.Ed.2d 147 (1974). [1] The majority opinion observes that "a plaintiff is always free to file suit against any or all tortfeasors." Op. at 580.

1999Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36, 51-52 , 94 S.Ct. 1011 , 39 L.Ed.2d 147 (1974). [1] The majority opinion observes that "a plaintiff is always free to file suit against any or all tortfeasors." Op. at 580.

11999–1999
Clink v. Steiner green
michctapp · 1987
2 sentences

1994Clink v Steiner, 162 Mich App 551, 556 ; 413 NW2d 45 (1987). [6] Any statements in an opinion concerning some rule of law or debated legal proposition not necessarily involved or essential to determination of the case are obiter dicta and lack the force of an adjudication.

1994Clink v Steiner, 162 Mich App 551, 556 ; 413 NW2d 45 (1987). [6] Any statements in an opinion concerning some rule of law or debated legal proposition not necessarily involved or essential to determination of the case are obiter dicta and lack the force of an adjudication.

11994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2101 (4) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 769.12 (4) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.316 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MI 26 (1956–2025) GA 15 (1994–2026) CT 6 (2004–2019) AR 5 (2000–2017) NC 3 (1994–2026) MN 3 (1960–2024) AZ 3 (2023–2024) WA 2 (2000–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check