plain or obvious error (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

plain or obvious error in Michigan

26 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2023 11 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Carinesgreen
mich · 1999 · cited in 14 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2016–2022
2 sentences

2022See id.

2019In other words, defendant must show that the plain or obvious error “affected the outcome of the lower court proceedings.” Id.

514
In re Beersgreen
michctapp · 2018 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022See id. -3- The Department must normally make reasonable efforts to “reunify the child and family.” MCL 712A.19a(2).

2022See id.

22
People of Michigan v. Anthony Ray McFarlane Jrgreen
michctapp · 2018 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See McFarlane, 325 Mich App at 517-518 .

11
People v. Lukitygreen
mich · 1999 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018See Carines, 460 Mich at 763 . -9- C.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Kimble green
mich · 2004
2 sentences

2018Kimble, 470 Mich at 312 .2 In order to warrant relief, the defendant must show that the trial court committed a plain or obvious error and that the error affected the outcome.

2018Kimble, 470 Mich at 312 .2 In order to warrant relief, the defendant must show that the trial court committed a plain or obvious error and that the error affected the outcome.

22018–2018
People v. Lockridge green
mich · 2015
2 sentences

2017Id. at 392-393 .

2017Id. at 392-393 .

22017–2017
In Re Toler green
michctapp · 1992
2 sentences

2023Id. “[A] respondent can consent to termination of his parental rights under the juvenile code, in which case the judge need not announce a statutory basis for it.” In re Toler, 193 Mich App 474, 477 ; 484 NW2d 672 (1992).

2023Id. “[A] respondent can consent to termination of his parental rights under the juvenile code, in which case the judge need not announce a statutory basis for it.” In re Toler, 193 Mich App 474, 477 ; 484 NW2d 672 (1992).

12023–2023
Kimberly Marie Marik v. Peter Brian Marik green
michctapp · 2018
1 sentence

2022Marik, 325 Mich App at 359 .

12022–2022
People of Michigan v. William Lawrence Rucker green
michctapp · 2018
1 sentence

2021Wiley, 324 Mich App at 150-151 .

12021–2021
People v. Shafier green
mich · 2009
2 sentences

2019People v Shafier, 483 Mich 205, 219-220 ; 768 NW2d 305 (2009).

2019People v Shafier, 483 Mich 205, 219-220 ; 768 NW2d 305 (2009).

12019–2019
People v. Sardy green
michctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2016People v Sardy, 313 Mich App 679, 708 ; 884 NW2d 808 (2015), citing People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 763 ; 597 NW2d 130 (1999).

2016People v Sardy, 313 Mich App 679, 708 ; 884 NW2d 808 (2015), citing People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 763 ; 597 NW2d 130 (1999).

12016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.227b (7) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 769.12 (7) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.110a (5) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.224f (5) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.529 (5) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 769.34 (5) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.227 (4) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.316 (4) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520b (4) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.83 (4) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.19b (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.157a (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 98 (2008–2026) MI 26 (2016–2023) OK 17 (2015–2023) IL 9 (2018–2026) MT 6 (2024–2026) ND 2 (2017–2025) MS 2 (1996–1999) ID 2 (2012–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check