judgment must assign error in Texas

1998Johnson v. Coggeshall, 578 S.W.2d 556, 560 (Tex.Civ.App.1979, no writ) (where a judgment may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no complaint is made.

1998Johnson v. Coggeshall, 578 S.W.2d 556, 560 (Tex.Civ.App.1979, no writ) (where a judgment may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no *261 complaint is made.

2010Id. at 424; Secure Comm, Inc. v. Anderson , 31 S.W.3d 428, 430-31 (Tex. App.--Austin 2000, no pet.) ("Where a judgment may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no complaint is made.

2010Id. at 424; Secure Comm, Inc. v. Anderson, 31 S.W.3d 428, 430-31 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000, no pet.) (“Where a judgment may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no complaint is made.

2012Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 787 S.W.2d 183, 184 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ) (“Where a judgment may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the trial court’s judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.”); see also Strather v. Dolgencorp of Tex., Inc., 96 S.W.3d 420 , 422–23 (Tex. App.— Texarkana 2002, no pet.) (when a trial court does not specify on what grounds it granted summary judgment, an appellant must argue that every ground in the summary judgment motion is erroneous).

2011Fox v. Maguire, 224 S.W.3d 304, 307 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2005, pet. denied) (applying this rule in a case involving a plea to the jurisdiction); Inscore v. Karnes County Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 787 S.W.2d 183, 184 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1990, no writ) (“Where a judgment *847 may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the trial court’s judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.

2011Fox v. Maguire, 224 S.W.3d 304, 307 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2005, pet. denied) (applying this rule in a case involving a plea to the jurisdiction); Inscore v. Karnes County Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 787 S.W.2d 183, 184 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1990, no writ) (“Where a judgment *847 may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the trial court’s judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.

2011Fox v. Maguire, 224 S.W.3d 304, 307 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, pet. denied) (applying this rule in a case involving a plea to the jurisdiction); Inscore v. Karnes County Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 787 S.W.2d 183, 184 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ) (―Where a judgment may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the trial court’s judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.

2009See, e.g. , Rudisell v. Paquette , 89 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.) (citing Thomas v. Thomas , 917 S.W.2d 425, 432 (Tex. App.--Waco 1996, no writ); Friedman & Assocs., P.C. v. Beltline Rd., Ltd. , 861 S.W.2d 1, 2-3 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1993, writ dism'd by agr.); GTE Commc'ns Sys.

2009Riley does not challenge this alternative ground that could support the judgment.2 Because Riley has waived any complaint with this ground for the judgment, we affirm.3 See, e.g., Texas Dep’t of Human Res. v. Orr, 730 S.W.2d 435, 436 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, no writ) (“Should a judgment rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error as to each such ground or risk having the judgment affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.”); see also In Re Hansen, No. 05-06-00585-CV, 2007 1 See, e.g., Rudisell v. Paquette, 89 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. App.—Corpu

2009See, e.g. , Rudisell v. Paquette , 89 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.) (citing Thomas v. Thomas , 917 S.W.2d 425, 432 (Tex. App.--Waco 1996, no writ); Friedman & Assocs., P.C. v. Beltline Rd., Ltd. , 861 S.W.2d 1, 2-3 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1993, writ dism'd by agr.); GTE Commc'ns Sys.

2009Riley does not challenge this alternative ground that could support the judgment.2 Because Riley has waived any complaint with this ground for the judgment, we affirm.3 See, e.g., Texas Dep’t of Human Res. v. Orr, 730 S.W.2d 435, 436 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, no writ) (“Should a judgment rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error as to each such ground or risk having the judgment affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.”); see also In Re Hansen, No. 05-06-00585-CV, 2007 1 See, e.g., Rudisell v. Paquette, 89 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. App.—Corpu

2009See, e.g. , Rudisell v. Paquette , 89 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.) (citing Thomas v. Thomas , 917 S.W.2d 425, 432 (Tex. App.--Waco 1996, no writ); Friedman & Assocs., P.C. v. Beltline Rd., Ltd. , 861 S.W.2d 1, 2-3 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1993, writ dism'd by agr.); GTE Commc'ns Sys.

2009Riley does not challenge this alternative ground that could support the judgment.2 Because Riley has waived any complaint with this ground for the judgment, we affirm.3 See, e.g., Texas Dep’t of Human Res. v. Orr, 730 S.W.2d 435, 436 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, no writ) (“Should a judgment rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error as to each such ground or risk having the judgment affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.”); see also In Re Hansen, No. 05-06-00585-CV, 2007 1 See, e.g., Rudisell v. Paquette, 89 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. App.—Corpu

2009Riley does not challenge this alternative ground that could support the judgment. (2) Because Riley has waived any complaint with this ground for the judgment, we affirm. (3) See, e.g ., Texas Dep't of Human Res. v. Orr , 730 S.W.2d 435, 436 (Tex. App.--Austin 1987, no writ) ("Should a judgment rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error as to each such ground or risk having the judgment affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned."); see also In Re Hansen , No. 05-06-00585-CV, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 2115 , at *1-3 (Tex. App.--Dallas Mar. 20, 2

2009Riley does not challenge this alternative ground that could support the judgment.2 Because Riley has waived any complaint with this ground for the judgment, we affirm.3 See, e.g., Texas Dep’t of Human Res. v. Orr, 730 S.W.2d 435, 436 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, no writ) (“Should a judgment rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error as to each such ground or risk having the judgment affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.”); see also In Re Hansen, No. 05-06-00585-CV, 2007 1 See, e.g., Rudisell v. Paquette, 89 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. App.—Corpu

2012Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 787 S.W.2d 183, 184 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ) (“Where a judgment may rest upon more than one ground, the party aggrieved by the judgment must assign error to each ground or the trial court’s judgment will be affirmed on the ground to which no error was assigned.”); see also Strather v. Dolgencorp of Tex., Inc., 96 S.W.3d 420 , 422–23 (Tex. App.— Texarkana 2002, no pet.) (when a trial court does not specify on what grounds it granted summary judgment, an appellant must argue that every ground in the summary judgment motion is erroneous).

2009Corp. v. Curry, 819 S.W.2d 652, 654 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1991) (orig. proc.)); Murphy v. Friendswood Dev.

2006Fields v. City of Tex. City , 864 S.W.2d 66, 68 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, pet. denied).

2002Midway National Bank of Grand Prairie, Texas v. West Texas Wholesale Supply Co., 453 S.W.2d 460 (Tex.1970); McKelvy v. Barber , 381 S.W.2d 59 (Tex.1964)." Ellebracht v. Ellebracht, 735 S.W.2d 658, 663 (Tex. App.--Austin 1987, no writ).

2002Kelly v. Klein , 827 S.W.2d 609, 611 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no writ).

1994Johnson , 578 S.W.2d at 560 ; Nesmith , 522 S.W.2d at 606 ; see Guynn v. Corpus Christi Bank & Trust , 589 S.W.2d 764, 770 (Tex. Civ.

1993Bailey v. Rogers, 631 S.W.2d 784, 786 (Tex.App.—Austin 1982, no writ).

1988Prudential Insurance Co. v. Franclen, Inc., 710 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex.1986); Gulf Consolidated Intern., Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex.1983).

1988Prudential Insurance Co. v. Franclen, Inc., 710 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex.1986); Gulf Consolidated Intern., Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex.1983).