Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wainwright v. Wittgreen2 sentences1995The defendant next assigns error to (1) the trial court’s denial of his motion to prohibit death qualification voir dire questions; (2) the State’s use of peremptory challenges to excuse jurors not meeting the standard for excusal for cause under Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 , 83 L. 1995The defendant next assigns error to (1) the trial court’s denial of his motion to prohibit death qualification voir dire questions; (2) the State’s use of peremptory challenges to excuse jurors not meeting the standard for excusal for cause under Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 , 83 L. | 2 | 3 |
State v. McNeilgreen2 sentences1997He concedes we have decided this question against his position in State v. McNeil, 324 N.C. 33, 44 , 375 S.E.2d 909, 916 (1989), sentence vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1050 , 108 L. 1997He concedes we have decided this question against his position in State v. McNeil, 324 N.C. 33, 44 , 375 S.E.2d 909, 916 (1989), sentence vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1050 , 108 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Brittgreen2 sentences1996See State v. Britt, 288 N.C. 699, 712 , 220 S.E.2d 283, 291 (1975). 1996See State v. Britt, 288 N.C. 699, 712 , 220 S.E.2d 283, 291 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kirkleygreen2 sentences1994The defendant next assigns error to the jury’s failure to find two statutory mitigating circumstances, N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000(f)(2) and (f)(6) which are: “[t]he capital felony was committed while the defendant was under the influence of mental or emotional disturbance” and “[t]he capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements 'of law was impaired.” The defendant, relying on State v. Kirkley, 308 N.C. 196, 220 , 302 S.E.2d 144, 158 (1983), says a jury cannot refuse to find and consider a statutory mitigating circumstance which i 1994The defendant next assigns error to the jury’s failure to find two statutory mitigating circumstances, N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000(f)(2) and (f)(6) which are: “[t]he capital felony was committed while the defendant was under the influence of mental or emotional disturbance” and “[t]he capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements 'of law was impaired.” The defendant, relying on State v. Kirkley, 308 N.C. 196, 220 , 302 S.E.2d 144, 158 (1983), says a jury cannot refuse to find and consider a statutory mitigating circumstance which i | 1 | 1 |
State v. McKoygreen2 sentences1994“A person has a right to kill not only in his own self-defense but also in defense of *466 another.” State v. McKoy, 332 N.C. 639, 643 , 422 S.E.2d 713, 716 (1992) (citing State v. Carter, 254 N.C. 475 , 119 S.E.2d 461 (1961)). 1994“A person has a right to kill not only in his own self-defense but also in defense of *466 another.” State v. McKoy, 332 N.C. 639, 643 , 422 S.E.2d 713, 716 (1992) (citing State v. Carter, 254 N.C. 475 , 119 S.E.2d 461 (1961)). | 1 | 1 |
| Eddings v. Oklahomagreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Alstongreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Franksgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Garnergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Witherspoon v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1994The defendant next assigns error to the court’s refusal to let him rehabilitate a juror whom the State challenged for cause pursuant to Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L. 1994The defendant next assigns error to the court’s refusal to let him rehabilitate a juror whom the State challenged for cause pursuant to Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L. | 2 | 1994–1995 |
Blakely v. Washington
green
2 sentences2005The defendant next assigns as error that the trial court sentenced him in the aggravated range without the finding of the existence of aggravating factors by a jury in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 159 L. 2005The defendant next assigns as error that the trial court sentenced him in the aggravated range without the finding of the existence of aggravating factors by a jury in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 159 L. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Mapp v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1997He says first that he was taken into custody without probable cause to arrest him and that his statements to the officers should have been suppressed as the “fruit of a poisonous tree.” Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 6 L. 1997He says first that he was taken into custody without probable cause to arrest him and that his statements to the officers should have been suppressed as the “fruit of a poisonous tree.” Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 6 L. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, Inc.
