opinion that no reversible error (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

opinion that no reversible error in Florida

20 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1917–1977 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
McDonald v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 1975 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
2 sentences

1977See McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

1977See McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

22
Farrington v. Harrisongreen
fla · 1928 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1938–1938
2 sentences

1938See Farrington v. Harrison, 95 Fla. 769 , 116 So. 497 .

1938See Farrington v. Harrison, 95 Fla. 769 , 116 So. 497 .

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (30)

CaseCitedYears
Scott v. Kirtley green
fla · 1933
2 sentences

1958In holding that the attorneys were entitled to a lien on the property, the court stated: "(1) We are of the opinion that no reversible error has been shown and that the decree of the chancellor here appealed from must be affirmed upon the authority of the case of Scott v. Kirtley, 113 Fla. 637 , 152 So. 721, 722 , 93 A.L.R. 661 , which case settled in favor of the appellees the controlling question raised by this appeal. * *" The decision in the Knabb case was based upon the decision of the court, Scott v. Kirtley, supra. Both of these cases come under the heading of special agreement cases an

1958In holding that the attorneys were entitled to a lien on the property, the court stated: "(1) We are of the opinion that no reversible error has been shown and that the decree of the chancellor here appealed from must be affirmed upon the authority of the case of Scott v. Kirtley, 113 Fla. 637 , 152 So. 721, 722 , 93 A.L.R. 661 , which case settled in favor of the appellees the controlling question raised by this appeal. * *" The decision in the Knabb case was based upon the decision of the court, Scott v. Kirtley, supra. Both of these cases come under the heading of special agreement cases an

21939–1958
Roberts v. State green
fla · 1976
1 sentence

1977We have carefully considered and reject the retroactive application of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in Roberts v. State, 335 So.2d 285 (Fla.1976), adopting the so called “Lyles” rule.

11977–1977
Estevez v. State green
fladistctapp · 1974
1 sentence

1975Cf. Estevez v. State, Supreme Court of Florida, 290 So.2d 138 , opinion filed February 26, 1974.

11975–1975
O'SULLIVAN v. City of Deerfield Beach green
fladistctapp · 1970
1 sentence

1975Accordingly, the order under review is affirmed and the cause remanded to the trial court with the respectful direction to dismiss the proceedings in accordance with O’Sullivan v. City of Deerfield Beach, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 33 , and to award attorney fees and costs to the County as may be deemed appropriate.

11975–1975
Cantor v. Cantor green
fladistctapp · 1975
1 sentence

1975Cf. Lee v. Lee, Fla.App.1975, 309 So.2d 26 ; Cantor v. Cantor, Fla.App.1975, 306 So.2d 596 .

11975–1975
Ward v. Ochoa green
fla · 1973
1 sentence

1975We are satisfied that the limitation-of-liability agreement between defendant State Farm and plaintiff Asbury (appellees herein) did not exist prior to or during trial so as to be characterized as a "Mary Carter" agreement subject to discovery within the contemplation of Ward v. Ochoa, Fla. 1973, 284 So.2d 385 .

11975–1975
Lee v. Lee green
fladistctapp · 1975
1 sentence

1975Cf. Lee v. Lee, Fla.App.1975, 309 So.2d 26 ; Cantor v. Cantor, Fla.App.1975, 306 So.2d 596 .

11975–1975
Anderson v. Anderson green
fla · 1975
1 sentence

1975See 10A Fla.Jur., Dissolution of Marriage, sec. 43; and Anderson v. Anderson, 309 So.2d 1 , Supreme Court of Florida Case No. 45,217 opinion filed January 8, 1975.

11975–1975
Hollingshead v. Wainwright green
fla · 1967
1 sentence

1974Although this matter has proceeded for full appellate review by way of habeas corpus under the authority of Hollingshead v. Wainwright, Fla. 1967, 194 So.2d 577 , we are not convinced that the record demonstrates that petitioner's right to appeal was frustrated by state action.

11974–1974
Florida Power Corporation v. Smith green
fladistctapp · 1967
1 sentence

1974We have considered the action in light of the criteria found in Florida Power Corporation v. Smith, 202 So.2d 872 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1967), and are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to appear.

11974–1974
Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence green
fladistctapp · 1971
1 sentence

1973Spalding v. Von Zamft, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 208 ; Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 446 ; Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 480 ; James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Company, Fla.App. 1970, 238 So.2d 487 .

11973–1973
James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Company green
fladistctapp · 1970
1 sentence

1973Spalding v. Von Zamft, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 208 ; Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 446 ; Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 480 ; James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Company, Fla.App. 1970, 238 So.2d 487 .

11973–1973
Spalding v. Von Zamft green
fladistctapp · 1965
1 sentence

1973Spalding v. Von Zamft, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 208 ; Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 446 ; Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 480 ; James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Company, Fla.App. 1970, 238 So.2d 487 .

11973–1973
Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc. green
fladistctapp · 1966
1 sentence

1973Spalding v. Von Zamft, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 208 ; Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 446 ; Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 480 ; James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Company, Fla.App. 1970, 238 So.2d 487 .

