Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassigreen2 sentences2013We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estoppel is a “doctrine of last resort.” Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915, 918 (La.1986). 2013We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estop-pel is a “doctrine of last resort.” How ard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915, 918 (La.1986). | 5 | 11 |
Morris v. Friedmangreen2 sentences2020See Morris v. Friedman, 94-2808, p. 9 (La. 11/27/95), 663 So.2d 19, 25 (observing that Louisiana law disfavors estoppel); Palermo Land Co., Inc. v. Planning Comm’n of Calcasieu Par., 561 So.2d 482, 488 (La. 1990). 2017Id. | 1 | 3 |
Dye v. Ipik Door Co., Inc.green1 sentence2023Dye v. Ipik Door Co., Inc., 570 So.2d 477, 479 (La. | 1 | 1 |
Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com'n of Calcasieu Parishgreen1 sentence2020See Morris v. Friedman, 94-2808, p. 9 (La. 11/27/95), 663 So.2d 19, 25 (observing that Louisiana law disfavors estoppel); Palermo Land Co., Inc. v. Planning Comm’n of Calcasieu Par., 561 So.2d 482, 488 (La. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howard Trucking Co. v. Stassi
green
2 sentences1993As recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915 (La. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 948 , 107 S.Ct. 432 , 93 L.Ed.2d 382 (1986): "`Estoppel' in its various forms seems to be a doctrine of last resort. 1990As the Supreme Court stated in Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915 (La.1986), cert. den., 479 U.S. 948 , 107 S.Ct. 432 , 93 L.Ed.2d 382 (1986): "`Estoppel' in its various forms seems to be a doctrine of last resort. | 6 | 1988–2004 |
Reeves v. United States
green
2 sentences1993As recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915 (La. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 948 , 107 S.Ct. 432 , 93 L.Ed.2d 382 (1986): "`Estoppel' in its various forms seems to be a doctrine of last resort. 1990As the Supreme Court stated in Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915 (La.1986), cert. den., 479 U.S. 948 , 107 S.Ct. 432 , 93 L.Ed.2d 382 (1986): "`Estoppel' in its various forms seems to be a doctrine of last resort. | 5 | 1988–2004 |
Sumner v. Shuman
green
2 sentences1993As recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915 (La. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 948 , 107 S.Ct. 432 , 93 L.Ed.2d 382 (1986): "`Estoppel' in its various forms seems to be a doctrine of last resort. 1990As the Supreme Court stated in Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915 (La.1986), cert. den., 479 U.S. 948 , 107 S.Ct. 432 , 93 L.Ed.2d 382 (1986): "`Estoppel' in its various forms seems to be a doctrine of last resort. | 4 | 1990–2004 |
State v. Mitchell
green
2 sentences2013We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estoppel is a “doctrine of last resort.” Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915, 918 (La.1986). 2012We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estoppel is a “doctrine of last resort.” Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915, 918 (La.1986). | 3 | 2011–2013 |
Robbins Tire & Rubber v. Winnfield Retread
green
2 sentences2010Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. Winnfield Retread Inc., 577 So.2d 1189 (La.App. 2d Cir.1991), and citations therein. 2010Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. Winnfxeld Retread Inc., 577 So.2d 1189 (La.App. 2d Cir.1991), and citations therein. | 2 | 1996–2010 |
John Bailey Contr. v. St., Dept. of Tr. & Dev.
green
2 sentences1997We acknowledge that “estoppels are not favored in our law” and appear to be used as “a doctrine of last resort.” Id. 1991John Bailey Contractor, supra ; KPW Associates, supra ; Lilly, supra . | 2 | 1991–1997 |
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence2013Id. at 1181 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Trinity Universal Insurance
green
1 sentence2011We must narrowly construe this argument, as "estoppel is not favored in our law," Id., and estoppel is a "doctrine of last resort." Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915, 918 (La.1986). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
KPW ASSOCIATES v. SS Kresge Co.
green
1 sentence1991John Bailey Contractor, supra ; KPW Associates, supra ; Lilly, supra . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Lilly v. Angelo
green
1 sentence1991John Bailey Contractor, supra ; KPW Associates, supra ; Lilly, supra . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Pennsylvania-Central Airlines Corp. v. Duskin
green
1 sentence1988Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So.2d 915 (La.1986), cert. den. 107 S.Ct. 432 , 93 L.Ed. 382 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.