green
1 sentence1997He concedes we have decided this question against his position in State v. McNeil, 324 N.C. 33, 44 , 375 S.E.2d 909, 916 (1989), sentence vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1050 , 108 L. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Hardy
green
2 sentences1997The defendant, relying on State v. Hardy, 339 N.C. 207 , 451 S.E.2d 600 (1994), says the testimony of certain witnesses as to what the victim told them merely recited facts and did not show the victim’s state of mind. 1997The defendant, relying on State v. Hardy, 339 N.C. 207 , 451 S.E.2d 600 (1994), says the testimony of certain witnesses as to what the victim told them merely recited facts and did not show the victim’s state of mind. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State University
green
1 sentence1996In State v. Jones, 339 N.C. 114 , 451 S.E.2d 826 (1994), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 132 L. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences1996In State v. Jones, 339 N.C. 114 , 451 S.E.2d 826 (1994), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 132 L. 1996In State v. Jones, 339 N.C. 114 , 451 S.E.2d 826 (1994), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 132 L. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Martin
green
2 sentences1995We have approved similar instructions in State v. Martin, 294 N.C. 253 , 240 S.E.2d 415 , and State v. Griffin, 280 N.C. 142 , 185 S.E.2d 149 (1971). 1995We have approved similar instructions in State v. Martin, 294 N.C. 253 , 240 S.E.2d 415 , and State v. Griffin, 280 N.C. 142 , 185 S.E.2d 149 (1971). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Griffin
green
2 sentences1995We have approved similar instructions in State v. Martin, 294 N.C. 253 , 240 S.E.2d 415 , and State v. Griffin, 280 N.C. 142 , 185 S.E.2d 149 (1971). 1995We have approved similar instructions in State v. Martin, 294 N.C. 253 , 240 S.E.2d 415 , and State v. Griffin, 280 N.C. 142 , 185 S.E.2d 149 (1971). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Ake v. Oklahoma
green
2 sentences1994The State paid for the psychological examination pursuant to Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 , 105 S.Ct. 1087 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985). 1994The State paid for the psychological examination pursuant to Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 , 105 S.Ct. 1087 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences1994“A person has a right to kill not only in his own self-defense but also in defense of *466 another.” State v. McKoy, 332 N.C. 639, 643 , 422 S.E.2d 713, 716 (1992) (citing State v. Carter, 254 N.C. 475 , 119 S.E.2d 461 (1961)). 1994“A person has a right to kill not only in his own self-defense but also in defense of *466 another.” State v. McKoy, 332 N.C. 639, 643 , 422 S.E.2d 713, 716 (1992) (citing State v. Carter, 254 N.C. 475 , 119 S.E.2d 461 (1961)). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences1994State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656, 686 , 292 S.E.2d 243, 261 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982). 1994State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656, 686 , 292 S.E.2d 243, 261 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Lloyd
green
2 sentences1994The defendant did not request that this circumstance be submitted to the jury but we held in State v. Lloyd, 321 N.C. 301 , 364 S.E.2d 316 (1988), death penalty vacated, 488 U.S. 807 , 109 S.Ct. 38 , 102 L.Ed.2d 18 (1988), that it must be submitted if his record as a whole would reasonably support a finding by the jury that the defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity. 1994The defendant did not request that this circumstance be submitted to the jury but we held in State v. Lloyd, 321 N.C. 301 , 364 S.E.2d 316 (1988), death penalty vacated, 488 U.S. 807 , 109 S.Ct. 38 , 102 L.Ed.2d 18 (1988), that it must be submitted if his record as a whole would reasonably support a finding by the jury that the defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Buschbom v. Gomez, Director, California Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence1994State v. Syriani, 333 N.C. 350 , 428 S.E.2d 118 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 392 , 126 L.Ed.2d 341 (1993); State v. Roper, 328 N.C. 337 , 402 S.E.2d 600 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 280 , 116 L.Ed.2d 232 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Lockett v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1994The defendant says that he was entitled to have the jury consider anything that it might deem to justify a sentence less than death, Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 , 98 S.Ct. 2954 , 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978), and that evidence that he would receive appropriate sentences for his other crimes might mitigate against a sentence of death in this case. 1994The defendant says that he was entitled to have the jury consider anything that it might deem to justify a sentence less than death, Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 , 98 S.Ct. 2954 , 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978), and that evidence that he would receive appropriate sentences for his other crimes might mitigate against a sentence of death in this case. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Roper
green
2 sentences1994State v. Syriani, 333 N.C. 350 , 428 S.E.2d 118 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 392 , 126 L.Ed.2d 341 (1993); State v. Roper, 328 N.C. 337 , 402 S.E.2d 600 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 280 , 116 L.Ed.2d 232 (1991). 1994State v. Syriani, 333 N.C. 350 , 428 S.E.2d 118 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 392 , 126 L.Ed.2d 341 (1993); State v. Roper, 328 N.C. 337 , 402 S.E.2d 600 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 280 , 116 L.Ed.2d 232 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Syriani green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Smith v. North Carolina; Williams v. North Carolina; And Pinch v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1994State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656, 686 , 292 S.E.2d 243, 261 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 74 L. 1994State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656, 686 , 292 S.E.2d 243, 261 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Zettlemoyer v. Fulcomer
green
1 sentence1994State v. Syriani, 333 N.C. 350 , 428 S.E.2d 118 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 392 , 126 L.Ed.2d 341 (1993); State v. Roper, 328 N.C. 337 , 402 S.E.2d 600 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 280 , 116 L.Ed.2d 232 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Richardson Engineering Co. v. William L. Crow Construction Co.