11973–1973
City of Miami v. Thaw neutral
fladistctapp · 1961
1 sentence

1973City of Miami v. Thaw, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 902 ; Citizens Ins.

11973–1973
Stratos v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1964
1 sentence

1972Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863 ; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749 ; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 2073 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 ; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720 ; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723 ; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771 ; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572 .

11972–1972
Wade v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1965
1 sentence

1972Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863 ; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749 ; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 2073 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 ; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720 ; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723 ; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771 ; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572 .

11972–1972
Fisher v. State green
fladistctapp · 1970
1 sentence

1972Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863 ; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749 ; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 2073 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 ; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720 ; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723 ; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771 ; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572 .

11972–1972
Mitchell v. State green
fladistctapp · 1967
1 sentence

1972Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863 ; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749 ; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 2073 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 ; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720 ; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723 ; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771 ; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572 .

11972–1972
Fort v. California green
scotus · 1968
1 sentence

1972Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863 ; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749 ; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 2073 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 ; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720 ; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723 ; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771 ; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572 .

11972–1972
Mears v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1970
1 sentence

1972Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863 ; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749 ; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 2073 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 ; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720 ; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723 ; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771 ; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572 .

11972–1972
Rodeheaver v. State green
fladistctapp · 1969
1 sentence

1972Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863 ; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749 ; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 2073 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 ; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720 ; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723 ; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771 ; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572 .

11972–1972
Ghelfi v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1971
1 sentence

1972Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863 ; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749 ; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 2073 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 ; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720 ; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723 ; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771 ; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572 .

11972–1972
Ward v. Forde green
fla · 1944
2 sentences

1958The case of Ward v. Forde, 1944, 154 Fla. 383 , 17 So.2d 691, 695 , is strongly urged upon us by the plaintiff.

1958The case of Ward v. Forde, 1944, 154 Fla. 383 , 17 So.2d 691, 695 , is strongly urged upon us by the plaintiff.

11958–1958
Fleming v. State green
fla · 1932
1 sentence

1938Per Curiam. above entitled cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court after due consideration is *777 of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the order appealed from should be affirmed upon the authority of Section 26 of the 1931 Chancery Act and the following cases: Whitaker v. Wright, 100 Fla. 282 , 129 So. 889 ; Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp., et al., 98 Fla. 946 , 124 So. 719 ; Barry v. Walker, et al., 103 Fla. 533 , 137 So. 711 .

11938–1938
Barry v. Walker green
fla · 1931
1 sentence

1938Per Curiam. above entitled cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court after due consideration is *777 of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the order appealed from should be affirmed upon the authority of Section 26 of the 1931 Chancery Act and the following cases: Whitaker v. Wright, 100 Fla. 282 , 129 So. 889 ; Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp., et al., 98 Fla. 946 , 124 So. 719 ; Barry v. Walker, et al., 103 Fla. 533 , 137 So. 711 .

11938–1938
Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp. green
fla · 1929
2 sentences

1938Per Curiam. above entitled cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court after due consideration is *777 of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the order appealed from should be affirmed upon the authority of Section 26 of the 1931 Chancery Act and the following cases: Whitaker v. Wright, 100 Fla. 282 , 129 So. 889 ; Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp., et al., 98 Fla. 946 , 124 So. 719 ; Barry v. Walker, et al., 103 Fla. 533 , 137 So. 711 .

1938Per Curiam. above entitled cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court after due consideration is *777 of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the order appealed from should be affirmed upon the authority of Section 26 of the 1931 Chancery Act and the following cases: Whitaker v. Wright, 100 Fla. 282 , 129 So. 889 ; Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp., et al., 98 Fla. 946 , 124 So. 719 ; Barry v. Walker, et al., 103 Fla. 533 , 137 So. 711 .

11938–1938
Whitaker v. Wright green
fla · 1930
2 sentences

1938Per Curiam. above entitled cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court after due consideration is *777 of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the order appealed from should be affirmed upon the authority of Section 26 of the 1931 Chancery Act and the following cases: Whitaker v. Wright, 100 Fla. 282 , 129 So. 889 ; Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp., et al., 98 Fla. 946 , 124 So. 719 ; Barry v. Walker, et al., 103 Fla. 533 , 137 So. 711 .

1938Per Curiam. above entitled cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court after due consideration is *777 of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the order appealed from should be affirmed upon the authority of Section 26 of the 1931 Chancery Act and the following cases: Whitaker v. Wright, 100 Fla. 282 , 129 So. 889 ; Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp., et al., 98 Fla. 946 , 124 So. 719 ; Barry v. Walker, et al., 103 Fla. 533 , 137 So. 711 .

11938–1938
State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung green
fla · 1904
11933–1933
Lassiter v. State neutral
fla · 1912
11917–1917

Where else courts name it

FL 20 (1917–1977) TX 6 (1913–1976) TN 5 (1984–1989) MO 3 (1914–1943) ID 2 (1962–1963)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check