Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bishop Carroll High School v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2026Roberts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 977 A.2d 12, 16 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); Bishop Carroll High School v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 557 A.2d 1141, 1143 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989). 2026Roberts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 977 A.2d 12, 16 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); Bishop Carroll High School v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 557 A.2d 1141, 1143 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989). | 4 | 4 |
Roberts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen2 sentences2026Roberts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 977 A.2d 12, 16 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); Bishop Carroll High School v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 557 A.2d 1141, 1143 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989). 2026Roberts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 977 A.2d 12, 16 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); Bishop Carroll High School v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 557 A.2d 1141, 1143 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989). | 3 | 4 |
ATM Corp. of America v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen2 sentences2015If a claimant is discharged for violating a work rule, the employer bears the initial burden of showing “the existence of a work rule and that the claimant violated the rule.” ATM Corporation of America v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 892 A.2d 859, 865 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006). 2015Board Adjudication at 2; Findings of Fact No. 13-14. 7 work rule and that the claimant violated the rule.” ATM Corporation of America v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 892 A.2d 859, 865 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006). | 3 | 4 |
Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen2 sentences2017Id. 2017Id. | 1 | 7 |
Grieb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen1 sentence2026Grieb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 827 A.2d 422, 425 (Pa. 2003). 7 Where the claimant is discharged for a work rule violation, the employer has the burden to show that the claimant was aware that the work rule existed and that the claimant violated the rule. | 1 | 1 |
Melomed v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen1 sentence2023Roberts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 977 A.2d 12, 16 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); Melomed v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 972 A.2d 593, 594 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); Williams v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 926 A.2d 568 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007). | 1 | 1 |
Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen2 sentences2006Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 550 Pa. 115, 123 , 703 A.2d 452, 456 (1997). 2006Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 550 Pa. 115, 123 , 703 A.2d 452, 456 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
1 sentence2023Roberts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 977 A.2d 12, 16 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); Melomed v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 972 A.2d 593, 594 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); Williams v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 926 A.2d 568 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
1 sentence2016Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 814 A.2d 1286 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Walsh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 369 . 2009Id. at 369 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Duquesne v. Unemploy. Comp. Bd.
green
2 sentences1997Duquesne Light Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 167 Pa.Cmwlth. 650 , 648 A.2d 1318 (1994). 4 An employer alleging that a claimant has en gaged in willful misconduct by violating its rules or policy bears the initial burden of proving the existence of a reasonable rule or policy and the fact that the claimant violated that rule or policy. 1997Duquesne Light Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 167 Pa.Cmwlth. 650 , 648 A.2d 1318 (1994). 4 An employer alleging that a claimant has en gaged in willful misconduct by violating its rules or policy bears the initial burden of proving the existence of a reasonable rule or policy and the fact that the claimant violated that rule or policy. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Frigm v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences1997Frigm v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 164 Pa.Cmwlth. 282 , 642 A.2d 629 (1994); United Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 661 A.2d 520 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 543 Pa. 721 , 672 A.2d 312 (1995). 1997Frigm v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 164 Pa.Cmwlth. 282 , 642 A.2d 629 (1994); United Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 661 A.2d 520 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 543 Pa. 721 , 672 A.2d 312 (1995). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
United Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
1 sentence1997Frigm v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 164 Pa.Cmwlth. 282 , 642 A.2d 629 (1994); United Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 661 A.2d 520 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 543 Pa. 721 , 672 A.2d 312 (1995). | 1 | 1997–1997 |