green
1 sentence1994State v. Syriani, 333 N.C. 350 , 428 S.E.2d 118 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 392 , 126 L.Ed.2d 341 (1993); State v. Roper, 328 N.C. 337 , 402 S.E.2d 600 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 280 , 116 L.Ed.2d 232 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Shirk v. McLaughlin
green
2 sentences1994The defendant did not request that this circumstance be submitted to the jury but we held in State v. Lloyd, 321 N.C. 301 , 364 S.E.2d 316 (1988), death penalty vacated, 488 U.S. 807 , 102 L. 1994The defendant did not request that this circumstance be submitted to the jury but we held in State v. Lloyd, 321 N.C. 301 , 364 S.E.2d 316 (1988), death penalty vacated, 488 U.S. 807 , 109 S.Ct. 38 , 102 L.Ed.2d 18 (1988), that it must be submitted if his record as a whole would reasonably support a finding by the jury that the defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Washington State Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Forrest
green
1 sentence1994The defendant did not request that this circumstance be submitted to the jury but we held in State v. Lloyd, 321 N.C. 301 , 364 S.E.2d 316 (1988), death penalty vacated, 488 U.S. 807 , 109 S.Ct. 38 , 102 L.Ed.2d 18 (1988), that it must be submitted if his record as a whole would reasonably support a finding by the jury that the defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Bank of San Marino Building, Ltd. v. Default Service Co.
green
2 sentences1994The defendant did not request that this circumstance be submitted to the jury but we held in State v. Lloyd, 321 N.C. 301 , 364 S.E.2d 316 (1988), death penalty vacated, 488 U.S. 807 , 102 L. 1994The defendant did not request that this circumstance be submitted to the jury but we held in State v. Lloyd, 321 N.C. 301 , 364 S.E.2d 316 (1988), death penalty vacated, 488 U.S. 807 , 109 S.Ct. 38 , 102 L.Ed.2d 18 (1988), that it must be submitted if his record as a whole would reasonably support a finding by the jury that the defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Moseley
green
2 sentences1994This assignment of error is overruled pursuant to State v. Moseley, 336 N.C. 710 , 445 S.E.2d 906 (1994). *483 The defendant next assigns error to certain testimony by his teacher who testified for the State. 1994This assignment of error is overruled pursuant to State v. Moseley, 336 N.C. 710 , 445 S.E.2d 906 (1994). *483 The defendant next assigns error to certain testimony by his teacher who testified for the State. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Price
green
2 sentences1994In State v. Price, 331 N.C. 620 , 418 S.E.2d 169 (1992), vacated and remanded, - U.S. -, 122 L. 1994In State v. Price, 331 N.C. 620 , 418 S.E.2d 169 (1992), vacated and remanded, - U.S. -, 122 L. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Conner
green
2 sentences1994During its deliberations, the jury sent a note to the court asking whether the defendant could ever be eligible for parole from the sentences imposed for the crimes against Leigh Cooper. *558 The Court, pursuant to State v. Conner, 241 N.C. 468 , 85 S.E.2d 584 (1955), instructed the jury that they should not consider eligibility for parole in reaching a verdict but should determine the question as though life means imprisonment for life. 1994During its deliberations, the jury sent a note to the court asking whether the defendant could ever be eligible for parole from the sentences imposed for the crimes against Leigh Cooper. *558 The Court, pursuant to State v. Conner, 241 N.C. 468 , 85 S.E.2d 584 (1955), instructed the jury that they should not consider eligibility for parole in reaching a verdict but should determine the question as though life means imprisonment for life. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Robbins green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Cage v. Louisiana green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Blockburger v. United States green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| State v. Freeland green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Anderson green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.