Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arvia v. Madigangreen2 sentences2025Arvia v. Madigan, 209 Ill. 2d 520, 526 (2004). ¶ 39 Only the third element is disputed by the parties on appeal. 2022Arvia v. Madigan, 209 Ill. 2d 520, 526 (2004). ¶ 37 a. | 13 | 13 |
Hudson v. City of Chicagogreen2 sentences2015Arvia v. Madigan, 209 Ill. 2d 520, 526 , 809 N.E.2d 88, 93 (2004). ¶ 23 " 'The doctrine of res judicata provides that a final judgment on the merits rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction bars any subsequent actions between the same parties or their privies on the same cause of action.' " Hudson v. City of Chicago, 228 Ill. 2d 462, 467 , 889 N.E.2d 210, 213 (2008) (quoting Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co., 172 Ill. 2d 325, 334 , 665 N.E.2d 1199, 1204 (1996)). 2015Arvia v. Madigan, 209 Ill. 2d 520, 526 , 809 N.E.2d 88, 93 (2004). ¶ 23 " 'The doctrine of res judicata provides that a final judgment on the merits rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction bars any subsequent actions between the same parties or their privies on the same cause of action.' " Hudson v. City of Chicago, 228 Ill. 2d 462, 467 , 889 N.E.2d 210, 213 (2008) (quoting Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co., 172 Ill. 2d 325, 334 , 665 N.E.2d 1199, 1204 (1996)). | 3 | 3 |
Federal Signal Corp. v. SLC Technologies, Inc.green2 sentences2005Federal Signal Corp., 318 Ill. 2005Federal Signal Corp. , 318 Ill. | 2 | 4 |
Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.green2 sentences2015Arvia v. Madigan, 209 Ill. 2d 520, 526 , 809 N.E.2d 88, 93 (2004). ¶ 23 " 'The doctrine of res judicata provides that a final judgment on the merits rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction bars any subsequent actions between the same parties or their privies on the same cause of action.' " Hudson v. City of Chicago, 228 Ill. 2d 462, 467 , 889 N.E.2d 210, 213 (2008) (quoting Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co., 172 Ill. 2d 325, 334 , 665 N.E.2d 1199, 1204 (1996)). 2015Arvia v. Madigan, 209 Ill. 2d 520, 526 , 809 N.E.2d 88, 93 (2004). ¶ 23 " 'The doctrine of res judicata provides that a final judgment on the merits rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction bars any subsequent actions between the same parties or their privies on the same cause of action.' " Hudson v. City of Chicago, 228 Ill. 2d 462, 467 , 889 N.E.2d 210, 213 (2008) (quoting Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co., 172 Ill. 2d 325, 334 , 665 N.E.2d 1199, 1204 (1996)). | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hayashi v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation
green
2 sentences2015Hayashi v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation, 2014 IL 116023, ¶ 45 ; Arvia v. Madigan, 209 Ill. 2d 520, 526 (2004). ¶ 44 Res judicata is an equitable doctrine designed to prevent multiple lawsuits between the same parties where the facts and issues are the same. 2015Hayashi v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation, 2014 IL 116023, ¶ 45 ; Arvia v. Madigan, 209 Ill. 2d 520, 526 (2004). ¶ 44 Res judicata is an equitable doctrine designed to prevent multiple lawsuits between the same parties where the facts and issues are the same. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Lutkauskas v. Ricker
green
1 sentence2024Lutkauskas v. Ricker, 2015 IL 117090, ¶ 43 . ¶ 31 The doctrine of res judicata provides that a final judgment on the merits rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction bars any later actions between the same parties or their privies on the same cause of action. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Law Offices of Nye & Associates v. Boado
green
1 sentence2021Law Offices of Nye & Associates, Ltd. v. Boado, 2012 IL App (2d) 110804, ¶ 12 . ¶ 28 The obligations imposed by the Annexation Agreement and Amendment are governed by basic rules of contract interpretation. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad v. Chicago Union Station Co.
green
1 sentence2009Corp. v. Chicago Union Station Co., 358 Ill. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.