Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2026 12 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coleman v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2026See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 725 (1991) (holding that “a petitioner cannot claim constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in such proceedings”); Murphy, 156 Idaho at 395 , 327 P.3d at 371 (holding that “where there is no right to counsel, there can be no deprivation of effective assistance of counsel” and thus Murphy failed to demonstrate “sufficient reason” for filing a successive petition based on ineffectiveness of post-conviction counsel). 4. 2026See Coleman, 501 U.S. at 725 (holding that “a petitioner cannot claim constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in such proceedings”); Murphy, 156 Idaho at 395 , 327 P.3d at 371 (holding that “where there is no right to counsel, there can be no deprivation of effective assistance of counsel” and thus Murphy failed to demonstrate “sufficient reason” for filing a successive petition based on ineffectiveness of post-conviction counsel). | 7 | 8 |
Alisha Ann Murphy v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 725 (1991) (holding that “a petitioner cannot claim constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in such proceedings”); Murphy, 156 Idaho at 395 , 327 P.3d at 371 (holding that “where there is no right to counsel, there can be no deprivation of effective assistance of counsel” and thus Murphy failed to demonstrate “sufficient reason” for filing a successive petition based on ineffectiveness of post-conviction counsel). 4. 2026See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 725 (1991) (holding that “a petitioner cannot claim constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in such proceedings”); Murphy, 156 Idaho at 395 , 327 P.3d at 371 (holding that “where there is no right to counsel, there can be no deprivation of effective assistance of counsel” and thus Murphy failed to demonstrate “sufficient reason” for filing a successive petition based on ineffectiveness of post-conviction counsel). 4. | 1 | 3 |
Follinus v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Follinus v. State, 127 Idaho 897, 902 , 908 P.2d 590, 595 (Ct. App. 1995); see also Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 752 (1991). 2016Follinus v. State, 127 Idaho 897, 902 , 908 P.2d 590, 595 (Ct. App. 1995); see also Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 752 (1991). | 1 | 2 |
Trevino v. Thalergreen2 sentences2017In Trevino v. Thaler, the Court extended its holding in Martinez to include states where the “procedural framework, by-reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal.” 13 569 U.S. 413, 416 , 133 S.Ct. 1911, 1921 , 185 L.Ed.2d 1044, 1056-57 (2013). 2017In Trevino v. Thaler, the Court extended its holding in Martinez to include states where the “procedural framework, by-reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal.” 13 569 U.S. 413, 416 , 133 S.Ct. 1911, 1921 , 185 L.Ed.2d 1044, 1056-57 (2013). | 1 | 1 |
Lee v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Consequently, a petitioner cannot claim constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in such proceedings.” Lee v. State, 122 Idaho 196, 199 , 832 P.2d 1131, 1134 (1992) (quoting Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 752 , 111 S.Ct. 2546, 2566 , 115 L.Ed.2d 640, 671 (1991)). 2010Consequently, a petitioner cannot claim constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in such proceedings.” Lee v. State, 122 Idaho 196, 199 , 832 P.2d 1131, 1134 (1992) (quoting Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 752 , 111 S.Ct. 2546, 2566 , 115 L.Ed.2d 640, 671 (1991)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeRushé v. State
green
2 sentences2025DeRushé, 146 Idaho at 602, 200 P.3d at 1151 . 2024DeRushé, 146 Idaho at 602, 200 P.3d at 1151 . | 10 | 2020–2025 |
Kelly v. State
green
2 sentences2022Kelly, 149 Idaho at 524 , 236 P.3d at 1284 . 2022Kelly, 149 Idaho at 524 , 236 P.3d at 1284 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Martinez v. Ryan
green
2 sentences2017In reaching this holding, we relied on the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Coleman v. Thompson, which held that “[t]here is no constitutional right to an attorney in state post-conviction proceedings” and therefore “a petitioner cannot claim constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in such proceedings.” 501 U.S. 722, 752 , 111 S.Ct. 2546, 2566 , 115 L.Ed.2d 640, 670-71 (1991). *228 In Martinez , the U.S, Supreme Court announced a “narrow exception” to Coleman: Where, under state law, claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel must be raised in an initial-review collateral proce 2017In reaching this holding, we relied on the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Coleman v. Thompson, which held that “[t]here is no constitutional right to an attorney in state post-conviction proceedings” and therefore “a petitioner cannot claim constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in such proceedings.” 501 U.S. 722, 752 , 111 S.Ct. 2546, 2566 , 115 L.Ed.2d 640, 670-71 (1991). *228 In Martinez , the U.S, Supreme Court announced a “narrow exception” to Coleman: Where, under state law, claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel must be raised in an initial-review collateral proce | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.