Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1946–2022 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Rachelgreen2 sentences2018App. 3d 600 , 606, 78 Ill.Dec. 840 , 462 N.E.2d 959 (1984) ("It is axiomatic that a defendant cannot complain of error in instructions to which he has acquiesced, induced or invited or which were given at his request * * *."). ¶ 46 Even if we set aside defendant's acquiescence, we find the court's issuance of IPI Criminal No. 3.12 was harmless error. 2018App. 3d 600 , 606, 78 Ill.Dec. 840 , 462 N.E.2d 959 (1984) ("It is axiomatic that a defendant cannot complain of error in instructions to which he has acquiesced, induced or invited or which were given at his request * * *."). ¶ 46 Even if we set aside defendant's acquiescence, we find the court's issuance of IPI Criminal No. 3.12 was harmless error. | 3 | 5 |
People v. Montesgreen2 sentences2022“Under the invited- error doctrine, a defendant cannot complain of error that he or she induced the trial court to make, or to which he or she consented.” People v. Montes, 2020 IL App (2d) 180565, ¶ 45 . 2022Here, where defendant seeks reversal based on his inaction, we cannot allow defendant to benefit from failing to object or offer a limiting instruction. ¶ 43 We note further, “[u]nder the invited-error doctrine, a defendant cannot complain of error that he or she induced the trial court to make, or to which he or she consented.” People v. Montes, 2020 IL App (2d) 180565, ¶ 45 . | 1 | 4 |
People v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2019“An error in a jury instruction is harmless if it is demonstrated that the result of the trial would not have been different if the proper instruction had been given.” People v. Johnson, 146 Ill. 2d 109, 137 (1991). ¶ 47 Here, the evidence at trial was heavily weighted against defendant. 2018"An error in a jury instruction is harmless if it is demonstrated that the result of the trial would not have been different if the proper instruction had been given." People v. Johnson , 146 Ill. 2d 109 , 137, 165 Ill.Dec. 682 , 585 N.E.2d 78 (1991). ¶ 47 Here, the evidence at trial was heavily weighted against defendant. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Bishopgreen1 sentence2022See People v. Montes, 2020 IL App (2d) 180565, ¶ 45 (“Under the invited error doctrine, a defendant cannot complain of error that he or she induced the trial court to make, or to which he or she consented.”). ¶ 60 In sum, even if Alexander’s minimal reference to defendant as the target of the search warrant was error, the alleged error was not of such gravity that it “infected the fundamental fairness of the trial, such that the continuation of the proceeding would defeat the ends of justice.” - 19 - No. 1-18-1664 Bishop, 218 Ill. 2d at 251 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Browngreen1 sentence2013People v. Brown, 172 Ill. 2d 1, 43 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
The People v. Myersgreen2 sentences1990See People v. Myers (1966), 35 Ill. 2d 311 , 220 N.E.2d 297 ; People v. Hicks (1981), 101 Ill. 1990See People v. Myers (1966), 35 Ill. 2d 311 , 220 N.E.2d 297 ; People v. Hicks (1981), 101 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Lawrence
green
2 sentences2020People v. Lawrence, 2018 IL App (1st) 161267, ¶ 52 . 2020People v. Lawrence, 2018 IL App (1st) 161267, ¶ 52 . | 2 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Benka
green
2 sentences1985People v. Benka (1983), 117 Ill. 1985(People v. Burage (1961), 23 Ill. 2d 280, 283 , 178 N.E.2d 389, 391 ; People v. Benka (1983), 117 Ill. | 2 | 1985–1985 |
People v. Hicks
green
1 sentence1990See People v. Myers (1966), 35 Ill. 2d 311 , 220 N.E.2d 297 ; People v. Hicks (1981), 101 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Davis
green
1 sentence1986(People v. Davis (1985), 140 Ill. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
The People v. Burage
green
2 sentences1985(People v. Burage (1961), 23 Ill. 2d 280, 283 , 178 N.E.2d 389, 391 ; People v. Benka (1983), 117 Ill. 1985(People v. Burage (1961), 23 Ill. 2d 280, 283 , 178 N.E.2d 389, 391 ; People v. Benka (1983), 117 Ill. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
The People v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1984The court there noted that the absence of instructions concerning lesser included offenses may well work to the benefit of the accused, and so a defendant cannot complain of error where no such instruction was requested. ( 36 Ill. 2d 483, 490-91 , 224 N.E.2d 266 .) Further, we believe that the instructions now suggested by defendant would have been inappropriate. 1984The court there noted that the absence of instructions concerning lesser included offenses may well work to the benefit of the accused, and so a defendant cannot complain of error where no such instruction was requested. ( 36 Ill. 2d 483, 490-91 , 224 N.E.2d 266 .) Further, we believe that the instructions now suggested by defendant would have been inappropriate. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
People v. Gallardo
green
1 sentence1984(People v. Gallardo (1983), 112 Ill. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
People v. Harris
green
1 sentence1983People v. Harris (1982), 104 Ill. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People v. Pierce
green
1 sentence1983(See People v. Pierce (1974), 56 Ill. 2d 361, 364 .) Third, the defendant also points to the court’s incorrect statement that the prints were found on “the inside face of the cash register.” The correct response would have been that the prints were found on the “face of the cash register drawer front.” The defendant argues the statement of the trial judge influenced the conclusion of the jury and prejudiced the defendant because the statement suggests the defendant tampered with the cash register. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
The PEOPLE v. Riley
green
2 sentences1979People v. Riley (1964), 31 Ill. 2d 490 , 202 N.E.2d 531 . 1979People v. Riley (1964), 31 Ill. 2d 490 , 202 N.E.2d 531 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
The People v. Booker
green
1 sentence1946(People v. Booker, 378 Ill. 334 .) It is also the law that a defendant cannot complain of error in an instruction when his own instructions in substance contain the same error. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.