nonresident is a one-step analysis (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

nonresident is a one-step analysis in Louisiana

22 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Superior Supply v. Assoc. Pipe & Supplygreen
la · 1987 · cited in 7 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–2021
2 sentences

2021“Thus the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements.” Id. (citing Superior Supply Company v. Associated Pipe and Supply Company, 515 So. 2d 790 (La. 1987)).

2008"Now, under the express terms of the present long-arm statute, the sole inquiry into jurisdiction *506 over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements." Id.

37
Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp.green
la · 1987 · cited in 9 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1987–2021
2 sentences

2021“Thus the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements.” Id. (citing Superior Supply Company v. Associated Pipe and Supply Company, 515 So. 2d 790 (La. 1987)).

2003"Now, under the express wording of the present Long-arm Statute, the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements." Id. 731 So.2d at 885 .

29

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. green
la · 1999
2 sentences

2003"Now, under the express wording of the present Long-arm Statute, the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements." Id. 731 So.2d at 885 .

2001Thus, under current Louisiana law, "the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements." Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 , cert. denied, Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Ruckstuhl, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct. 526 , 145 L.Ed.2d 407 (1999), quoting Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 513 So.2d 1188 (La.1987).

82000–2005
International Shoe Co. v. Washington green
scotus · 1945
2 sentences

2021Based upon the facts and circumstances of the present case and for the foregoing reasons we do not find that Louisiana has personal jurisdiction over Ms. Vergara pursuant to either general or specific jurisdiction as contemplated by the long-arm statute. 80 Pursuant to the seminal personal jurisdiction case, International Shoe Co. v. Washington, the United States Supreme Court explained that a state court may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has “certain minimum contacts with [the State] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions

2021Based upon the facts and circumstances of the present case and for the foregoing reasons we do not find that Louisiana has personal jurisdiction over Ms. Vergara pursuant to either general or specific jurisdiction as contemplated by the long-arm statute. 80 Pursuant to the seminal personal jurisdiction case, International Shoe Co. v. Washington, the United States Supreme Court explained that a state court may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has “certain minimum contacts with [the State] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions

52000–2021
A & L ENERGY, INC. v. Pegasus Group green
la · 2001
2 sentences

2004The limits of the Louisiana long-arm statute are co-extensive with the limits of constitutional due process, A & L Energy, *908 Inc. v. Pegasus Group, 00-3255, p. 3 (La.6/29/01), 791 So.2d 1266, 1270 , and the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements.

2004"Thus, the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements." A & L Energy, Inc., 00-3255 at 4, 791 So.2d at 1270 .

52002–2011
Lewis County v. United States green
scotus · 1999
2 sentences

2001Thus, under current Louisiana law, "the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements." Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 , cert. denied, Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Ruckstuhl, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct. 526 , 145 L.Ed.2d 407 (1999), quoting Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 513 So.2d 1188 (La.1987).

2000Thus, under current Louisiana law, “the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements.” Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 , cert. denied, Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Ruckstuhl, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct. 526 , 145 L.Ed.2d 407 (1999), quoting Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 513 So.2d 1188 (La.1987).

42000–2005
Bogan v. Hodgkins green
scotus · 1999
2 sentences

2001Thus, under current Louisiana law, "the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements." Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 , cert. denied, Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Ruckstuhl, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct. 526 , 145 L.Ed.2d 407 (1999), quoting Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 513 So.2d 1188 (La.1987).

2000Thus, under current Louisiana law, “the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements.” Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 , cert. denied, Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Ruckstuhl, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct. 526 , 145 L.Ed.2d 407 (1999), quoting Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 513 So.2d 1188 (La.1987).

42000–2005
State v. Mittle green
sc · 1922
2 sentences

2001Thus, under current Louisiana law, "the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements." Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 , cert. denied, Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Ruckstuhl, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct. 526 , 145 L.Ed.2d 407 (1999), quoting Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 513 So.2d 1188 (La.1987).

2000Thus, under current Louisiana law, “the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements.” Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 , cert. denied, Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Ruckstuhl, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct. 526 , 145 L.Ed.2d 407 (1999), quoting Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 513 So.2d 1188 (La.1987).

42000–2005
Frederic v. Zodiac Development green
lactapp · 2003
1 sentence

2016Frederic, 839 So.2d at 452 .

12016–2016
Spomer v. Aggressor International, Inc. neutral
la · 2002
1 sentence

2002Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 ; Spomer v. Aggressor Int'l, Inc., 00-1646 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/28/01) 807 So.2d 267, 271 , writ denied, 01-2886 (La.1/25/02), 807 So.2d 250 .

12002–2002
Spomer v. Aggressor Intern., Inc. neutral
lactapp · 2001
1 sentence

2002Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), 731 So.2d 881, 885 ; Spomer v. Aggressor Int'l, Inc., 00-1646 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/28/01) 807 So.2d 267, 271 , writ denied, 01-2886 (La.1/25/02), 807 So.2d 250 .

12002–2002

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3201 (20) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check