Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Piatek v. Pulaski Townshipgreen2 sentences2025As the TRB was the sole finder of fact and weigher of 4 “In evaluating the decision of an agency, where a complete record is made before that agency, our standard of review is whether the agency committed an error of law and whether the material findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence.” Piatek v. Pulaski Twp., 828 A.2d 1164, 1170 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003) (internal citations and quotations omitted). 7 credibility, the City asserts that this credibility determination may not be second guessed on appeal. 2018While Appellant asserts a constitutional violation based on discrimination, she presents no facts and proferred no evidence to support such an allegation. 2 “In evaluating the decision of an agency, where a complete record is made before that agency, our standard of review is whether the agency committed an error of law and whether the material findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence.” Piatek v. Pulaski Township, 828 A.2d 1164, 1170 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003). | 6 | 8 |
SSEN, Inc. v. Borough Council of Eddystonegreen2 sentences2008Section 754 of the Local Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. § 754; SSEN, Inc. v. Borough Council of the Borough of Eddystone, 810 A.2d 200, 206 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2002). 2008Section 754 of the Local Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. § 754; SSEN, Inc. v. Borough Council of the Borough of Eddystone, 810 A.2d 200, 206 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2002). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
R.J.W. v. Department of Human Services
green
2 sentences2019R.J.W. v. Dep’t of Human Servs., 139 A.3d 270 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016). 10 order as the order over which this Court has jurisdiction. 2019R.J.W. v. Dep’t of Human Servs., 139 A.3d 270 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016). 10 order as the order over which this Court has jurisdiction. | 4 | 2018–2019 |
Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement Board
green
2 sentences1994Our scope of review therefore is limited to determining whether the agency's findings are supported by substantial evidence, whether the agency committed an error of law, whether the procedural provisions of the Administrative Agency Law have been complied with, or whether any of Realmuto’s constitutional rights have been violated. 2 Pa.C.S. § 704; Estate of McGovern v. State Employe’s Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). 1994Our scope of review therefore is limited to determining whether the agency's findings are supported by substantial evidence, whether the agency committed an error of law, whether the procedural provisions of the Administrative Agency Law have been complied with, or whether any of Realmuto’s constitutional rights have been violated. 2 Pa.C.S. § 704; Estate of McGovern v. State Employe’s Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). | 2 | 1987–1994 |
Chuk v. State Employees' Retirement System
green
1 sentence2015When reviewing an agency adjudication, we determine whether the agency committed an error of law or violated the petitioner’s constitutional rights and whether the agency's findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. 2 Pa.C.S. § 704; Chuk v. State Employees’ Retirement System, 885 A.2d 605 , 608 n. 9 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Realmuto v. Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences2014Our review of an order issued by the Secretary of the Department is limited to determining whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence, whether the agency committed an error of law, whether the procedural provisions of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. §§ 501-508, 701-704, have been complied with, or whether any of the petitioner’s constitutional rights have been violated. 2 Pa.C.S. § 704; Realmuto v. Department of Transportation, 161 Pa.Cmwlth. 613 , 637 A.2d 769 , 770 n. 1 (1994). 2014Our review of an order issued by the Secretary of the Department is limited to determining whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence, whether the agency committed an error of law, whether the procedural provisions of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. §§ 501-508, 701-704, have been complied with, or whether any of the petitioner’s constitutional rights have been violated. 2 Pa.C.S. § 704; Realmuto v. Department of Transportation, 161 Pa.Cmwlth. 613 , 637 A.2d 769 , 770 n. 1 (1994). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Cardiac Science, Inc. v. Department of General Services
green
1 sentence2011Cardiac Science v. Department of General Services, 808 A.2d 1029 , 1033 n. 3 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). 3 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
In Re Sb
green
1 sentence2006Caln Nether v. Bd. of Supervisors of Thombury Twp., 840 A.2d 484 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002), pet. for allowance of appeal denied, 579 Pa. 694 , 856 A.2d 835 (2004). 6 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Caln Nether Co., L.P. v. Board of Supervisors
green
1 sentence2006Caln Nether v. Bd. of Supervisors of Thombury Twp., 840 A.2d 484 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002), pet. for allowance of appeal denied, 579 Pa. 694 , 856 A.2d 835 (2004). 6 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Pennsylvania State Police v. Klimek
green
1 sentence2005Piatek v. Pulaski Township, 828 A.2d 1164 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 579 Pa. 706 , 857 A.2d 681 (2004). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers v. Prevailing Wage Appeals Board
neutral
1 sentence2002Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. § 704; Int’l Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers, Local 5, v. Prevailing Wage Appeals Bd., 778 A.2d 1264 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001). 4 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Brandt v. Pennsylvania State Police
neutral
2 sentences1999Brandt v. Pennsylvania State Police, 159 Pa.Cmwlth. 66 , 632 A.2d 986 (1993), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 537 Pa. 668 , 644 A.2d 1204 (1994). 5 . 1999Brandt v. Pennsylvania State Police, 159 Pa.Cmwlth. 66 , 632 A.2d 986 (1993), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 537 Pa. 668 , 644 A.2d 1204 (1994). 5 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.